Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-24 Thread Rodolfo J. Paiz
At 4/24/2002 09:48 AM +0800, you wrote: > > And my sendmail.cf file is set to "background", which is what I would > > think I want. But it seems to act as though it's set to "q"... > > > > -Michael You might want to try simply saving a copy of your sendmail.mc file, then reinstalling latest sen

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-23 Thread Edward Dekkers
> And my sendmail.cf file is set to "background", which is what I would think I > want. But it seems to act as though it's set to "q"... > > -Michael Yep, background is correct. That is what mine is set to and it sends immediately. Was worth a shot. Hope you find the problem. Regards, Edward.

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-23 Thread Michael George
I tried some things and it seems that I have to restart sendmail twice for changes in the /etc/sendmail.cf file to take effect. Seems odd... Anyway, if I have "MinQueueAge=0" in the config file, then the messages will be relayed immediately. However, if I'm not online then the sendmail daemon d

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-23 Thread Michael George
Okay, this is annoying... I made the changes that I mentioned in previous responses. They didn't seem to work so I changed the settings back and restarted sendmail (I also restarted it after making the changes...). But now it seems to send the mail out immediately, just like I'd expect... I am

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-23 Thread Michael George
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:04:40AM +0200, Pieter De Wit wrote: > Hello Michael, > > Does it just sit in the queue ? I am sure that when the queue is next run (60min cycles) it would go out. However, I have a dial-up connection so I need it to try immediately (and I also kick the queue every time

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-23 Thread Michael George
On Tue, Apr 23, 2002 at 10:54:48AM +0800, Edward Dekkers wrote: > > If anyone has any other suggestions, please let me know! > > Only one thing springs to mind: > > DeliveryMode=deferred/immediate > > Not sure exact syntax but I think the option is definitively called > DeliveryMode Yes, I not

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-23 Thread Michael George
On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 10:40:39PM -0400, Anthony E. Greene wrote: > > Actually, the man page says this: > > MinQueueAge=timeout > Sets how long a job must ferment in the queue > between attempts to send it. > > > That's not as clear as it could be, but it see

RE: sendmail queuing

2002-04-23 Thread Pieter De Wit
Hello Michael, Does it just sit in the queue ? -Original Message- From: Michael George [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: 23 April 2002 03:18 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: sendmail queuing I just noticed a new behavior on my system that I don't think was there b

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-22 Thread Edward Dekkers
> If anyone has any other suggestions, please let me know! > > -Michael Only one thing springs to mind: DeliveryMode=deferred/immediate Not sure exact syntax but I think the option is definitively called DeliveryMode Regards, Edward. ___ Redhat-l

Re: sendmail queuing

2002-04-22 Thread Anthony E. Greene
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Mon, Apr 22, 2002 at 09:17:48PM -0400, Michael George wrote: >The default has "MinQueueAge=30m" which sets how long a message sets between >queue attempts. Perhaps this is it? I would think, though, that this would >be for the time between failed

sendmail queuing

2002-04-22 Thread Michael George
I just noticed a new behavior on my system that I don't think was there before upgrading to enigma... When I send mail from mutt, it will fire up sendmail, fork a process and send out the mail. However, when I access sendmail via port 25 (like from Netscape or from a client machine) the mail wil