Re: [regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-22

Hi Murray, Il 28/07/2023 02:43, Murray S. Kucherawy ha scritto: On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 4:07 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: * Section 3 should probably specify what should happen if the JSONpath refers to an attribute/value that's not present in the object it's referenci

Re: [regext] Proposed update to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai

Jim, It’s too bad that you didn’t weigh in when I requested for opinions with the mailing list thread https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/regext/V5znHXurkApuTJaL_GOyQUYMddw/ in March. For SMTPUTF8 to be used, there must be a policy decision made by all three R’s (Registry, Registrar, and Re

Re: [regext] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-regext-rdap-reverse-search-22

On Wed, Jul 26, 2023 at 4:07 AM Mario Loffredo wrote: > > > >> * Section 3 should probably specify what should happen if the JSONpath >> refers to an attribute/value that's not present in the object it's >> referencing. >> >> [ML] The JSONPath expressions related to reverse search properties are

Re: [regext] Proposed update to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai

Speaking as an individual, I don’t believe this responds to the issue at hand. I understand this to be suggesting that EPP is telling the world that a registrant is welcome to use an SMTPUTF8 email address and the rest of the world is out of luck if you can’t handle that email address. Well,

Re: [regext] Proposed update to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai

Andy, Yes, that is correct. -- JG James Gould Fellow Engineer jgo...@verisign.com 703-948-3271 12061 Bluemont Way Reston, VA 20190 Verisign.com On 7/27/23, 1:58 PM, "Andrew Newton" mailto:a...@hxr.us>> wrote: Caution: This email originated from outsid

Re: [regext] Proposed update to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai

In other words, if the SMTPUTF8 email fails there are other types of communication (postal mail, phone) available. In practical terms, an all-ASCII email can fail as well, so this should not change business practices. This sounds good to me, James. -andy On Thu, Jul 27, 2023 at 9:48 AM Gould, Ja

[regext] Proposed update to draft-ietf-regext-epp-eai

Based on the discussion that occurred at the IETF-117 REGEXT meeting, I took the action item to cover the topic of the alternate ASCII e-mail. To address this, I defined a new “Alternate Communication Considerations” section with the following content for consideration: RFC 6530 [RFC6530]

Re: [regext] [Ext] [DNSOP] Best Practices for Managing Existing Delegations When Deleting a Domain or Host

James, My comments are embedded below with JG2. In summary, the concept of leveraging the domain pending delete period to cascade down to the child hosts and host to domain links (e.g., name servers), with the ability to rollback with a domain restore command, is interesting to investigate for