[reiserfs-list] Re: DMA timeout

2001-11-21 Thread Vladimir V. Saveliev
Hi Leandro Lucarella wrote: > Hi! Me again... and again with DMA time-out... this time it looks like > reiserfs was not afected but it made a few kernel panics... > > It looks like a kernel 2.4.14 problem the time-out stuff, so I'm going back > to my 2.4.10, but reiserfs doesn't have to die beca

Re: [reiserfs-list] data loss after fsync?

2001-11-21 Thread Vladimir V. Saveliev
Hi Andreas Dilger wrote: > On Nov 21, 2001 15:06 +0300, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: > > Toby Dickenson wrote: > > > I asked this on the list a while back but got no replies. I hope you > > > werent ignoring me for a reason, and I hope you dont mind me > > > repeating > > > > > > Consider th

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2001 23:51 schrieb Andreas Dilger: > So, you have a lot of bad inodes in /dev, do this (untested, but easily > reversible): > > mv /dev /.badattr > mkdir /dev > lsattr -d /dev > > Hopefully /dev is created without any attributes. If it is, then you need > to find a dire

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Ed Tomlinson
On November 21, 2001 03:16 am, Andreas Dilger wrote: > In any case, it is also a bad thing to leave garbage in unused parts of > on-disk data structs for just this reason, so mkreiserfs should zero > everything that is unused inside allocated structs (and the kernel too, > because reiserfs alloca

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Stuart Young
At 11:24 AM 21/11/01 +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: >Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2001 11:02 schrieb Nikita Danilov: > > > Yes, it's right, but currently we have what we have currently. I am > > going to extend inode-attrs.patch and add new mount option > > "noattrs". With it ioctls to set and get attri

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Philippe Gramoullé
Hi Just a follow up to Dieter's figures (2.4.15-pre8 + [A-M] patches) 2550 controller RAID 5 PowerVault 210S , PERC3/QC 161J Firmware. 50s for ./dbench 32 to complete. # date;./dbench 32;date Wed Nov 21 18:07:34 CET 2001 ...32 clients started ...

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Nov 21, 2001 22:58 +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2001 22:20 schrieb Andreas Dilger: > > The normal ext2 solution in this case is "move it all to a separate dir, > > cp -a from the old dir, and then wait for e2fsck to clean up". > > Sorry, I don't understand you, her

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2001 22:20 schrieb Andreas Dilger: > On Nov 21, 2001 21:19 +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Some files are _NOT_ deleteable even as root, argh? > > The normal ext2 solution in this case is "move it all to a separate dir, > cp -a from the old dir, and then wait for e2fsck

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Mittwoch, 21. November 2001 22:20 schrieb Andreas Dilger: > On Nov 21, 2001 21:19 +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote: > > Some files are _NOT_ deleteable even as root, argh? > > The normal ext2 solution in this case is "move it all to a separate dir, > cp -a from the old dir, and then wait for e2fsck

Re: [reiserfs-list] Re: [REISERFS TESTING] new patches on ftp.namesys.com: 2.4.15-pre7

2001-11-21 Thread Andreas Dilger
On Nov 21, 2001 21:19 +0100, Dieter N?tzel wrote: > Some files are _NOT_ deleteable even as root, argh? The normal ext2 solution in this case is "move it all to a separate dir, cp -a from the old dir, and then wait for e2fsck to clean up". Since reiserfsck won't do thisyet , just consider it a

[reiserfs-list] New time-out and reiserfs fails

2001-11-21 Thread Leandro Lucarella
Hi! Me again... and again with DMA time-out... this time it looks like reiserfs was not afected but it made a few kernel panics... It looks like a kernel 2.4.14 problem the time-out stuff, so I'm going back to my 2.4.10, but reiserfs doesn't have to die because of a DMA time-out, don't it? Here a