Hello,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:37:07PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2001 10:57, Totoro wrote:
Hi,
I've been running a single processor, ICP Vortex Raid 0+1, LVM, Reiserfs to
an NFS server. I tried to load this server with 10 clients and it crashed
with
On Thursday 12 July 2001 14:09, Totoro wrote:
Hello,
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:37:07PM +0200, Christian Mayrhuber wrote:
On Thursday 12 July 2001 10:57, Totoro wrote:
Hi,
I've been running a single processor, ICP Vortex Raid 0+1, LVM,
Reiserfs to an NFS server. I tried to load
On Mit, 04 Jul 2001, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
You might want to use a fix for reiserfs_readdir's bug fix found recently.
This fix missed 2.4.6
Thanks,
vs
--- dir.c~Wed Jul 4 14:52:37 2001
+++ dir.c Wed Jul 4 14:53:43 2001
@@ -172,7 +172,7 @@
// user space
Hi Dirk!
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Dirk Mueller wrote:
--- dir.c~ Wed Jul 4 14:52:37 2001
+++ dir.cWed Jul 4 14:53:43 2001
[..]
This chunk is still missing in 2.4.7-pre6. Is it possible to submit this to
Linus ?
You are perfectly right and for me it shows that there are some problems
On Thursday, July 12, 2001 06:09:55 PM +0200 Stefan Fleiter [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hi Dirk!
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Dirk Mueller wrote:
--- dir.c~ Wed Jul 4 14:52:37 2001
+++ dir.c Wed Jul 4 14:53:43 2001
[..]
This chunk is still missing in 2.4.7-pre6. Is it possible to
Christian Gottschalch wrote:
re All !
i've to set up a low coast filer(NFS-Server)on an dual
intel(866MHz) machine, an icp scsi raid controller, an
easyraid(HW-Raid with 250Gig) now i've to check some
filesystems(reiserfs,xfs,jfs,gfs...), how stable it works, performace etc. now i
need an
I just started configuring my new 2.4.6 kernel and thought that i
noticed a few differences from my stock mandrake 8.0 2.4.3mdk kernel,
but dismissed it thinking maybe they had been relocated..When i got to
the filesystem support and saw that reiserfs wasn't listed i knew
something was wrong.
On Thursday 12 July 2001 20:07, Phil Martinez wrote:
I just started configuring my new 2.4.6 kernel and thought that i
noticed a few differences from my stock mandrake 8.0 2.4.3mdk
kernel, but dismissed it thinking maybe they had been relocated..When
i got to the filesystem support and saw
Hi Chris!
On Thu, 12 Jul 2001 Chris Mason wrote:
Bug fixes need testing, regardless of how correct they look.
You are right, yes.
But I think there often are patches sent to the Mailinglist you don't hear
about for a long time and at least seem to have been lost. Dirk is one of
those who
I have looked through the archive and seen a lot of talk..but can we please
get a definative list of patches that CAN be applied to the 2.4.6 kernel.
I have seen that the umount patch is no longer needed but some people have
said that you nees some patch-A-ReiserGen patch, but i see two on the
On Thursday, July 12, 2001 02:09:19 AM +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Hello Chris,
I have a chicken egg problem with ReiserFS LVM on an IDE RAID-0+1 (Highpoint
HPT370) with Linux 2.4.6-ac2+ and SuSE 7.2.
Yes, SuSE 7.2 is 2.4.4 only but I think 2.4.6 (at least) is needed
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 01:06:31PM -0400, Chris Mason wrote:
this more with O_SYNC writes (reiserfs O_SYNC is faster without LVM). But,
it sounds like andrea and the LVM guys are working on it, so I don't expect
it to be a problem much longer. The transaction tracking patch I just
Yes, the
On Thu, Jul 12, 2001 at 09:35:20PM +0400, Hans Reiser wrote:
Hi Linda,
This seems very much in line with what Reiser4 is doing for DARPA, and what SE Linux
is doing for
the NSA. Or at least what Linus told the SE Linux folks he would like them to
write.:-)
I am quite supportive of what
13 matches
Mail list logo
