Hello
On Thu, 2005-05-26 at 18:52, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> human aspect : lots of work on a hardrive that I can't access
>
> thanks for your help
> Léo
>
> technicaly :
>
> The problem :
>
> reiserfsck 3.6.17 (2003 www.namesys.com)
> returns
please get reiserfsck 3.6.19
(ftp://ftp.namesys.c
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
| devices, can run periodic background consistency checks on filesystems
Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
Hello,
On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
btinsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
| What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
| mounted read-write. Many modern filesystems, especially those on NAS
| devices, can run periodic background consistenc
В сообщении от Четверг 26 Май 2005 23:36 Flavien Bridault
написал(a):
> Hi people,
>
> I searched a bit on the mail archive and I didn't find anything about
> that except about the devel gcc4.0 tree.
>
> With stable gcc4.0 reiser4progs fails to compile because of three
> "static declarations that
On Fri, May 27, 2005 at 10:32:14AM +0100, Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
>Then Hans should setup a paypal account for donations. I'd gladly give
>what I can spare, and I think so would a lot of people here.
http://namesys.com/support.html
I've donated that way and it's worked every time.
Maybe som
Le vendredi 27 mai 2005 à 15:11 +0400, Vitaly a écrit :
> В сообщении от Четверг 26 Май 2005 23:36 Flavien
> Bridault написал(a):
> > Hi people,
> >
> > I searched a bit on the mail archive and I didn't find anything about
> > that except about the devel gcc4.0 tree.
> >
> > With stable gcc4.0 rei
> Hi !
> I have done "debugreiserfs -p" to collect metadata .. .I take me about
> 15 hours but its ok.
> I have put the file here :
> http://www.euphorik.ch/boardel/debugreiserfs_metadata.bz2 (23Mo)
unfortunately I have failed to unpack metadata, they got corrupted
somehow, but I see at least th
В сообщении от Пятница 27 Май 2005 19:07 Flavien Bridault
написал(a):
> Le vendredi 27 mai 2005 à 15:11 +0400, Vitaly a écrit :
> > В сообщении от Четверг 26 Май 2005 23:36 Flavien
> > Bridault написал(a):
> > > Hi people,
> > >
> > > I searched a bit on the mail archive and I didn't find anythin
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote:
> Philippe Gramoullé wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> On Tue, 24 May 2005 22:02:20 -0500
>> btinsley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> | What i'm looking for is a check on a reiserfs filesystem that is
>> | mounted read-write. Many
> I'd rather donate for a reiser4 online repacker. By the time
> something's fsck'd, so to speak, I'd rather take it offline and possibly
> pull in backups. But a repacker (even an offine one) and a resizer
> (even an offline one) are two things that we even have in the Linux
> ntfs-tools, and it
Leo Comerford wrote on Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:38 +0100:
> But if you have relation-directories and the ability to find the
> pathnames of a given file, you can do everything you can do with
> subfiles, just as nicely, and more besides. And if subfiles are
> completely redundant and bad news anyway,
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hans, comment please? Is this approaching v5 / v6 / Future Vision? It
does seem more than a little "clunky" when applied to v4...
Alexander G. M. Smith wrote:
> Leo Comerford wrote on Wed, 18 May 2005 12:50:38 +0100:
>
>>But if you have relation-di
I've been using your product for 4 months now. I've increased my length from
2 inches
to nearly 6 inches. Your product has saved my sex life.-Matt, FL
My girlfriend loves the results, but she doesn't know what I do. She thinks
it's natural-Thomas, CA
Pleasure your partner every time with a bigge
Hello
On Fri, 2005-05-27 at 19:17, Vitaly wrote:
> > Hi !
> > I have done "debugreiserfs -p" to collect metadata .. .I take me about
> > 15 hours but its ok.
> > I have put the file here :
> > http://www.euphorik.ch/boardel/debugreiserfs_metadata.bz2 (23Mo)
>
> unfortunately I have failed to unp
14 matches
Mail list logo
