Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Lorenzo Prince
Buck staggered into view and mumbled: > Hopefully Fedora will pick it up from there. To me, it would make sense > that Fedora picks up the up2date program if for no other reason than to > attract financial support from those of us willing and able to pay the > $50 - 60 per year. Up2date will be

Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Michael Schwendt
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:02:23 -0700, Mike McMullen wrote: > Does anyone have an idea when the demo accounts are no longer functional? Where did you read that it would happen? - -- Michael, who doesn't reply to top posts and complete quotes anymore.

RE: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Buck
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora) > Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every > two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access > to binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL. > > Up2Date Demo

Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Benjamin J. Weiss
> Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every > two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access to > binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL. > > Up2Date Demo was free for 2 months for each installation with a unique > email address. At th

Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Mike McMullen
> On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:37:42 -0400 > "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every > > two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access to > > binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL. > > > > Up2Date Dem

Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Sean Estabrooks
On Wed, 24 Sep 2003 13:37:42 -0400 "Buck" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Up until Monday Up2Date was free for filling out a questionaire every > two months. The $60 provided you with convenience and earlier access to > binary downloads and free binary downloads of RHEL. > > Up2Date Demo wa

RE: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Buck
48 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora) Marc Adler wrote: >Let me get this straight: I paid RH for update support >for a year on two machines when I could've gotten the exact same thing >for free? > > Yes, that's correct. Thanks for helping

Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-24 Thread Alan Peery
Marc Adler wrote: Let me get this straight: I paid RH for update support for a year on two machines when I could've gotten the exact same thing for free? Yes, that's correct. Thanks for helping support Redhat, a company who has done a lot of good work for us all. I did my part by buying a bo

Re: yum/apt-get (was Re: Fedora)

2003-09-23 Thread Hal Burgiss
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 02:37:02PM -1000, Marc Adler wrote: > I've followed this thread with interest, especially the references to > yum and apt-get. Let me get this straight: I paid RH for update support > for a year on two machines when I could've gotten the exact same thing > for free? Yes. No