Re: Partition full after deleting a large file

2007-02-02 Thread Sander
think you should get your space back if you exit X. With kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: Crash Corse in Partition Recovery

2006-10-18 Thread Sander Sweers
Sander [1] http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk [2] http://www.cgsecurity.org/testdisk-6.4.linuxstatic.tar.bz2

Re: Hans Reiser arrested...

2006-10-11 Thread Sander Sweers
. The question if reiser4 will continue is IMHO a bit insensitive when compared to the situation they are in. Sander

Re: Hans Reiser arrested...

2006-10-11 Thread Sander Sweers
Tracy R Reed wrote: Sander Sweers wrote: I would instead hope Nina is found and both can be reunited with their kids. The question if reiser4 will continue is IMHO a bit insensitive when compared to the situation they are in. I understand your temptation to take this position and engage

Reiser4 for 2.6.18

2006-10-05 Thread Sander Sweers
Hello Devs, Is it possible that you can make a patch for 2.6.18 vanilla? I have tried to extract the patches from mm and apply to vanilla but this fails to build. 2.6.18-MM oopses so that is also out. Thanks Sander

Re: Ebuild/rpm/deb repo's (was Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...)

2006-08-08 Thread Sander Sweers
do emulation but if possible they will pass instruction directly to the hardware without emulating vias a hypervisor. Good reading on virtualization on 2. Greets Sander [1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualization [2] http://www.kernelthread.com/publications/virtualization/

Re: Experimental Reiser4-enabled Ubuntu kernels ready for testing

2006-08-07 Thread Sander Sweers
is the general Howto list for as many as 2 distro's, Gentoo and Ubuntu! Greets Sander

Re: Ebuild/rpm/deb repo's (was Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...)

2006-08-03 Thread Sander Sweers
it is better to get in contact with the 2 people from this link. https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Reiser4 David is a former gentoo users and was the one who maintained the love-sources. The only e-mail address I could find for him was [EMAIL PROTECTED] (his jabber but it looks ok. Greets Sander

Ebuild/rpm/deb repo's (was Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...)

2006-08-01 Thread Sander Sweers
cummunity can help out the namesys devs? Greets Sander

Re: Ebuild/rpm/deb repo's (was Re: reiser4 can now bear with filled fs, looks stable to me...)

2006-08-01 Thread Sander Sweers
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote: Hello Sander, Hey Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 8:10:34 PM, you wrote: Yes, and in case of gentoo there are already people maintaining an ebuild which pull in r4 on the wiki. http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Reiser4_With_Gentoo-Sources

Re: future r4 maintenance question

2006-07-23 Thread Sander Sweers
to implement a filesystems. Greets Sander

Re: bad bread

2006-05-08 Thread Sander
or .. With kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: REISER4 problem,

2006-05-04 Thread Sander
. That sounds more like a broken disk than a Reiser4 error. Can you post the error messages from dmesg? With kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: reiserfs performance on ssd

2006-04-27 Thread Sander
myself.. Kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: reiserfs performance on ssd

2006-04-27 Thread Sander
the iram use pci slot for power purpose. then where is this pci slot limit coming from? The sata controller is on pci. Btw, pci is not a slot per se. Kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: Bug report: reiserfsck --rebuild-tree not progressing

2006-04-11 Thread Sander
, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: Reiser4 stability

2006-03-23 Thread Sander
enough.. I use it on my desktop and a few servers, some since early 2005. Never caused me serious trouble (save for the major performance regression late 2005 - early 2006). Reiserfs (v3) also never let me down. Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: Re: Wtr.: Re: 2.6.15.1+reiser4 Kernel Panic

2006-01-31 Thread Sander
as they don't have a proven track record yet (pun intended ;-). Kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: Reiser4 slowdown gone

2006-01-30 Thread Sander
Joe Feise wrote (ao): Sander wrote on 01/29/06 23:25: Andrew Morton wrote (ao): ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm4/ +reiser4-big-update-bug-fix-for-readpage-fix.patch +reiser4-warnings-cleanup.patch +reiser4-do-not-use

Troubles after --rebuild-tree

2006-01-11 Thread Sander van Beek
. We do have the logfile and the lost+found directory full or files. Is there any chance to repair the damage done with these two, or at least get some data back? How can this be done? Or should we leave it up to the expert? Any help or suggestions would be appreciated. Regards, Sander

Re: Collect data? (was: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2)

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao): On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:09, Sander wrote: My 'good' system: kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2 OS: Debian Sid disks: 4x sata on Promise raid/lvm/etc: lmv stripe My 'bad' system: kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm1

Re: Collect data?

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): Sander wrote: Reiser-dev team, do you need other info beside what is listed there? It could be useful if there were a description of a test which was used to measure slowdown, result of that test on both good and bad kernels. Information about good kernel

Re: Collect data?

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao): For Sander's list: http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c strace -T -e sync,fsync reiser4-fsync I've added this one, but it segfaults at my system: $ gcc -o reiser4-fsync reiser4-fsync.c $ strace -T -e sync,fsync ./reiser4-fsync Segmentation fault Any

Re: Collect data?

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao): On Wednesday 23 November 2005 13:17, Sander wrote: Hesse, Christian wrote (ao): For Sander's list: http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c strace -T -e sync,fsync reiser4-fsync I've added this one, but it segfaults at my system: $ gcc -o

Re: Collect data?

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): Please unapply the attached patch and check whether it makes any effect. Is there any risk involved in testing this patch? And is this a real patch which fixes a real problem, or is it a test? cd fs/reiser4 cat patch | patch -p1 -R diff --git

Re: Collect data?

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): Sander wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): Please unapply the attached patch and check whether it makes any effect. Is there any risk involved in testing this patch? It should not. The only problem it will cause is not updating atime on accessing

Re: Collect data?

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): Sander wrote: Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): No. This is not a fix. This is a patch which I suspect is responsible for sync performance drop. It fixes old reiser4 bug known as not updating atime. I asked you to reverse this patch to check whether

Re: More Slowdown - testscript [noatime,nodiratime]

2005-11-23 Thread Sander
Hans Reiser wrote (ao): Craig Shelley wrote: With the noatime and nodiratime options, the problem of accessing files causing a massive sync time has gone. See the results below. Although this option has made the system useable, I don't think it has fully solved the problem. I think fsync()

Re: More Slowdown

2005-11-22 Thread Sander
Marcel Hilzinger wrote (ao): Did you ever think about, that this is not a reiser4 problem, but a kernel bug or a problem related to hal? Suse 10 has big problems with external USB drives using sync as mount option. They used sync already in 9.3 but with 2.6.11 there were no such problems.

Re: More Slowdown

2005-11-22 Thread Sander
Marcel Hilzinger wrote (ao): Am Dienstag, 22. November 2005 11:38 schrieb Sander: Marcel Hilzinger wrote (ao): Did you ever think about, that this is not a reiser4 problem, but a kernel bug or a problem related to hal? Suse 10 has big problems with external USB drives using sync

Collect data? (was: Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2)

2005-11-22 Thread Sander
E.Gryaznova wrote (ao): Sander wrote: # echo foo /boot/test # time vim +s/foo/bar/ +wq /boot/test real0m0.016s user0m0.000s sys 0m0.000s # echo foo /root/test # time vim +s/foo/bar/ +wq /root/test real0m9.667s user0m0.000s sys 0m0.020s /dev/hda2 on / type

Re: More Slowdown or reiser4 update for 2.6.14-mm2

2005-11-21 Thread Sander
E.Gryaznova wrote (ao): Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you please provide more info?: FWIW, I notice the same (I'm not the OP). My main workstation (Athlon) runs 2.6.15-rc1-mm1. Vim needs 4 to 12 seconds to close any file, mutt is very slow on sending email,

Re: reiserfsck --rebuild-tree failure

2005-11-16 Thread Sander
. After that, mount the image and see what is left. Hope this helps, kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: reiser4 in 2.6.14 - lockups with mmapped files

2005-11-01 Thread Sander
Fionn Behrens wrote (ao): On Di, 2005-11-01 at 19:25 +0300, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote: Can you please check what fs/reiser4/reiser4.h:REISER4_USE_EFLUSH is set to? If it is 0, please try your test having it set to 1. It is set to 0. I changed it to 1. What is the supposed result of this

Re: Fwd: My Dad suggests a redundant copies plugin

2005-10-27 Thread Sander
Gregory Maxwell wrote (ao): On 10/25/05, Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That will kill performance badly. First of all the two read/writes needed, and second because you have to seek from one end to the disk to the other every time you read/write something. Kill it worse for writes than

Re: My Dad suggests a redundant copies plugin

2005-10-25 Thread Sander
Hans Reiser wrote (ao): This would not be (at least in theory) useful for RAID devices, but for a user with a single disk drive, it might be useful to have a plugin that creates two (or N) copies, and tries to allocate the two copies at opposite ends of the disk. Anyone out there still looking

Re: My Dad suggests a redundant copies plugin

2005-10-25 Thread Sander
Hans Reiser wrote (ao): It is only for very important files for computers which have only one hard drive. Some of the work is with changing fsck. Well, if the files are important, then you should have backups anyway, whatever raid or similar you have. I still don't see an advantage in

Re: undelete a file

2005-10-15 Thread Sander
ch4os wrote (ao): Anyway to undelete them? or recover them... I had just backuped them up and was going to move them to a new backup location on an external drive... If you just made a backup, why don't you just retrieve the files from the archive? After all, that is what you make

Re: Reiser4 problems on gentoo 2.6.14-rc1-mm1

2005-10-12 Thread Sander
V?clav H?la wrote (ao): Dne st?eda 12 ??jna 2005 13:17 Vladimir V. Saveliev napsal(a): I believe it is fixed in 2.6.14-rc2-mm2. Please use it. PS: if it still does not work - try to set REISER4_USE_EFLUSH macro (it is in file fs/reiser4/reiser4.h) to 1. If that does not help - please

Re: corrupted disk

2005-10-11 Thread Sander
Peter Nixon wrote (ao): At 06:15 this morning the following errors showed up in /var/log/messages Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: kernel BUG at prints.c:334! Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: invalid operand: 2.4.21-138-smp #1 SMP Fri Oct 31 00:51:31 UTC 2003 Oct 11 06:15:03

Re: corrupted disk

2005-10-11 Thread Sander
Peter Nixon wrote (ao): On Tuesday 11 October 2005 16:31, Sander wrote: Peter Nixon wrote (ao): At 06:15 this morning the following errors showed up in /var/log/messages Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: kernel BUG at prints.c:334! Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: invalid

Re: corrupted disk

2005-10-11 Thread Sander
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): Hello Sander wrote: Peter Nixon wrote (ao): On Tuesday 11 October 2005 16:31, Sander wrote: Peter Nixon wrote (ao): At 06:15 this morning the following errors showed up in /var/log/messages Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: kernel BUG at prints.c:334

Re: Reiser4 file recovery

2005-10-10 Thread Sander
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote (ao): Thanks for the suggestions guys...however I should have clarified that I no longer have the dead disk (long story...) FWIW, I'm interested in the story if you don't mind :-) so I am kind of stuck with what I have...Am I stuffed ? You just lost one-third of

Re: journal size reiserfs vs reiser4

2005-09-03 Thread Sander
% full wrt performance because of the 5% reservation? Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: Executability problem

2005-08-30 Thread Sander
Kris, please linewrap after 72 chars and refrain from posting non-relevant signatures. Kris Van Bruwaene wrote (ao): I recently discovered that scripts have become non-executable on my reiserfs share, even though the -x flags are set: [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/kris# cat tst #! /usr/bin/perl -w

Re: bad blocks on disk. Which files are damaged?

2005-08-15 Thread Sander
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao): You might want to look at http://namesys.com/bad-block-handling.html I believe it is in uptodate state. Yes, Vitaly? === Last modified: Sat Nov 1 19:24:19 2003 (maintained by Vitaly Fertman [EMAIL PROTECTED]). This document is available at

Re: grub reiser4 won't compile

2005-05-02 Thread Sander Sweers
. Sander -- After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing, after all, as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true. Spock, Amok Time stardate 3372.7

Re: grub reiser4 won't compile

2005-05-02 Thread Sander Sweers
it will be built with -m32 (just checked) and if you built it with -m64 i get the same error as you. Gentoo has a special static 32bit package if you do not run multilib, my guess is that Debian does the same with those packages. Sander -- After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing

Re: Mail System Error - Returned Mail

2005-02-25 Thread Sander
Ed Tomlinson wrote (ao): Reiserfs is a mailing list. And yes some spam does get relayed by it This mess itself, sent to the list, is SPAM. _Please_ check before sending messages like this. LoL! You don't seem to be aware of the fact that the message below is sent by a virus ;-) On Thursday

Re: reiser4progs 1.0.4

2005-02-22 Thread Sander
of fsck.reiser4 :-) Btw, I blame the corruption on the combination kernel and a forced hard-reboot during shutdown (it hung). Again, thumbs up. This all made me much more confident wrt Reiser4. With kind regards, Sander

Re: lost data

2005-02-22 Thread Sander
Micha Mutschler wrote (ao): Is there any chance to see the data on a reiserfs partition (112GB) that was formated with ext3? The answer might be 'yes'. Read this thread: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11079014621r=1w=2n=20 And especially this message:

Re: where are reiser4 sources

2005-02-21 Thread Sander Sweers
I have been using the tarball from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/. Have not had any problems with this but I do not know how up to date it is. Sander On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:16:47 +0100, Mark Junker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi, where are the Reiser4 sources? I just want to use

Re: Erased start of voulme...

2005-01-15 Thread Sander
Louis Erickson wrote (ao): On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What arguments did you use? reiserfsck --check /dev/md2 Good. Then the options Lena suggested will most likely make your data appear. What version of reiserfsck? How do I find that out? It isn't

Re: Erased start of voulme...

2005-01-13 Thread Sander
Louis Erickson wrote (ao): I don't know how it happened, but the start of the /var partition of one of the machines I run has gotten itself zeroed out. Only the first little bit - 4k or so - is nulls, then a large amount of very plausible data appears. I can't get reiserfsck to even think

Re: 2.4.21 - 2.4.25 cryptoloop mess

2005-01-09 Thread Sander
Danny Norging wrote (ao): reiserfsck-3.6.19 just finished, still nothing new in lost+found :( Thats what I did: # losetup /dev/loop0 hdc1decrypted.dump # reiserfsck --rebuild-tree -S /dev/loop0 -l reiserfsck-3.6.19.log This is after you ran this command with the older reiserfsck right? In

Re: 2.4.21 - 2.4.25 cryptoloop mess

2005-01-08 Thread Sander
Danny Norging wrote (ao): since Vitaly seems not to take notice of my mail and I cant afford another money-order (being just a student), I wonder if somebody else out there has *any* hint on what to try next. Please have a look at this First of all I would like to tell you and others (on the

reiser4 problems on amd64: things to try?

2005-01-06 Thread Sander
Hello all, Tomorrow morning I'll reinstall (and reformat to reiser3) a dual Opteron which has a troublesome reiser4 fs. Should I run some tests, or retrieve some debug info from the reiser4 fs before I reformat? -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: reiser4 problems on amd64: things to try?

2005-01-06 Thread Sander
Hi, For some reason mails to the mailinglist don't make it. Also not to the archives, but I got no error back yet. And www.namesys.com was unreachable this morning (GMT+1). Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao): On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 20:37, Sander wrote: Tomorrow morning I'll reinstall (and reformat

reiser4 on amd64 (was: Re: reiser4 for 2.6.10 and reiser4 update for 2.6.10-rc3-mm1)

2005-01-02 Thread Sander
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao): On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 21:32, Sander wrote: Does this update make reiser4 ready for Opteron systems? This update does not contain anything specific for Opteron. Do you have any problmes with reiser4 on it? I'm afraid so, yes. bonnie++ is oke, but an idle

Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up

2004-12-30 Thread Sander
Esben Stien wrote (ao): I really don't like that there is no undelete feature in reiserfs - it's not planned for reiserfs-4 either. I see desperate users all the time trying to get back what they mistakenly removed. If you 'see desperate users all the time' you might be amoung the wrong people

Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up

2004-12-30 Thread Sander
Esben Stien wrote (ao): Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Next time it is not their mistake, but instead a broken harddisk. Undelete wont save them then. We got pretty good tools to restore from a hd with bad blocks. dd it, loop it, fsck it. I'm sure a friend of mine disagrees

Re: reiser4 for 2.6.10 and reiser4 update for 2.6.10-rc3-mm1

2004-12-30 Thread Sander
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao): you can get latest reiser4 for 2.6.10 (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10/reiser4-for-2.6.10-1.gz) and update for 2.6.10-rc3-mm1 (ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10-rc3-mm1/reiser4-update-for-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-1.gz). Thank you all! Was

Re: Congratulations! we have got hash function screwed up

2004-12-30 Thread Sander
Esben Stien wrote (ao): Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: I'm sure a friend of mine disagrees with you after paying big bucks to a Norway based disk recovery company after a disk crash and zero backups. A Dutch recovery company couldn't recover the disk. Probably IBAS;). What

Re: reiser4 and apache (was: Re: Reiser4 and ZFS)

2004-12-28 Thread Sander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao): On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:28:15 +0100, Sander said: [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao): For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with more scalability and administration is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT* include lots of odd new features

Re: reiser4 and apache (was: Re: Reiser4 and ZFS)

2004-12-28 Thread Sander
Alex Zarochentsev wrote (ao): Can somebody please point me to a patch to disable the file as a directory feature? it is disabled in the recent reiser4 code. That means the latest -mm (not 2.6.10-rc3-mm1) will contain the patch too? mount options 'nopseudo' should work for older versions.

reiser4 and apache (was: Re: Reiser4 and ZFS)

2004-12-27 Thread Sander
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao): For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with more scalability and administration is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT* include lots of odd new features and quirks that might break production code (remember the joys in getting Apache running on

Re: status of reiser4

2004-12-27 Thread Sander
Jake Maciejewski wrote (ao): Have there been any reports other than Isaac's of reiser4 working on AMD64? It still doesn't work for me, and I'd like to know if I'm the only one having problems. It sort of works for me on a dual opteron on top of raid10 on top op scsi. This is 64bit and kernel

Re: AMD64 testing

2004-12-22 Thread Sander Sweers
partitions. And if I can help in any way please let me know! Thanks and regards, Sander On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:11:23 +0200, Markus Törnqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi guys! Now that I moved along to AMD64 and still have my home directory as Reiser4, I have a big incentive to get this baby stable

Re: Reoccuring corruption problem

2004-08-21 Thread Sander
Dan Nilsson wrote (ao): Sounds like bad memory nevertheless. Can you try memtest86 for at least 24 hours? Yes, I put the computer running memtest86 after getting your email and it did in fact pass all tests (after ~24hrs i aborted the test). I have fairly recently upgraded the

Re: ReiserFS and Reiser4 on AMD64?

2004-08-18 Thread Sander
Milan Holz?pfel wrote (ao): I would like know whether you can tell me some state of ReiserFS and Reiser4 on AMD64. I'm asking the the former because the gentoo docs say that ReiserFS on AMD64 is not really stable so far ([1]) and the latter because I have no idea of Reiser4's state on AMD64.

www.namesys.com down

2004-06-24 Thread Sander
Hi, I notice www.namesys.com is down for quite some time now. At first it was not pingable, but now just the webserver refuses to 'serve the web'. Is this due to the migration to reiserfs4?

Re: fsck.reiser4 can't fix 1 fixable corruption

2004-04-20 Thread Sander Sweers
...done Same problem here, same kernel and reiser4progs but this is not on lvm but a 25G partition. The way the 2 errors look the same is scary. Sander

Re: Last reiser4 snapshot is at: http://www.namesys.com/snapshots/2004.02.06/

2004-02-06 Thread Sander
Nikita Danilov wrote (ao): Sander writes: Btw, can you please make a snapshot against the -mm tree? I think that would help to get it included in that tree. Well, making two snapshots is kind of double trouble, because both has to be tested and bug reports for them have to be handled

Re: mm vs. official for reiser4.

2004-02-06 Thread Sander
and standard are so different, if people switch from standard+snapshot to -mm, it might be hard to tell if a bug is because of the different tree, of because of Reiserfs4. But you are the chief of course :-) With kind regards, Sander -- Humilis IT Services and Solutions http://www.humilis.net

Re: [reiserfs-list] pull vs. push: remind me why?

2001-09-07 Thread Robert Sander
/data/kav-04.09.01-000/ is in german, but covers the US patent 6,269,456 for McAfee which covers a push technique to deploy virus scanner updates... That's why we all have to pull... Greetings -- Robert Sander Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG Bioinformatics