btinsley wrote:
What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems
with almost zero impact on performance. Some devices are reportedly
Hello
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 18:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
human aspect : lots of work on a hardrive that I can't access
thanks for your help
Léo
technicaly :
The problem :
reiserfsck 3.6.17 (2003 www.namesys.com)
returns
please get reiserfsck 3.6.19
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
| devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems
Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
| devices, can run periodic background consistency
26 2005 23:36 Flavien Bridault
(a):
Hi people,
I searched a bit on the mail archive and I didn't find anything about
that except about the devel gcc4.0 tree.
With stable gcc4.0 reiser4progs fails to compile because of three
static declarations that follows a non-static declarations. I
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Then Hans should setup a paypal account for donations. I'd gladly give
what I can spare, and I think so would a lot of people here.
http://namesys.com/support.html
I've donated that way and it's worked every time.
Maybe some
Le vendredi 27 mai 2005 15:11 +0400, Vitaly a crit :
26 2005 23:36 Flavien
Bridault (a):
Hi people,
I searched a bit on the mail archive and I didn't find anything about
that except about the devel gcc4.0 tree.
With stable gcc4.0 reiser4progs fails to compile because of three
Hi !
I have done debugreiserfs -p to collect metadata .. .I take me about
15 hours but its ok.
I have put the file here :
http://www.euphorik.ch/boardel/debugreiserfs_metadata.bz2 (23Mo)
unfortunately I have failed to unpack metadata, they got corrupted
somehow, but I see at least that fs
27 2005 19:07 Flavien Bridault
(a):
Le vendredi 27 mai 2005 15:11 +0400, Vitaly a crit :
26 2005 23:36 Flavien
Bridault (a):
Hi people,
I searched a bit on the mail archive and I didn't find anything about
that except about the devel gcc4.0 tree.
With stable
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern
I'd rather donate for a reiser4 online repacker. By the time
something's fsck'd, so to speak, I'd rather take it offline and possibly
pull in backups. But a repacker (even an offine one) and a resizer
(even an offline one) are two things that we even have in the Linux
ntfs-tools, and it's
Leo Comerford wrote on Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:38 +0100:
But if you have relation-directories and the ability to find the
pathnames of a given file, you can do everything you can do with
subfiles, just as nicely, and more besides. And if subfiles are
completely redundant and bad news anyway, we
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans, comment please? Is this approaching v5 / v6 / Future Vision? It
does seem more than a little clunky when applied to v4...
Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
Leo Comerford wrote on Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:38 +0100:
But if you have
I've been using your product for 4 months now. I've increased my length from
2 inches
to nearly 6 inches. Your product has saved my sex life.-Matt, FL
My girlfriend loves the results, but she doesn't know what I do. She thinks
it's natural-Thomas, CA
Pleasure your partner every time with a
14 matches
Mail list logo
