On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 19:55, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Skip Morrow wrote:
> > I will post the output from free later. I rebooted recently, so the
> > usage is not quite up there yet. However, I think that your free output
> > is rather alarming too. You should not have 500 megs used, unless you
>
Skip Morrow wrote:
I will post the output from free later. I rebooted recently, so the
usage is not quite up there yet. However, I think that your free output
is rather alarming too. You should not have 500 megs used, unless you
are say, running a server with many, many concurrent connections.
Y
I will post the output from free later. I rebooted recently, so the
usage is not quite up there yet. However, I think that your free output
is rather alarming too. You should not have 500 megs used, unless you
are say, running a server with many, many concurrent connections. You
are allready us
y, the memory used by the offending process should grow.
>
> -Ted
>
> > Subject: Re: ps, top and free From: Skip Morrow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED] Organization: Date: 05 Jun 2003 18:02:46 -0400 Reply-To: [EMAIL
> > PROTECTED] On Thu, 2003-06-0
Skip,
You should be able to determine what process is causing the problem by
using 'ps -aux' to track the memory usage of the processes. As the day
goes by, the memory used by the offending process should grow.
-Ted
Subject: Re: ps, top and free From: Skip Morrow <[EMAIL P
Skip Morrow wrote:
I had noticed that I didn't have much free memory a few days ago (I had
384M RAM installed) so I went and bought another 256 and installed it
(totalling 640M) Restarted the computer and saw that I was only using
20% of the RAM. But after a few hours, I noticed that the little g
On Thu, 2003-06-05 at 17:26, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Skip Morrow wrote:
> > Quick and dirty: Why don't the memory usages reported for each program
> > from 'ps -aux' and/or 'top' (even after pressing the "H") add up to the
> > totals as being reported by 'top' and/or 'free'? Try it and you'll see
Skip Morrow wrote:
Quick and dirty: Why don't the memory usages reported for each program
from 'ps -aux' and/or 'top' (even after pressing the "H") add up to the
totals as being reported by 'top' and/or 'free'? Try it and you'll see
what I mean.
Variety of reasons:
Some processes share memory. D
Skip Morrow wrote:
Wow. Thanks for the help. That clears things up a lot. I guess what
got me going was the gnome cpu monitor app for the taskbar was showing a
very high percentage of RAM use, so that got me looking around.
Yes, it isn't terribly clear about the distinction between application
Quick and dirty: Why don't the memory usages reported for each program
from 'ps -aux' and/or 'top' (even after pressing the "H") add up to the
totals as being reported by 'top' and/or 'free'? Try it and you'll see
what I mean.
Skip
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
10 matches
Mail list logo
