think you should get your space back if you exit X.
With kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
Sander
[1] http://www.cgsecurity.org/wiki/TestDisk
[2] http://www.cgsecurity.org/testdisk-6.4.linuxstatic.tar.bz2
. The question if reiser4 will continue is IMHO a bit insensitive
when compared to the situation they are in.
Sander
Tracy R Reed wrote:
Sander Sweers wrote:
I would instead hope Nina is found and both can be reunited with their
kids. The question if reiser4 will continue is IMHO a bit insensitive
when compared to the situation they are in.
I understand your temptation to take this position and engage
Hello Devs,
Is it possible that you can make a patch for 2.6.18 vanilla? I have
tried to extract the patches from mm and apply to vanilla but this fails
to build. 2.6.18-MM oopses so that is also out.
Thanks
Sander
do emulation but if possible they will
pass instruction directly to the hardware without emulating vias a
hypervisor. Good reading on virtualization on 2.
Greets
Sander
[1] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virtualization
[2] http://www.kernelthread.com/publications/virtualization/
is the general Howto
list for as many as 2 distro's, Gentoo and Ubuntu!
Greets
Sander
it is better to get in contact with the 2 people from this link.
https://wiki.ubuntu.com/Reiser4
David is a former gentoo users and was the one who maintained the love-sources.
The only e-mail address I could find for him was [EMAIL PROTECTED]
(his jabber but it looks ok.
Greets
Sander
cummunity can help out the namesys devs?
Greets
Sander
On Tue, 2006-08-01 at 23:12 +0200, Maciej Sołtysiak wrote:
Hello Sander,
Hey
Tuesday, August 1, 2006, 8:10:34 PM, you wrote:
Yes, and in case of gentoo there are already people maintaining an
ebuild which pull in r4 on the wiki.
http://gentoo-wiki.com/HOWTO_Reiser4_With_Gentoo-Sources
to implement a
filesystems.
Greets
Sander
or ..
With kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
.
That sounds more like a broken disk than a Reiser4 error. Can you post
the error messages from dmesg?
With kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
myself..
Kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
the iram use pci slot for power purpose. then where is
this pci slot limit coming from?
The sata controller is on pci. Btw, pci is not a slot per se.
Kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
enough..
I use it on my desktop and a few servers, some since early 2005. Never
caused me serious trouble (save for the major performance regression
late 2005 - early 2006).
Reiserfs (v3) also never let me down.
Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
as they don't have a proven track record
yet (pun intended ;-).
Kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
Joe Feise wrote (ao):
Sander wrote on 01/29/06 23:25:
Andrew Morton wrote (ao):
ftp://ftp.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/akpm/patches/2.6/2.6.16-rc1/2.6.16-rc1-mm4/
+reiser4-big-update-bug-fix-for-readpage-fix.patch
+reiser4-warnings-cleanup.patch
+reiser4-do-not-use
.
We do have the logfile and the lost+found directory full or files.
Is there any chance to repair the damage done with these two, or at least
get some data back? How can this be done? Or should we leave it up to the
expert? Any help or suggestions would be appreciated.
Regards,
Sander
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao):
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 08:09, Sander wrote:
My 'good' system:
kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm2
OS: Debian Sid
disks: 4x sata on Promise
raid/lvm/etc: lmv stripe
My 'bad' system:
kernel: 2.6.15-rc1-mm1
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
Sander wrote:
Reiser-dev team, do you need other info beside what is listed there?
It could be useful if there were a description of a test which was used to
measure slowdown, result of that test on both good and bad kernels.
Information about good kernel
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao):
For Sander's list:
http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c
strace -T -e sync,fsync reiser4-fsync
I've added this one, but it segfaults at my system:
$ gcc -o reiser4-fsync reiser4-fsync.c
$ strace -T -e sync,fsync ./reiser4-fsync
Segmentation fault
Any
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao):
On Wednesday 23 November 2005 13:17, Sander wrote:
Hesse, Christian wrote (ao):
For Sander's list:
http://www.earthworm.de/tmp/reiser4-fsync.c
strace -T -e sync,fsync reiser4-fsync
I've added this one, but it segfaults at my system:
$ gcc -o
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
Please unapply the attached patch and check whether it makes any effect.
Is there any risk involved in testing this patch?
And is this a real patch which fixes a real problem, or is it a test?
cd fs/reiser4
cat patch | patch -p1 -R
diff --git
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
Sander wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
Please unapply the attached patch and check whether it makes any effect.
Is there any risk involved in testing this patch?
It should not. The only problem it will cause is not updating atime on
accessing
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
Sander wrote:
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
No. This is not a fix. This is a patch which I suspect is responsible for
sync
performance drop. It fixes old reiser4 bug known as not updating atime.
I asked you to reverse this patch to check whether
Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
Craig Shelley wrote:
With the noatime and nodiratime options, the problem of accessing files
causing a massive sync time has gone. See the results below.
Although this option has made the system useable, I don't think it has
fully solved the problem. I think fsync()
Marcel Hilzinger wrote (ao):
Did you ever think about, that this is not a reiser4 problem, but a
kernel bug or a problem related to hal?
Suse 10 has big problems with external USB drives using sync as mount
option. They used sync already in 9.3 but with 2.6.11 there were no
such problems.
Marcel Hilzinger wrote (ao):
Am Dienstag, 22. November 2005 11:38 schrieb Sander:
Marcel Hilzinger wrote (ao):
Did you ever think about, that this is not a reiser4 problem, but a
kernel bug or a problem related to hal?
Suse 10 has big problems with external USB drives using sync
E.Gryaznova wrote (ao):
Sander wrote:
# echo foo /boot/test
# time vim +s/foo/bar/ +wq /boot/test
real0m0.016s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.000s
# echo foo /root/test
# time vim +s/foo/bar/ +wq /root/test
real0m9.667s
user0m0.000s
sys 0m0.020s
/dev/hda2 on / type
E.Gryaznova wrote (ao):
Unfortunately we are not able to reproduce this slowdown. Would you
please provide more info?:
FWIW, I notice the same (I'm not the OP). My main workstation (Athlon)
runs 2.6.15-rc1-mm1. Vim needs 4 to 12 seconds to close any file, mutt
is very slow on sending email,
.
After that, mount the image and see what is left.
Hope this helps, kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
Fionn Behrens wrote (ao):
On Di, 2005-11-01 at 19:25 +0300, Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote:
Can you please check what fs/reiser4/reiser4.h:REISER4_USE_EFLUSH is
set to? If it is 0, please try your test having it set to 1.
It is set to 0. I changed it to 1. What is the supposed result of this
Gregory Maxwell wrote (ao):
On 10/25/05, Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
That will kill performance badly. First of all the two read/writes
needed, and second because you have to seek from one end to the disk
to the other every time you read/write something.
Kill it worse for writes than
Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
This would not be (at least in theory) useful for RAID devices, but for
a user with a single disk drive, it might be useful to have a plugin
that creates two (or N) copies, and tries to allocate the two copies at
opposite ends of the disk. Anyone out there still looking
Hans Reiser wrote (ao):
It is only for very important files for computers which have only one
hard drive. Some of the work is with changing fsck.
Well, if the files are important, then you should have backups anyway,
whatever raid or similar you have. I still don't see an advantage in
ch4os wrote (ao):
Anyway to undelete them? or recover them... I had just backuped them
up and was going to move them to a new backup location on an external
drive...
If you just made a backup, why don't you just retrieve the files from
the archive? After all, that is what you make
V?clav H?la wrote (ao):
Dne st?eda 12 ??jna 2005 13:17 Vladimir V. Saveliev napsal(a):
I believe it is fixed in 2.6.14-rc2-mm2. Please use it.
PS: if it still does not work - try to set REISER4_USE_EFLUSH macro (it is
in file fs/reiser4/reiser4.h) to 1.
If that does not help - please
Peter Nixon wrote (ao):
At 06:15 this morning the following errors showed up in /var/log/messages
Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: kernel BUG at prints.c:334!
Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: invalid operand: 2.4.21-138-smp #1
SMP Fri Oct 31 00:51:31 UTC 2003
Oct 11 06:15:03
Peter Nixon wrote (ao):
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 16:31, Sander wrote:
Peter Nixon wrote (ao):
At 06:15 this morning the following errors showed up in /var/log/messages
Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: kernel BUG at prints.c:334!
Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: invalid
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
Hello
Sander wrote:
Peter Nixon wrote (ao):
On Tuesday 11 October 2005 16:31, Sander wrote:
Peter Nixon wrote (ao):
At 06:15 this morning the following errors showed up in /var/log/messages
Oct 11 06:15:03 DB2MUHASEBE kernel: kernel BUG at prints.c:334
Yiannis Mavroukakis wrote (ao):
Thanks for the suggestions guys...however I should have clarified that
I no longer have the dead disk (long story...)
FWIW, I'm interested in the story if you don't mind :-)
so I am kind of stuck with what I have...Am I stuffed ?
You just lost one-third of
% full wrt performance because of the 5% reservation?
Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
Kris, please linewrap after 72 chars and refrain from posting
non-relevant signatures.
Kris Van Bruwaene wrote (ao):
I recently discovered that scripts have become non-executable on my reiserfs
share, even though the -x flags are set:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/home/kris# cat tst
#! /usr/bin/perl -w
Vladimir V. Saveliev wrote (ao):
You might want to look at
http://namesys.com/bad-block-handling.html
I believe it is in uptodate state. Yes, Vitaly?
===
Last modified: Sat Nov 1 19:24:19 2003 (maintained by Vitaly Fertman
[EMAIL PROTECTED]).
This document is available at
.
Sander
--
After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing,
after all, as wanting. It is not logical, but it is often true.
Spock, Amok Time
stardate 3372.7
it will be built with
-m32 (just checked) and if you built it with -m64 i get the same error
as you. Gentoo has a special static 32bit package if you do not run
multilib, my guess is that Debian does the same with those packages.
Sander
--
After a time, you may find that having is not so pleasing a thing
Ed Tomlinson wrote (ao):
Reiserfs is a mailing list. And yes some spam does get relayed by it
This mess itself, sent to the list, is SPAM. _Please_ check before
sending messages like this.
LoL!
You don't seem to be aware of the fact that the message below is sent by
a virus ;-)
On Thursday
of fsck.reiser4 :-)
Btw, I blame the corruption on the combination kernel and a forced
hard-reboot during shutdown (it hung).
Again, thumbs up. This all made me much more confident wrt Reiser4.
With kind regards, Sander
Micha Mutschler wrote (ao):
Is there any chance to see the data on a reiserfs partition (112GB)
that was formated with ext3?
The answer might be 'yes'. Read this thread:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11079014621r=1w=2n=20
And especially this message:
I have been using the tarball from ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/.
Have not had any problems with this but I do not know how up to date it is.
Sander
On Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:16:47 +0100, Mark Junker [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
where are the Reiser4 sources? I just want to use
Louis Erickson wrote (ao):
On Fri, 14 Jan 2005, Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
What arguments did you use?
reiserfsck --check /dev/md2
Good. Then the options Lena suggested will most likely make your data
appear.
What version of reiserfsck?
How do I find that out? It isn't
Louis Erickson wrote (ao):
I don't know how it happened, but the start of the /var partition of
one of the machines I run has gotten itself zeroed out. Only the first
little bit - 4k or so - is nulls, then a large amount of very
plausible data appears.
I can't get reiserfsck to even think
Danny Norging wrote (ao):
reiserfsck-3.6.19 just finished, still nothing new in lost+found :(
Thats what I did:
# losetup /dev/loop0 hdc1decrypted.dump
# reiserfsck --rebuild-tree -S /dev/loop0 -l reiserfsck-3.6.19.log
This is after you ran this command with the older reiserfsck right? In
Danny Norging wrote (ao):
since Vitaly seems not to take notice of my mail and I cant afford
another money-order (being just a student), I wonder if somebody else
out there has *any* hint on what to try next. Please have a look at
this
First of all I would like to tell you and others (on the
Hello all,
Tomorrow morning I'll reinstall (and reformat to reiser3) a dual Opteron
which has a troublesome reiser4 fs.
Should I run some tests, or retrieve some debug info from the reiser4 fs
before I reformat?
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
Hi,
For some reason mails to the mailinglist don't make it. Also not to the
archives, but I got no error back yet.
And www.namesys.com was unreachable this morning (GMT+1).
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao):
On Mon, 2005-01-03 at 20:37, Sander wrote:
Tomorrow morning I'll reinstall (and reformat
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao):
On Thu, 2004-12-30 at 21:32, Sander wrote:
Does this update make reiser4 ready for Opteron systems?
This update does not contain anything specific for Opteron.
Do you have any problmes with reiser4 on it?
I'm afraid so, yes. bonnie++ is oke, but an idle
Esben Stien wrote (ao):
I really don't like that there is no undelete feature in reiserfs -
it's not planned for reiserfs-4 either. I see desperate users all the
time trying to get back what they mistakenly removed.
If you 'see desperate users all the time' you might be amoung the wrong
people
Esben Stien wrote (ao):
Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Next time it is not their mistake, but instead a broken harddisk.
Undelete wont save them then.
We got pretty good tools to restore from a hd with bad blocks.
dd it, loop it, fsck it.
I'm sure a friend of mine disagrees
Vladimir Saveliev wrote (ao):
you can get latest reiser4 for 2.6.10
(ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10/reiser4-for-2.6.10-1.gz)
and update for 2.6.10-rc3-mm1
(ftp://ftp.namesys.com/pub/reiser4-for-2.6/2.6.10-rc3-mm1/reiser4-update-for-2.6.10-rc3-mm1-1.gz).
Thank you all! Was
Esben Stien wrote (ao):
Sander [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm sure a friend of mine disagrees with you after paying big bucks
to a Norway based disk recovery company after a disk crash and zero
backups. A Dutch recovery company couldn't recover the disk.
Probably IBAS;). What
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
On Mon, 27 Dec 2004 13:28:15 +0100, Sander said:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with more scalability
and administration is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT*
include lots of odd new features
Alex Zarochentsev wrote (ao):
Can somebody please point me to a patch to disable the file as a
directory feature?
it is disabled in the recent reiser4 code.
That means the latest -mm (not 2.6.10-rc3-mm1) will contain the patch
too?
mount options 'nopseudo' should work for older versions.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote (ao):
For many shops, it's quite likely that a ZFS with more scalability
and administration is The Right Choice, especially if it does *NOT*
include lots of odd new features and quirks that might break
production code (remember the joys in getting Apache running on
Jake Maciejewski wrote (ao):
Have there been any reports other than Isaac's of reiser4 working on
AMD64? It still doesn't work for me, and I'd like to know if I'm the
only one having problems.
It sort of works for me on a dual opteron on top of raid10 on top op
scsi. This is 64bit and kernel
partitions.
And if I can help in any way please let me know!
Thanks and regards,
Sander
On Wed, 22 Dec 2004 15:11:23 +0200, Markus Törnqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi guys!
Now that I moved along to AMD64 and still have my home directory
as Reiser4, I have a big incentive to get this baby stable
Dan Nilsson wrote (ao):
Sounds like bad memory nevertheless. Can you try memtest86 for at least
24 hours?
Yes,
I put the computer running memtest86 after getting your email and it
did in fact pass all tests (after ~24hrs i aborted the test).
I have fairly recently upgraded the
Milan Holz?pfel wrote (ao):
I would like know whether you can tell me some state of ReiserFS and
Reiser4 on AMD64. I'm asking the the former because the gentoo docs
say that ReiserFS on AMD64 is not really stable so far ([1]) and the
latter because I have no idea of Reiser4's state on AMD64.
Hi,
I notice www.namesys.com is down for quite some time now. At first it
was not pingable, but now just the webserver refuses to 'serve the web'.
Is this due to the migration to reiserfs4?
...done
Same problem here, same kernel and reiser4progs but this is not on lvm
but a 25G partition.
The way the 2 errors look the same is scary.
Sander
Nikita Danilov wrote (ao):
Sander writes:
Btw, can you please make a snapshot against the -mm tree? I think
that would help to get it included in that tree.
Well, making two snapshots is kind of double trouble, because both
has to be tested and bug reports for them have to be handled
and standard are so different, if people switch from
standard+snapshot to -mm, it might be hard to tell if a bug is because
of the different tree, of because of Reiserfs4.
But you are the chief of course :-)
With kind regards, Sander
--
Humilis IT Services and Solutions
http://www.humilis.net
/data/kav-04.09.01-000/ is
in german, but covers the US patent 6,269,456 for McAfee which
covers a push technique to deploy virus scanner updates...
That's why we all have to pull...
Greetings
--
Robert Sander
Computer Scientist Epigenomics AG
Bioinformatics
75 matches
Mail list logo
