We are running Apache, and 2.0.33 kernel. I will even consider
opinions on
other platforms.
It's not really a RedHat (or Linux for that matter) problem per se.
It's unlikely you'll get better performance out of an other HTTP server
than Apache. You should come over to the Apache list and raise
At 10:26 AM 3/13/98 +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We are running Apache, and 2.0.33 kernel. I will even consider
opinions on
other platforms.
It's not really a RedHat (or Linux for that matter) problem per se.
It's unlikely you'll get better performance out of an other HTTP server
than
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
It depends what you are doing. For flat files, Zeus is widely acknowledged
as the fastest web server around: http://www.zeus.co.uk/
Does anyone actually HAVE servers that are doing just flat-files?
At 09:35 AM 3/13/98 -0600, Derek Balling wrote:
On Fri, 13 Mar 1998, Jonathan Peterson wrote:
It depends what you are doing. For flat files, Zeus is widely acknowledged
as the fastest web server around: http://www.zeus.co.uk/
Does anyone actually HAVE servers that are doing just flat-files?
We are currently running 5 servers that are RH4.2/2.0.33 and 1 server that is
FreeBSD 2.2.5-STABLE, and what I am interested in is if anyone has built a
kernel that can handle alot of file descriptors (is this dynamic in 2.0.33,
like it is in FreeBSD 2.2.5?) and process the listen() backlog
At 04:54 PM 3/12/98 -0500, you wrote:
We are running Apache, and 2.0.33 kernel. I will even consider opinions on
other platforms.
Check out
http://www.qosina.com/~awm/apache/linux-tcp.html
and see if that helps.
Mike
--
Mike Johnson - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Software Engineer/Network
On Thu, Mar 12, 1998 at 04:54:48PM -0500, Chad Wagner wrote:
1. kernel that can exceed 256 file descriptors (is it dynamic, or do you tweak
the kernel?)
You can dynamically increase the total number of open file
descriptors allowed by doing
echo 4096 /proc/sys/kernel/file-max
