RE: science professor lecture

2014-09-30 Thread Eric Treene
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:02 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: science professor lecture Well, I assumed Marc's question started from the premise

Re: science professor lecture

2014-09-30 Thread Stephen Monsma
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu on behalf of Eric Treene etre...@comcast.net Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:36 AM To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics' Subject: RE: science professor lecture Marc also was asking about the flip side: what if a science professor dedicated a class every year

RE: science professor lecture

2014-09-30 Thread Graber, Mark
and subject to refutation by scientific means. From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu [mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Stephen Monsma Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:16 AM To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics' Subject: Re: science professor lecture I

Re: science professor lecture

2014-09-30 Thread Perry Dane
Hi all, I agree with others that this issue gets complicated by the professor's own academic freedom and the related question of whether the views expressed in his lecture should be ascribed to the state. Putting all that aside, though, the lecture is clearly dubious as a matter of

Re: science professor lecture

2014-09-30 Thread Ed Darrell
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:02 PM To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics Subject: Re: science professor lecture Well, I assumed Marc's question started from the premise that such a lecture would be very constitutionally

Re: science professor lecture

2014-09-30 Thread Alan Hurst
Academics *Subject:* Re: science professor lecture Well, I assumed Marc's question started from the premise that such a lecture would be very constitutionally dubious, at a minimum, if it occurred in primary or secondary school, and then was asking if and why the constitutional analysis would change

Re: science professor lecture

2014-09-28 Thread Steven Jamar
How would it not be constitutional? What possible theory? On Sep 28, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Marc Stern ste...@ajc.org wrote: Today's NY Times Review section has an article by a professor of evolutionary biology at a public university describing a lecture he gives annually explaining how that