Hello
Hans Reiser wrote:
> ;-)
>
> Thanks,
>
> Hans
>
> Islam Amer wrote:
>
>>On 9/28/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>>Check out the latest cfq in the latest kernel, it is much better than
>>>the others for most applications. Anticipatory used to be the best, but
>>>cfq-3
;-)
Thanks,
Hans
Islam Amer wrote:
>On 9/28/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Check out the latest cfq in the latest kernel, it is much better than
>>the others for most applications. Anticipatory used to be the best, but
>>cfq-3 is better now.
>>
>>
>>
>Yes I always had
Andrew Morton wrote:
>Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>At the this time we have no idea which patch is responsible, probably in
>>a day or two we'll have a patch to fix it.
>>
>>
>>
>
>OK. I assume this performance change is demonstrable in just
>2.6.14-rc2+reiser4? Beware that
Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> At the this time we have no idea which patch is responsible, probably in
> a day or two we'll have a patch to fix it.
>
OK. I assume this performance change is demonstrable in just
2.6.14-rc2+reiser4? Beware that there are other changes in the -mm line
At the this time we have no idea which patch is responsible, probably in
a day or two we'll have a patch to fix it.
Hans
On 8/11/05, PFC <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Well, but then you have to tell postgres that it can assume these things
> > about reiser4.
>
> you can already set the sync mode in the config file to a llot of
> different choices, like fdatasync, fsync, O_SYNC, etc, so a reiser4 option
> wou
Well, but then you have to tell postgres that it can assume these things
about reiser4.
you can already set the sync mode in the config file to a llot of
different choices, like fdatasync, fsync, O_SYNC, etc, so a reiser4 option
would be possibel I guess.
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>"Reiser4 would be great if..." is getting old. It is great, and it's
>>getting even better pretty fast.
>>
>>And, by the way, if the transaction interface gets done, it's not just
>>databases that will benefit, bu
David Masover wrote:
>>
>>
>> I am skeptical that it gets worse than V3, unless it is because we
>> haven't put in all the bitmap optimizations we did for V3. I wish I
>> knew how to measure it.
>
>
> Me too. It's fairly subjective on my part, so maybe not. After all,
> I've gone from lots-
On Tuesday 09 August 2005 09:32 pm, David Masover wrote:
> Pat Double wrote:
> > Actually I did make it public, hit the wrong command on my mail client ;)
> >
> > I did not try the -mm kernel (latest patches is for -mm5 IIRC), I use
> > software suspend 2 and it does not apply to the 2.6.12.x-mm se
Pat Double wrote:
Actually I did make it public, hit the wrong command on my mail client ;)
I did not try the -mm kernel (latest patches is for -mm5 IIRC), I use software
suspend 2 and it does not apply to the 2.6.12.x-mm series. Except for this
problem reiser4 has worked great for me. Since I
Actually I did make it public, hit the wrong command on my mail client ;)
I did not try the -mm kernel (latest patches is for -mm5 IIRC), I use software
suspend 2 and it does not apply to the 2.6.12.x-mm series. Except for this
problem reiser4 has worked great for me. Since I use a single partit
Pat Double wrote:
Forgive me for moving to private, but I've posted this on the list before
without comment.
Make it public again if you like.
The 2.6.12.x patches and 2.6.12.x applied from -mm have incorrect behavior
when modifying the root directory. If you add or remove files in the root,
Forgive me for moving to private, but I've posted this on the list before
without comment.
The 2.6.12.x patches and 2.6.12.x applied from -mm have incorrect behavior
when modifying the root directory. If you add or remove files in the root,
the filesystem check fails. You can try this on a ram
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
My ability to use it is severely hampered only being able to use it on
boxes running test-kernel of the day.. which are laden with other
issues unrelated to reiser4 that I don't have time to deal with.
How recent
michael chang wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
michael chang wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its alrea
On Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:52:49 EDT, michael chang said:
> Striped RAID only works if you have multiple disks and a decent bus.
> I'm stuck on the lowest-end Dell Dimension 3000, with one of the
> slowest hard drives in history. And I haven't gotten around to
> opening the case... yet.
Newbie. ;)
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> michael chang wrote:
> > On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>Hans Reiser wrote:
> >>
> >>>David Masover wrote:
> >>>
> Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
>
> >On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
>
So for most webserver cases, FS speed doesn't matter. For the few
cases where it does, locality is usually fairly good... so who cares
if the new FS is 2x faster, when it is still 200x slower than ram. Add
ram.
But Reiser4 helps stuffing more files into the cache.
It also helps when
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Absolutely. I'm not knocking your idea, just wanted to clarify that
> "Reiser4 would be great if..." is getting old. It is great, and it's
> getting even better pretty fast.
(sorry for reply bloat)
I just wanted to point out.. that wasn't my
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Reiser4 would be great if..." is getting old. It is great, and it's
> getting even better pretty fast.
>
> And, by the way, if the transaction interface gets done, it's not just
> databases that will benefit, but also small files. After all,
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If ever you are looking for a killer app for Reiser4 that people who
don't care about the visionary stuff will care about:
Define "visionary
michael chang wrote:
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my b
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> > On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > If ever you are looking for a killer app for Reiser4 that people who
> > don't care about the visionary stuff will care about:
>
> Define "visionary"?
>
> I ca
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If ever you are looking for a killer app for Reiser4 that people who
don't care about the visionary stuff will care about:
Define "visionary"?
I can name a few things that work best in Reiser4, and very well in v3,
si
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hans Reiser wrote:
> > David Masover wrote:
> >>Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
> >>>On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
> Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
> better than most when my battery
Hans Reiser wrote:
David Masover wrote:
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6 kernel
Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>>I should add that fsync performance has not been worked on yet, which is
>>surely why postgres performance is poor.
>>
>>
>
>Hans, I'm on the postgresql hackers list (although I don't really have
>a voice there,
On 8/8/05, Hans Reiser <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I should add that fsync performance has not been worked on yet, which is
> surely why postgres performance is poor.
Hans, I'm on the postgresql hackers list (although I don't really have
a voice there, so I can't really speak much for reiser4 the
I think we should just let the current possible big sponsor take care of
the repacker sponsoring, and I will focus on making that happen.
Hns
David Masover wrote:
> Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
>
>> On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
>>> better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
>>> it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
>>
On 2005-08-08 16:58, michael chang wrote:
> To get $90 000 USD for Reiser4
> = = = = =
>
> If Paypal account used on Fundable.org is owned by Namesys:
> Required before Fees: $ 96550.25
> Donators at $25 ea: 3863 (-- mostly because of that last evil quarter
> [...]
> You also
On 8/8/05, Bedros Hanounik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On 8/8/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > PFC wrote:
> > > > >>> If only it had a resizer :(
> > > > > I w
Hello David,
Monday, August 8, 2005, 9:56:36 PM, you wrote:
> What I want is the repacker, beacuse performance does steadily degrade
> on my Reiser4 systems, eventually getting worse than Reiser3, but not
> worse than VFAT -- probably because my old FAT partitions are on old,
> virus-ridden system
how many people are on reiserfs-list? On 8/8/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/8/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:> > PFC wrote:
> > >>> If only it had a resizer :(> > > I would definitely give $25 for the repacker,
On 8/8/05, michael chang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > PFC wrote:
> > >>> If only it had a resizer :(
> > > I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the
> > > mandatory condition to get the resizer. How many people would give
On 8/8/05, David Masover <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> PFC wrote:
> >>> If only it had a resizer :(
> > I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the
> > mandatory condition to get the resizer. How many people would give $25
> > too ? why not do a little fundraising ?
> I would gi
Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
If only it had a resizer :(
Resizer isn'
PFC wrote:
If only it had a resizer :(
I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the
mandatory condition to get the resizer. How many people would give $25
too ? why not do a little fundraising ?
I would give $25 before it is done, only if it will be F/OSS. I would
g
I should add that fsync performance has not been worked on yet, which is
surely why postgres performance is poor.
Hans
Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
>
>I just upgraded to the latest -mm kernel on my box and my jaw is on the
>fl
Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
>Hi,
>
>I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
>
>I just upgraded to the latest -mm kernel on my box and my jaw is on the
>floor looking at the performance of reiser4. I have previously played around
>with it on a few occasions, but I never had
If only it had a resizer :(
I would definitely give $25 for the repacker, which is the mandatory
condition to get the resizer. How many people would give $25 too ? why not
do a little fundraising ?
On 2005-08-08 14:09, Raymond A. Meijer wrote:
> > Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
> > better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
> > it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
Yes, yes, yes.
I had a DMA problem and the laptop froze several times on
On Monday 8 August 2005 13:32, Hemiplegic Menehune wrote:
> Its already as stable as any other fs on my systems and recovers
> better than most when my battery runs out. Any idea when it will make
> it into the stable 2.6 kernel?
If only it had a resizer :(
That's one of the main reasons I stopp
I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
Same here. The first filesystem ever which makes a crummy laptop drive
look goo, and that's saying something.
Hi,
I just wanted to say thank you for putting together reiser4 :)
I just upgraded to the latest -mm kernel on my box and my jaw is on the
floor looking at the performance of reiser4. I have previously played around
with it on a few occasions, but I never had the chance to test it with my
soft
46 matches
Mail list logo
