Re: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-26 Thread rpjday
New boot (really, no previous run level) and is now in 3. if you change run levels using "init", say "init 2", then runlevel will tell you: # runlevel 3 2 so far, so good. if, however, you take it down to runlevel 1 with "init 1", you get: # runlevel 1

Re: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Statux
el S would logically be best (if not only) accessible by rebooting. On Sat, 25 May 2002, Bret Hughes wrote: > On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 15:15, rpjday wrote: > > > > a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think > > there was not much difference between run level 1

Re: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Bret Hughes
On Sat, 2002-05-25 at 15:15, rpjday wrote: > > a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think > there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels > s or S. after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to > me to make sure *i* un

RE: difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread Wagner, Joseph
It's my understanding that Linux 1 = Linux S -Original Message- From: rpjday [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Saturday, May 25, 2002 3:16 PM To: redhat mailing list Subject: difference between run levels 1 and S a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think

difference between run levels 1 and S

2002-05-25 Thread rpjday
a number of people i've chatted with lately seemed to think there was not much difference between run level 1 and run levels s or S. after i explained it a couple of times, it occurred to me to make sure *i* understood it properly. as i understand it, run level 1 is similar to the

Re: run-levels

2002-01-14 Thread Lorris J. Woods
Nick edit /etc/inittab and change "id:5:initdefault" to "id:3:initdefault", that should do it. --On Sunday, January 13, 2002 11:42 PM +0100 Nick Wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > Can someone please tell me which file I have to edit to h

Re: run-levels

2002-01-13 Thread Nick Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 * On 13-01-02 at 23:49 * Blake Thornton said > > Hi > > Can someone please tell me which file I have to edit to have the boot > > process wind up at run level 3. > > I did this once before but have been re-installing and now can't work > > out

Re: run-levels

2002-01-13 Thread Blake Thornton
> Hi > Can someone please tell me which file I have to edit to have the boot > process wind up at run level 3. > I did this once before but have been re-installing and now can't work > out how to stop X from starting. /etc/inittab ___ Redhat-list ma

Re: run-levels

2002-01-13 Thread Mike Burger
/etc/inittab On Sun, 13 Jan 2002, Nick Wilson wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi > Can someone please tell me which file I have to edit to have the boot > process wind up at run level 3. > I did this once before but have been re-installing and now can't work > out h

run-levels

2002-01-13 Thread Nick Wilson
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Hi Can someone please tell me which file I have to edit to have the boot process wind up at run level 3. I did this once before but have been re-installing and now can't work out how to stop X from starting. Much thanks - -- Nick Wilson Tel:+

Re: Run Levels

2001-11-20 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 11/20/2001 04:26 PM -0800, you wrote: >I'm wondering how closely run levels may affect stablility? I have Red Hat >7.1 running at level 5, but I'm finding x-windows pretty unstable (not as >unstable as Windows though). No effect whatsoever. A "higher" runleve

Run Levels

2001-11-20 Thread cameron
I'm wondering how closely run levels may affect stablility? I have Red Hat 7.1 running at level 5, but I'm finding x-windows pretty unstable (not as unstable as Windows though). Cameron ___ Redhat-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: Using Run Levels

1998-06-02 Thread Matt Housh
That's technically up to you, although there is a method to the madness. Here: runlevel: purpose: 0 halt 1 single-user (no net, no multi) 2 multi-user (no net) 3 multi-user + net 4 curren

Re: Using Run Levels

1998-06-02 Thread Jake Colman
Matt, Thanx for answering but this is not quite what I was looking for. I know the mechanics of how to assign scripts to particular runlevel. What I'm looking for is a definition of what belongs to a particular runlevel. At installation time you can indicate which scripts you'd like to run. I

Re: Using Run Levels

1998-06-01 Thread Matt Housh
The default runlevel is 3, iirc, and therefore scripts are run from /etc/rc.d/rc3.d. Scripts are run from the dir /etc/rc.d/rc.d, as per default. If you want a script to run in a certain runlevel, you could either create it in that runlevel's specific directory, or create it in /etc/rc.d/

Using Run Levels

1998-05-29 Thread Jake Colman
How do I determine which scripts should be assigned to which runlevels? If I want to start running something like amd or autofs, how do I find out the 'preferred' runlevels that the start/stop scripts should be assigned to? -- Jake Colman Principia Partners LLC