Alan,
Thanks! That works!
Mike
-Original Message-
From: Alan Hodgson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 20, 2003 2:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Postfix question
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Mike Koponick wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had
Mike Koponick wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had run into the same issue, and I apologize
> in advance if this is the incorrect place to bring up the subject.
>
> I would like to setup Postfix to allow ANYONE to e-mail to my postfix
> server and use it as a relay. This is done for visiting peo
On Mon, Oct 20, 2003 at 03:01:06PM -0700, Mike Koponick wrote:
> I was wondering if anyone had run into the same issue, and I apologize
> in advance if this is the incorrect place to bring up the subject.
>
> I would like to setup Postfix to allow ANYONE to e-mail to my postfix
> server and use it
Brett Franck wrote:
Postfix 2.0 is the MTA. How can I allow a host of "63.111.163.37: 450
Client host rejected: cannot find your hostname" to be allowed to
transfer mail IN to my server but still use the reject_unknown_hostname
recipient restriction?
Looks like you should create an alternate sm
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, R.E. wrote:
> i managed to relay the smtp server...but i still get this message
> -
>
> This is the Postfix program at host linuxbox.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
>
> below could not be delivered to on
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, R.E. wrote:
> i managed to relay the smtp server...but i still get this message
> -
>
> This is the Postfix program at host linuxbox.com.
>
> I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
>
> below could not be delivered to on
i managed to relay the smtp server...but i still get this message
-
This is the Postfix program at host linuxbox.com.
I'm sorry to have to inform you that the message returned
below could not be delivered to one or more destinations.
For further assistance, pleas
> how do i configure postfix to use another smtp server for out going mail?
Look in your /etc/postfix/main.cf file, you should see a relayhost line.
Mine looks like:
relayhost = smtp.central.cox.net
Ben
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/ma
I'd be very interested to know about the chroot stuff when you get it
figured out.
Thanks,
On Mon, 2003-09-08 at 18:19, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Cowles, Steve wrote:
>
> > I followed the excellent instructions at
> > http://postfix.wl0.org/en/building-rpms to enable SASL/TLS. Skip to the
> > sect
Cowles, Steve wrote:
I followed the excellent instructions at
http://postfix.wl0.org/en/building-rpms to enable SASL/TLS. Skip to the
section labled "Building from Source"
NOTE: These instructions are based on using the postfix source RPM which can
also found at the same website.
I was trying to u
Graham Leggett wrote:
> Keith Morse wrote:
>
>> Graham, if you don't get a decent response here I'd suggest that you
>> check the postfix users list archives. I know this has been
>> discussed before on that list.
>>
>>
>> http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
>
> After a whole lot of digging, t
Keith Morse wrote:
Graham, if you don't get a decent response here I'd suggest that you
check the postfix users list archives. I know this has been discussed
before on that list.
http://www.postfix.org/lists.html
After a whole lot of digging, the problem seems to be this:
Redhat's version of
On Mon, 8 Sep 2003, Graham Leggett wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I am trying to use Postfix with SASL support as provided by Redhat v9:
>
> postfix-1.1.12-1
> cyrus-sasl-2.1.10-4
>
> According to the package dependancies, postfix has been compiled to
> support SASL, but having configured it I get acces
great and thanks I'm on it
Tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jason Dixon
Sent: Sunday, September 07, 2003 8:41 PM
To: Red Hat Mailing List
Subject: Re: Postfix and ntsysv question
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 21:31, Tim Lamberth wrote:
&g
On Sun, 2003-09-07 at 21:31, Tim Lamberth wrote:
> Did a new install of Redhat 9 and Postfix after the loss of my scsi drive
> and controller. When I run ntsysv to set Postfix to run at startup it is not
> listed. Any ideas as to why it would be missing in the list?
If there is an init script for
> > One question I have that came out of this discussion is
> why are systems
> > behind routers safer? What kind of security does a
router provide?
>
> A router by itself does not provide any inherent
security. However:
>
> A standard router, such as a cisco 2501, can do port
> blocking, wh
On Thu, Sep 04, 2003 at 11:05:52AM -1000, Marc Adler wrote:
> One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
> behind routers safer?
They aren't. They are just simpler to admin. So if you don't know what
you are doing, or don't have the time to tend to business, they can
> One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
> behind routers safer? What kind of security does a router provide?
A router by itself does not provide any inherent security. However:
A standard router, such as a cisco 2501, can do port blocking, which can add
some sec
One question I have that came out of this discussion is why are systems
behind routers safer? What kind of security does a router provide?
By the way, the first line in /etc/resolv.conf has not been added back
in, and my system is back to normal. Thanks!
--
Marc Adler
--
redhat-list mailing l
> On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 10:26, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > > However, the local caching nameserver could be an appropriate solution
> > > iff the ISP is continuously negligent of DNS service problems and Marc
> > > invests the time to learn how to properly secure such a service.
> >
> > As a perso
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 10:26, Benjamin J. Weiss wrote:
> > However, the local caching nameserver could be an appropriate solution
> > iff the ISP is continuously negligent of DNS service problems and Marc
> > invests the time to learn how to properly secure such a service.
>
> As a person who is st
> However, the local caching nameserver could be an appropriate solution
> iff the ISP is continuously negligent of DNS service problems and Marc
> invests the time to learn how to properly secure such a service.
As a person who is standing up a linux DNS (yes, it's necessary), I just
want to doub
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:26, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:11, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
> >
> > Your response speaks for itself. In this age of worms and script
> > kiddies, we can't afford to propogate the notion that the Internet is
> > some big sandbox for everyone to play in. If y
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:11, Jason Dixon wrote:
>
> Your response speaks for itself. In this age of worms and script
> kiddies, we can't afford to propogate the notion that the Internet is
> some big sandbox for everyone to play in. If you're going to provide a
> public service, you need to be
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:03, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:51, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > No, really, it _was_ crappy advice. Do you also instruct others to
> > install their own POP/SMTP/IMAP server when Hotmail goes down?
> >
> Depends on the person, but sure I would. People like to m
On Wed, 2003-09-03 at 00:03, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:51, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > No, really, it _was_ crappy advice. Do you also instruct others to
> > install their own POP/SMTP/IMAP server when Hotmail goes down?
> >
> Depends on the person, but sure I would. People like to m
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:51, Jason Dixon wrote:
> No, really, it _was_ crappy advice. Do you also instruct others to
> install their own POP/SMTP/IMAP server when Hotmail goes down?
>
Depends on the person, but sure I would. People like to make things
work, learn, etc. Most of the people who take
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:16, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > Ed, you're absolutely right. I apologize for the tone of my previous
> > post. I get all worked up when folks give crappy advice. ;-)
> >
> It wasn't crappy advice, it's just different from your
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:16, Jason Dixon wrote:
> if you want, but it's
> obvious he doesn't have a clue.
Quick to strike aren't ya?
> Ed, you're absolutely right. I apologize for the tone of my previous
> post. I get all worked up when folks give crappy advice. ;-)
>
It wasn't crappy advice,
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 23:00, Marc Adler wrote:
> Ok, ok. So what should I do?
>
> Remove the offending line from /etc/resolves.conf (the first one, if I
> remember correctly) and the other local nameservers stuff, then:
Yup. Look back to my 2nd reply for further details. I made some
comments a
* Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 16:18]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:08, Ed Wilts wrote:
> > On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:55:41PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> > >
> > > Wrong. DNS us
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 22:08, Ed Wilts wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:55:41PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> >
> > Wrong. DNS uses 53/tcp for zone transfers, 53/udp for normal queries.
> > Just
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 09:55:41PM -0400, Jason Dixon wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> >
> > > I will, but I don't understand why running your own name server is bad.
> > It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 21:44, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
>
> > I will, but I don't understand why running your own name server is bad.
> > Could you explain that?
> >
> It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort. Mostly a matter
> of opinion. The on
On Tue, Sep 02, 2003 at 08:44:24PM -0500, NfoCipher wrote:
> >
> It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort. Mostly a matter
Or it is configured for local use only:
options {
directory "/var/named";
listen-on { 192.168.10.1; };
[...]
--
Hal Burgiss
--
redhat-list mai
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 20:18, Marc Adler wrote:
> I will, but I don't understand why running your own name server is bad.
> Could you explain that?
>
It's not bad if you're behind a firewall of some sort. Mostly a matter
of opinion. The only time you need to secure a dns server is if your
port 53
* Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 14:40]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:55, Marc Adler wrote:
> > * Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 13:42]:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> > > > * NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:59]:
> > > > > On Tue, 2003-09
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:55, Marc Adler wrote:
> * Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 13:42]:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> > > * NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:59]:
> > > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> > > > > I took a look at /etc/
* Jason Dixon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 13:42]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> > * NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:59]:
> > > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> > > > I took a look at /etc/resolv.conf and there were a few entries in it,
> > > > b
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 19:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> * NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:59]:
> > On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> > > I took a look at /etc/resolv.conf and there were a few entries in it,
> > > but how do I know if they are valid?
> > >
> > Well, your isp is
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 18:59, NfoCipher wrote:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> > I took a look at /etc/resolv.conf and there were a few entries in it,
> > but how do I know if they are valid?
> >
> Well, your isp is sending those to you via dhcp, so you can assume
> they're valid
* NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 12:59]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> > I took a look at /etc/resolv.conf and there were a few entries in it,
> > but how do I know if they are valid?
> >
> Well, your isp is sending those to you via dhcp, so you can assume
> they're
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 17:42, Marc Adler wrote:
> I took a look at /etc/resolv.conf and there were a few entries in it,
> but how do I know if they are valid?
>
Well, your isp is sending those to you via dhcp, so you can assume
they're valid but they may not respond very fast - causing a delay.
You
* NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-09-02 10:53]:
> On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> > DNS settings? I'm too newbie to figure it out on my
> > own.
> Sounds like your problem. Make sure there are valid entries in
> /etc/resolv.conf and/or make sure your named is running if you
On Tue, 2003-09-02 at 15:35, Marc Adler wrote:
> DNS settings? I'm too newbie to figure it out on my
> own.
Sounds like your problem. Make sure there are valid entries in
/etc/resolv.conf and/or make sure your named is running if you use that.
--
NfoCipher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
ChickenWare, LLC
On Sun, 2003-08-10 at 15:52, Lorenzo Prince wrote:
> Hi. I am running Postfix on RH9. I am trying to use
> /etc/postfix/access to reject email addresses adn domains that send me
> spam. I followed the documentation on how to do this, and I run
> postmap /etc/postfix/access
> to rebuild the da
On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 03:21:04PM -0700, Jason Williams wrote:
>
> Now, if im correct, isn't something like 2.0 our?
> Is the version installed with 9.0 really that far behind?
Postfix 2.0 came out a day before the last RHL 9 beta shipped
so it was too late to include in the final version.
If y
Lorenzo Prince wrote:
It actually took me forever to find an RPM for postfix 2.0.x.
The BEST place to get up to date rpms is from Simon Mudd's website. The
URL is:
http://postfix.wl0.org/en/
-ste
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.redhat.com/mailman
It actually took me forever to find an RPM for postfix 2.0.x. The best I could come
up with was 2.0.12. If anyone
would like a copy, you can get it from
ftp://princenet.sytes.net/software/postfix-2.0.12-1.rh9.i386.rpm
HTH
Lorenzo Prince
Happy Red Hat 9 user ;)
--
I've run DOOM more in the la
BTW, anyone running the latest version from Red Hat? Or is it best to get
the latest release from www.postfix.org and install from there?
Trying to weigh whether or now I should upgrade.
Jason
At 06:27 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Jason Williams wrote:
Just a quick question here.
I recently
Yes they are...time for a uninstall and compile from source.
Jason
At 06:27 PM 7/18/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Jason Williams wrote:
Just a quick question here.
I recently installed RH 9.0 with Postfix. When I typed postconf
mail_version, mine came back with 1.1.11
Now, if im correct, isn't somethi
Jason Williams wrote:
Just a quick question here.
I recently installed RH 9.0 with Postfix. When I typed postconf
mail_version, mine came back with 1.1.11
Now, if im correct, isn't something like 2.0 our?
Is the version installed with 9.0 really that far behind?
Or, have I just had a very lon
PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leo Huang
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Postfix Mail Woes
netstat -an|grep ':25'
see whether it's listening on 127.0.0.1:25
Leo
Scott Antonivich wrote:
I am not able to receive mail on my new server:
Connection r
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 10:48:18AM -0400, Scott Antonivich wrote:
>
> I am not able to receive mail on my new server:
> Connection refused (port 25)
Could you please give the 5 lines before and after this message
as well as the out put of "postconf -n" ?
Emmanuel
--
redhat-list mailing list
un
Yes. I've recompiled postfix from source on my server.
As far as relay, I meant putting up a server on our DMZ and configuring
postifx on it to relay email from that server, to the internal mail server.
Spamassassin a bad thing? I was told that it was really good and cutting
down spam. Hmm.
At
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 19:10, Jason Williams wrote:
> Hello everyone. I wanted to ask a couple of questions I have about setting
> up a mail relay as well as setting up a postfix mail server.
>
> Here is what I want to do.
> I am setting up a mail server for our network. It is going to run Postifx
Edit /etc/postfix/main.cf and change the inet_interfaces line so that it reads as
follows:
inet_interfaces = $myhistname, localhost
Also edit /etc/postfix/aliases so that the root alias actually points to a user
account where you can receive mail.
HTH.
Lorenzo Prince
happy Red Hat 9 user :)
-
Assuming you have postfix already installed, you can simply use redhat-switch-mail to
change the default mail server to
postfix.
Lorenzo Prince
happy Red Hat 9 user :)
--
"World domination. Fast"
(By Linus Torvalds)
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://ww
: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:04 PM
To: Scott Antonivich
Subject: Re: Postfix RedHat9 - Getting odd
Hmmm, did you restart postfix after editing the config files?
Does the maillog (/var/log/maillog) show anything?
-Scott
On Wed, 16 Jul 2003 15:18:22 -0400
"Scott Antonivich" <[EM
Aughhh...
ok its not there...but 127.0.0.1:25 is
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 3:17 PM
To: Scott Antonivich
Subject: Re: Postfix RedHat9 - Getting odd
What does netstat -ant show?
It should show
0.0.0.0
It was not set to all.
I have set it to
inet_interfaces = all
and restarted postfix.same problem.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:25 PM
To: Scott Antonivich
Subject: Re: Postfix RedHat9 - Getting odd
OK
flags=Fq. user=foo argv=/usr/local/sbin/bsmtp -f $sender $nexthop
$recipient
Scott
-Original Message-
From: Scott Sharkey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 2:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Postfix RedHat9 - Getting odd
Did my
On Wed, Jul 16, 2003 at 12:01:49PM -0400, Scott Antonivich wrote:
>
> 3)nmap shows
> Port State Service
> 25/tcp opensmtp
> 110/tcpopenpop-3
>
> Error that the sending email server is 'Connection refused (port 25)'
Because you are only listening on localhost (
netstat -an|grep :25
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:250.0.0.0:* LISTEN
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Leo Huang
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 12:17 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Postfix Mail Woes
On Wed, 2003-07-16 at 08:09, Scott Antonivich wrote:
> Hmmm pop3s - shouldnt that be ipop3?
No. pop3s is POP3 over SSL, on port 995. ipop3 is an implementation
of POP3, not a service name.
- rick warner
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://www.r
netstat -an|grep ':25'
see whether it's listening on 127.0.0.1:25
Leo
Scott Antonivich wrote:
I am not able to receive mail on my new server:
Connection refused (port 25)
I have my iptables configured with
-A RH-Lokkit-0-50-INPUT -p tcp -m tcp --dport 25 --syn -j ACCEPT
What else could I be
Behalf Of David Demner
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:50 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix RedHat9
>
> My guess is that your port is either not open on 25 or that it's
> restricted by iptables or hosts.deny.
>
I don't know anything about postfix, but I don&#
>
> My guess is that your port is either not open on 25 or that it's
> restricted by iptables or hosts.deny.
>
I don't know anything about postfix, but I don't think this is correct. If port 25
was blocked, the logs wouldn't get into the maillog (which is generated by postfix).
It sounds t
Antonivich
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:07 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix Mail Woes
Here is the complete list:
Port State Service
21/tcp openftp
22/tcp openssh
25/tcp opensmtp
53/tcp opendomain
79/tcp open
openhttps
953/tcpopenrndc
995/tcpopenpop3s
3306/tcp openmysql
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Antonivich
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix
Okay, and how are you trying to get the mail sent to you? Can you SSH
or telnet to port 25 from another box?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Antonivich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:04 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix Mail Woes
Interesting
16, 2003 12:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix Mail Woes
Geez, I don't know, can you nmap to see if port 25 is even open?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Antonivich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Postfix
Interesting ports on (127.0.0.1):
Port State Service
25/tcp opensmtp
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Haney
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 11:03 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix Mail Woes
Geez
Geez, I don't know, can you nmap to see if port 25 is even open?
-Original Message-
From: Scott Antonivich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:48 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Postfix Mail Woes
I am not able to receive mail on my new server:
Connection refus
My guess is that your port is either not open on 25 or that it's
restricted by iptables or hosts.deny.
-Original Message-
From: Scott Antonivich [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix RedHat9
Thanks!
Actual
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Mark Haney
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix RedHat9
I'd have to say www.postfix.org is a good place to start. When I first
setup my postfix server a couple years ago, I learned how to co
18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Postfix RedHat9
Let me add by saying I have Postfix up and runningit sends but
doesnt seem to recieve.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Antonivich
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:15
Let me add by saying I have Postfix up and runningit sends but doesnt
seem to recieve.
Scott
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Scott Antonivich
Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 10:15 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Postfix RedHat9
Can any
- Original Message -
From: "John Nichel" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 8:50 PM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
> Daryl Hunt wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "Ben
Daryl Hunt wrote:
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
Daryl,
Millions of us are using linux mail without any proble
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 10:10 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
> Daryl,
>
> Millions of us are using linux mail without any problem
- Original Message -
From: "Ed Wilts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 7:18 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
> > Monday, I am
- Original Message -
From: "Hal Burgiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 5:03 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
> On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
> >
> &g
it does require more effort in learning HOW to
achieve your goals.
Ben
- Original Message -
From: "Daryl Hunt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, July 12, 2003 3:38 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
> Monday, I am
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
> Monday, I am switching the MX records to the Windows 2000 server. I will
> continue to try and get postfix or something to work but until then, I go
> with the tried and true. I don't necessarily need a mailserver on the Nix
> unit, ju
On Sat, Jul 12, 2003 at 02:38:02AM -0600, Daryl Hunt wrote:
>
> Linux is still not quite ready for the "Prime Time" IMO.
Because YOU can't figure out Postfix??? Wow. I'd say you are not ready
for a real operating system.
--
Hal Burgiss
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL
Monday, I am switching the MX records to the Windows 2000 server. I will
continue to try and get postfix or something to work but until then, I go
with the tried and true. I don't necessarily need a mailserver on the Nix
unit, just the httpd server. The Windows can handle the rest of the load.
On Jue 10 Jul 2003 21:37, Daryl Hunt wrote:
> > Logs?
>
> I thought mine was not doing it only from an outside source. I am at
> the terminal now going through a Windows Server to send this message.
> Postfix is dead as a doornail (or blocking port 25) even on the RH
> Server.
>
> In otherwords,
Okay, as has been requested, I've posted a short description of how I
got my postfix up and running. Please remember that these were personal
notes that I kept for myself, and weren't intended as any kind of a
HOWTO. I started from a clean RH 9 install. These notes don't include
the contortions
- Original Message -
From: "Martin Marques" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, July 10, 2003 3:37 PM
Subject: Postfix (Was: qmail or sendmail(postfix))
> On Jue 10 Jul 2003 18:14, Daryl Hunt wrote:
> > > FWIW I think that Postfix will be your best solution.
> >
>
hings work
Thanks,
Daryl
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 10:58 AM
Subject: Re: postfix saga grinds on
> I've got some notes on how I installed my RH 9 box, with postfix a
I've got some notes on how I installed my RH 9 box, with postfix and TLS
support. I need to review them, but I'd be happy to email them to you
offline. I'm in the middle of a major project here at work, though, so
it might not be until the weekend, if you can wait that long.
It was tricky, but n
njamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 7:16 AM
> Subject: Re: Postfix
>
>
> > try
> >
> > locate postfix
>
> The only thing it netted was the webmin files.
>
>
> >
>
- Original Message -
From: "Benjamin J. Weiss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, July 07, 2003 7:16 AM
Subject: Re: Postfix
> try
>
> locate postfix
The only thing it netted was the webmin files.
>
> You'll get pl
try
locate postfix
You'll get plenty of results. :) Don't forget, however, that postfix is
actually several programs. Wietse Venema, the gentleman who wrote it,
used the proper *nix philosophy of making several small programs that
each did a small job, but did it well and quickly.
If you are s
On Mon, 2003-07-07 at 06:51, Daryl Hunt wrote:
> I attempt to find postfix and it isn't where it should be. I am running
> RH9.0
>
I have had great success with Postfix after Sendmail drove me to Valium. I
subsequently compiled with SASL support and the spam filtering is spectacular.
My sugges
Ben,
Thanks - that fixed that problem - now it passes the check function ok - but I
can't find postix running with ps -aux - nor will the correct program run when
I connect to port 25 thru telnet. When I telnet to port 25, it opens a telnet
session but never does anything other than saying conn
At 02:59 PM 7/7/03, you wrote:
ok I'm having a real hard time getting postfix to answer requested
connects on
port 25. I have the main.cf config file modified properly (I think). Any
way
wh en I do a postfix check I get the following reply:
postfix/postfix-script: warning: /var/spool/postfix/
Steve,
When you installed postfix it copies your /etc/localtime to
/var/spool/postfix/etc/localtime to fix this copy /etc/localtime to
/var/spool/postfix/etc/localtime and restart postfix you should be fine.
Anytime you change your timezone or resolv.conf files you will need to
update postfix. H
sr/lib/sasl/smtpd.conf
> pwcheck_method: saslauthd
>
> If anyone have a solution , reply =)
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Mike Burger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:50 PM
> Subject
1 - 100 of 201 matches
Mail list logo
