From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:02 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: science professor lecture
Well, I assumed Marc's question started from the premise
-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
on behalf of Eric Treene etre...@comcast.net
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 7:36 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: RE: science professor lecture
Marc also was asking about the flip side: what if a science professor
dedicated a class every year
and subject to
refutation by scientific means.
From: religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Stephen Monsma
Sent: Tuesday, September 30, 2014 10:16 AM
To: 'Law Religion issues for Law Academics'
Subject: Re: science professor lecture
I
Hi all,
I agree with others that this issue gets complicated by
the professor's own academic freedom and the related question of whether
the views expressed in his lecture should be ascribed to the state.
Putting all that aside, though, the lecture is clearly dubious as a
matter of
[mailto:religionlaw-boun...@lists.ucla.edu] On Behalf Of Marty Lederman
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2014 10:02 PM
To: Law Religion issues for Law Academics
Subject: Re: science professor lecture
Well, I assumed Marc's question started from the premise that such a lecture
would be very constitutionally
Academics
*Subject:* Re: science professor lecture
Well, I assumed Marc's question started from the premise that such a
lecture would be very constitutionally dubious, at a minimum, if it
occurred in primary or secondary school, and then was asking if and why the
constitutional analysis would change
How would it not be constitutional? What possible theory?
On Sep 28, 2014, at 5:24 PM, Marc Stern ste...@ajc.org wrote:
Today's NY Times Review section has an article by a professor of evolutionary
biology at a public university describing a lecture he gives annually
explaining how that