Lederman [lederman.ma...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, August 15, 2014 11:05 AM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
I blogged about it here:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/07/confirmation-that-supreme-courts.html
DOJ has now told
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] on behalf of Marty Lederman [
lederman.ma...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 11:05 AM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
I blogged about it here:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014
[
lederman.ma...@gmail.com]
*Sent:* Friday, August 15, 2014 11:05 AM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
I blogged about it here:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/07/confirmation-that-supreme-courts.html
DOJ has now told
Academics
Subject: Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
I blogged about it here:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/07/confirmation-that-supreme-courts.html
DOJ has now told the 10th Circuit that the new reg will be issued no later than
a week from today (Aug. 22).
On Fri, Aug 15
.*
*From:* religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] *On Behalf Of *Ira Lupu
*Sent:* Friday, August 22, 2014 3:59 PM
*To:* Law Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
Thanks, Tom. I
An updated version of my post (
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-augmented-contraception-coverage.html
):
*The Augmented Contraception Coverage Regulations (and an NPRM on extension
of the accommodation to some for-profit employers)*
Marty Lederman
As promised
434-243-8546
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 5:45 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
An updated
Religion issues for Law Academics
*Subject:* Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
An updated version of my post (
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/08/the-augmented-contraception-coverage.html
):
*The Augmented Contraception Coverage Regulations (and an NPRM on
extension
|
www.LRRLaw.comFrom:http://www.LRRLaw.comFrom:
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu]
On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 4:32 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
You've got
...@lists.ucla.edu
religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 4:32 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
You've got those basically correct, Doug:
In order to prevail
: Friday, August 22, 2014 4:32 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: Administration to ‘Augment’ ACA Contraceptive Rules
You've got those basically correct, Doug:
In order to prevail, an employer with a self-insured plan would have to
demonstrate a substantial burden on religious
I blogged about it here:
http://balkin.blogspot.com/2014/07/confirmation-that-supreme-courts.html
DOJ has now told the 10th Circuit that the new reg will be issued no later
than a week from today (Aug. 22).
On Fri, Aug 15, 2014 at 11:54 AM, Conkle, Daniel O. con...@indiana.edu
wrote:
This
12 matches
Mail list logo
