On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:08, Brian Ashe wrote:
> On Thursday January 16, 2003 02:33, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > The problem is largely in that sendmail uses mbox files, and a couple of
> > users leave mail on the server though they're told not to, and they eat
> > all of the disk bandwidth (every ma
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:50 AM
> Subject: Re: sizing server for sendmail & mailscanner
>
>
> > Roger Schmeits wrote:
> >
> > >How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
> > >Using sendmail & m
On a similar topic. What do people recommend for mail scanning
s/w under linux?
Thanks,
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Bart Schelstraete" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: sizing server for
** Reply to message from Gordon Messmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> on Thu, 16 Jan 2003
15:13:22 -0800
> On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:36, Jack Bowling wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:33:29AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> > >
> > > The whole thing takes less than a day to set up. NFS is available on
Thanks to all who replied. I got a lot of useful info out this!
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "Gerry Doris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 4:46 PM
Subject: Re: sizing server for sendmail & mailscanner
> On Th
On Thu, 16 Jan 2003, Mike McMullen wrote:
> On a similar topic. What do people recommend for mail scanning
> s/w under linux?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
Install F-Prot + MailScanner for virii. Install SpamAssassin + Vipul's
Razor + MailScanner for spam. Put them all in for both virus and spam
sca
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:36, Jack Bowling wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:33:29AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> >
> > The whole thing takes less than a day to set up. NFS is available on a
> > standard Server install of RHL, but I use this kickstart file instead:
> > http://rh-install.progne
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 11:43, David Busby wrote:
> Reading this response reminds me why (one of the reasons) I started using
> Postfix,
I don't really know what you mean by that, but every workload will be
different. My server is set up in an enterprise environment, where
email is a critical funct
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 12:17, Roger Schmeits wrote:
>
> > right now, (peak hours) the load on the box is 1.19
>
> What this 1.19, .7, .8 figures that everyone is using. Can I assume
> that is messages per second?
The load is the average number of processes during a given time
(/proc/loadavg l
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 12:17
Subject: Re: sizing server for sendmail & mailscanner
>
> > right now, (peak hours) the load on the box is 1.19
>
> What this 1.19, .7, .8 figures that everyone is using. Can I assume
> that is message
> right now, (peak hours) the load on the box is 1.19
What this 1.19, .7, .8 figures that everyone is using. Can I assume
that is messages per second?
-
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?subject=unsubscribe
https://listman.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/redhat
On Thu, Jan 16, 2003 at 11:33:29AM -0800, Gordon Messmer wrote:
>
> The whole thing takes less than a day to set up. NFS is available on a
> standard Server install of RHL, but I use this kickstart file instead:
> http://rh-install.prognet.com/kickstart/ks-73-default.cfg
> Set up the NFS share an
Gordon Messmer,
On Thursday January 16, 2003 02:33, Gordon Messmer wrote:
> Well, we are supporting only about 1000 users with sendmail and
> spamassassin (run via spamc) alone (no virus scanning, that is) on a
> dual 1Ghz P3 system with 2GB of RAM. Performance is awful, and the load
> is around
ursday, January 16, 2003 11:33
Subject: Re: sizing server for sendmail & mailscanner
> On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 08:25, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> > How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
> > Using sendmail & mailscanner.
>
> On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 09
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 08:25, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
> Using sendmail & mailscanner.
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 09:35, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> We have about 150 faculty members with 600 student accounts and are
> looking to and 3000 alumni m
> On a similar topic. What do people recommend for mail scanning
> s/w under linux?
I'm very happy with RAV anti-virus. Works on linux (i386 and sparc),
freebsd, solaris, and supports sendmail, qmail, exim, postfix and courier
out of the box. Very easy to install. The configuration is perhaps not
On a similar topic. What do people recommend for mail scanning
s/w under linux?
Thanks,
Mike
Mike McMullen
CIO - Baton, Inc.
7637 Fair Oaks Blvd Suite #2
Carmichael, CA 95608
Tel: 1-866-515-4421 or 916-944-7790 ext. 2
Fax: 1-866-843-8795 or 916-944-8422
Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W
Irwin,
Thanks. I'll check them out.
Mike
- Original Message -
From: "irwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, January 16, 2003 9:54 AM
Subject: Re: sizing server for sendmail & mailscanner
> On Thursday 16 January 2003 09:
On Thursday 16 January 2003 09:40 am, you wrote:
> On a similar topic. What do people recommend for mail scanning
> s/w under linux?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Mike
Installed MailScanner and Spamassassin this week. Working great.
Irwin
--
redhat-list mailing list
unsubscribe mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]?s
On Thu, 2003-01-16 at 10:50, Bart Schelstraete wrote:
> Roger Schmeits wrote:
>
> >How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
> >Using sendmail & mailscanner.
> >
> >
>
> For sendmail you don't need a lot of resources, but it depends on your
> mailscanner.
> What kind of mai
Only 5000? Not a whole heck of a lot.
On 16 Jan 2003, Roger Schmeits wrote:
> How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
> Using sendmail & mailscanner.
>
> Thanks.
>
>
>
>
>
>
--
Mike Burger
http://www.bubbanfriends.org
Visit the Dog Pound II BBS
telnet://dogpound2.
> For sendmail you don't need a lot of resources, but it depends on your
> mailscanner.
> What kind of mailscanner do you want to use?
We use mcaffee here but are looking for another one (sophos?). Will
include this cost into the next budget year.
>
> For a good performance with scanning e-mail
> Unless you mean emails for 5000 users a day. Then I would say
> big fat piles of machine.
We have about 150 faculty members with 600 student accounts and are
looking to and 3000 alumni members accounts in the spring (eeek!).
Always considered myself a small time admin -- nothing like this.
Kin
Roger Schmeits wrote:
How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
Using sendmail & mailscanner.
For sendmail you don't need a lot of resources, but it depends on your
mailscanner.
What kind of mailscanner do you want to use?
For a good performance with scanning e-mails for
Roger Schmeits wrote:
How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
Using sendmail & mailscanner.
Thanks.
not much.
Unless you mean emails for 5000 users a day. Then I would say
big fat piles of machine.
I am running sendmail + mailscanner + sophos on a p2/500
with 1/
How much horsepower do I need for scanning 5000 emails a day?
Using sendmail & mailscanner.
Thanks.
--
**
Roger Schmeits
System Analyst
Clarkson College
http://www.clarksoncollege.edu
Omaha, NE USA
1-800-647-5500 x22542
*
--
26 matches
Mail list logo
