Hi guys .I have the above diplexer and have it tunned to 481.825 and
487.025 and it works but if the repeater is tx for a while the weak
signal breaks down and crackles and after a while it comes back clear
and then breaks down.On my service monitor the notches show a reading
of -65db with 0
In this particular situation, the users don't need to hear each other. This
will be used for running a Skywarn net on two repeaters which are not
linked. Only the net control station needs to hear everyone. Users will be
trained to expect this format.
Getting back to the technical stuff,
I'm looking for info on what items i need to program M/A Com GE Mastr III
VHF repeaters. Software part number, cable part number and anything else i
may need.
Gary LaForce
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of John Sichert
What is the approx. going price for a RLC-4,
yellow face, latest firmware, ,rack mount, 16 LED's
Paul
K.Paul Boggs
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mountain Emergency Communications
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
To unsubscribe from
About $615.00 to your door step here in Oregon.
Mike
Oregon Repeater Linking Group
Mike Mullarkey
6539 E Street
Springfield, OR 97478
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
www.orlg.org
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sorry-My Error-
Price (average) for a good used one
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Mike Mullarkey
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 1/27/2006 7:18:33 AM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] RLC -4 Going Price
About $615.00 to your door step here in Oregon.
Mike
Oregon
You can parallel two Motorola MaxTrac radios, so I'd
think you can also do it with two other same-model
radios as well. You might not have enough mike level
for each radio, but that could be overcome by
close-talking the mike.
Of course you will need two antennas, or some kind of
tuned diplexer
The cable is a straight DB9 to DB9 - nothing special. It runs from the
comport to the data port on the radio.
I will have to look for the PN on the application - it will go into the 2M
or 440 ham bands just fine except on the 440 band you may have to change
some components on the TX VCO - been
As described by Link Comm some years back, their original
RLC-6 Board (which I have a number of...) has two linking
options. One is described as repeater hub linking, the other
as repeater chain linking.
In the Chain Link Mode, the board will route any active
receiver (half or duplex mode)
It wouldn't be that hard to make a chain mode linking
system. If you're using maxtracs, I've already designed
and built the (maxtrac) interface for a commercial
application. Works great, lasts a long time...
With the proper respect for dc isolation and ac loading,
you can parallel the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, it was worth a try.
The RF Deck came out of a TKR 620 desk-top repeater. Unfortunately, the
front panel and other items were lost when the owner scrapped it out for
the power supply present in the Desk-Top repeater that the TK-722R came
out of; as well as
skipp025 wrote:
After many years of Mountain Top Work, we caught our
first full-on view of a Large (full size) Mountain Lion
last week. She crossed the road right in front of us
with two giant leaps up the birm into the woods.
Very impressive... after seeing about everything else,
HI...
It has been a while since I was on 450 mhz.. but I believe the spacing
between receiver and transmitter, on 450, is some where around 1.2 mhz
not 600 khz
Larry ve3fxq
- Original Message -
From: Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January
Dave VanHorn wrote:
Just arrived, crystals from west for our UHF pair.
We plan to put the system online this weekend.
441.9 + 127.3 PL Muncie IN.
:)
Interesting that IN is assigning below 442. I was thinking about asking
around why Ohio doesn't assign repeaters or links between 440 and
Russ Wilson wrote:
pretty neat pictures...
Mule on the attack.
ugh-poor cat...
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[EMAIL
At 12:09 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Interesting that IN is assigning below 442. I was thinking about asking
around why Ohio doesn't assign repeaters or links between 440 and 442...
---Interestingly, Dave was assigned the same channel as one of my
repeaters here in Oregon. Which, of course
I would think that the front panel board from any radio in the TKR-x20 or TKB-x20 series can be swaped in there. You should be able to swap between a TKR-820 and a TKR-720 just fine.
Then just change out the 8 pin EEProm from one into the other for your
channels, there also is some code here
Ken Arck wrote:
At 11:46 AM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
HI...
It has been a while since I was on 450 mhz.. but I believe the spacing
between receiver and transmitter, on 450, is some where around 1.2 mhz
not 600 khz
---The standard is 5 Mhz, at least in the US :-)
Ken
Except
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 12:09 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
Interesting that IN is assigning below 442. I was thinking about
asking
around why Ohio doesn't assign repeaters or links between 440 and
442...
---Interestingly, Dave was
At 11:46 AM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
HI...
It has been a while since I was on 450 mhz.. but I believe the
spacing
between receiver and transmitter, on 450, is some where around 1.2
mhz
not 600 khz
1.2 mhz is 220 band, isn't it?
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your
DCFluX wrote:
I would think that the front panel board from any radio in the TKR-x20 or
TKB-x20 series can be swaped in there. You should be able to swap between a
TKR-820 and a TKR-720 just fine.
Yes-I would expect that too: TKR to TKR and TKB to TKB. Staying in the
'20 series, btw. I
At 11:46 AM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
HI...
It has been a while since I was on 450 mhz.. but I believe the spacing
between receiver and transmitter, on 450, is some where around 1.2 mhz
not 600 khz
---The standard is 5 Mhz, at least in the US :-)
Ken
Dave VanHorn wrote:
At 11:46 AM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
HI...
It has been a while since I was on 450 mhz.. but I believe the
spacing
between receiver and transmitter, on 450, is some where around 1.2
mhz
not 600 khz
1.2 mhz is 220 band, isn't it?
220 is 1.6 Mhz
Standard spacing for UHF repeaters is 5 MHz.
Dick
- Original Message -
From: larry [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 27 January, 2006 08:46
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RFS 6MC450S DIPLEXER
HI...
It has been a while since I was on 450 mhz.. but I believe
At 12:23 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
---The standard is 5 Mhz, at least in the US :-)
Except 470-512 where the standard is 3Mhz.
---Ok ok, so I should have qualified that as MID-SPLIT g
Ken
--
President and CTO -
The question came up about reed compatibility. I have never had a
problem using the KLN6209 interchangably with the TLN6709 in lots of
different radios, from HT220's to Mitrek's and Maxar-80's.
Is there really a difference?
I know they can't be used in a Micor *decoder*, but they both have
Too often folks take pictures from unknown sources and credit them with
unbelievable things.
Read the truth about the so called lion killing mule:
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/m/mule-lion.htm
A little research usually clears up these questions.
73, Tony W4ZT
vmckever wrote:
Some
I have looked through the archives for as long as I can press Search
More before I go insane
I have been tasked with recrystalizing a WR series 90 UHF repeater.
For those that dont know WR, they are the father of Glenayre
equipment.
I am looking for a manual to tune these modules, but I
I am using 2 GE phoenix SX UHF to tie 146.66 in Waco to 146.82 in Temple -
works FB. I am sure the radius will work well for this task. You may need
to protect the link radio from the 440 repeater transmitter and vice versa
with some cavity filters. On 2M with a 440 control link and DB222
IL Is doing 440-442 now as well. The problem IL has, and IN I imagine, is that Michigan will not recoginize any new coordinations in the 440-442 band, and instaead of providing useful data to IL when a request is submitted for new coord., like MI had a link on that freq, they just say NO (or
Ken Arck wrote:
At 12:23 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
---The standard is 5 Mhz, at least in the US :-)
Except 470-512 where the standard is 3Mhz.
---Ok ok, so I should have qualified that as MID-SPLIT g
Ken
I hope you have good luck but mose likley not. I recomend to just bite the bullet call Allan get one coming.
Mike
-- Original message -- From: "K.Paul Boggs" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sorry-My Error-
Price (average) for a good used one
Paul
- Original Message
The coordinator in MI shouldn't object to a coordination from an adjacent
council just because their bandplans aren't identical. For better or worse,
there isn't a universal bandplan that satisfies the entire amateur community
nation-wide.
If there is nothing coordinated in MI that is going to
TGundo 2003 wrote:
IL Is doing 440-442 now as well. The problem IL has, and IN I
imagine, is that Michigan will not recoginize any new coordinations
in the 440-442 band, and instaead of providing useful data to IL when
a request is submitted for new coord., like MI had a link on that
freq,
Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't MI the state with the 20 kHz 146-148
MHz bandplan that is different from EVERYONE surrounding them? Are you
objecting to all their 2M proposals that doesn't fall on a pair that is
within your bandplan?
I echo Jeff's comments - if there is no interference
Perhaps we should note that Ian is talking about a radio service in
Australia. I doubt that discussions about standard repeater splits in the US
are particularly useful to him.
Al, K9SI
- Original Message -
From: Ian [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Does anyone have specs, cable lengths, and tuning
procedures for a Wacom 850-950 MHz 4-can Bp/Br
duplexer? I have page 2 of a PDF document that only
has specs and performance curves. Telewave
cross-references it to their TTPD-8644, but that
doesn't seem to be available in as many offset/band
I can't help but wonder what a mountain lion tastes
like.
Bad idea.
Just leave it alone...ignore it.
I think they're still federally protected.
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To
This is from the March 2005 MIARC newsletter (I have *** the names to protect the innocent) available for public viewing on their website: "* introduced discussion asking for a resolution on how to respond to surrounding states who are using frequencies that we coordinate as links
In other words, they think they have the right to force THEIR bandplan on
all of the adjacent coordinators??!??!
I'd give my opinions, but they would be so profound and disgusting that
decorum prohibits listing them here (citing Animal House of course ;-).
Sounds like something the TXVHFFM Society would do... They don't even
want to share data with the other coordinating body in TX.
TGundo 2003 wrote:
This is from the March 2005 MIARC newsletter (I have *** the names to
protect the innocent) available for public viewing on their website:
I seem to recall a band select jumper on the display boardin the 722R manual.
J2 selects UHFor VHF J3 selects repeater or base
Chris
N9LLO
YAHOO! GROUPS LINKS
Visit your group "Repeater-Builder" on the web.
To unsubscribe from this group, send an email
220 band is 1.6geesh!
Dave VanHorn wrote:
At 11:46 AM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
HI...
It has been a while since I was on 450 mhz.. but I believe the
spacing
between receiver and transmitter, on 450, is some where around 1.2
mhz
not 600 khz
I thank you all for your comments and one in particular .Australia has
a 5.2 mhz split for commercial services .The problem i am coming up
against is the mobile diplexers seem to fade in and out of tune .On a
few sites i use these mobile diplexers with one cavity in the rx line
to clean up the
On Fri, 27 Jan 2006 17:44:18 -, ve7ltd wrote:
I am looking for a manual to tune these modules,
We have a set up using the WR 90 series stuff here
in Kitchener Dave, but it's a UHF receiver tied to
a VHF exciter/amp used for the NASA link. I have the
complete set of manuals some where and
Take a look at the below website. This story is not true.
Mike
AI4NS
http://www.truthorfiction.com/rumors/m/mule-lion.htm
- Original Message -
From: Russ Wilson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2006 8:10 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder]
That doesn't surprise me with the dealings I've had with MI as well.
And not just in ham radio...
--
Jim Barbour
WD8CHL
clearing throat
I assume that those dealings weren't with me...
As for the MIARC, no comment. (Let's just say that my rating is not a
10).
Laryn K8TVZ
S'Okay - we can take the slams ..
What the IL guys DON'T have to contend with is the LINE-A baloney that's
dished out to us .. Nothing EVER fits, on ANY band, in ANY service...
Would you like some cheeze crackers with that whine .. ?? g
~ RSG / N8BQN ~
40mi E of Line-A
(Note: all the re- re-
Hello,
I just finished the first conversion to a repeater using the ICS controllers
I recently purchased. The repeater is now on 442.150 TX and the receiver is
447.150 with CTCSS of 110.9 Hz.
Interesting little board, it works well and is VERY cost effective. While
this board is obviously
So I guess they are accepting objections for the same reason? (reference
my last post about their bandplan that differs from everyone else's
around them)
Joe M.
Yahoo! Groups Links
* To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/Repeater-Builder/
* To
Yes, thanks for the memory jogg. As I, know, recall,
I believe its 1.2 mhz for 220
Larry ve3fxq
- Original Message -
From: Ken Arck [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 12:15 PM
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] RFS 6MC450S
The standard repeater offset is 1.6 MHz for 222-225 MHz and 5.0 MHz
for 420-450 MHz.
Paul Yonge KC2PBD
On Jan 27, 2006, at 12:46 PM, larry wrote:
Yes, thanks for the memory jogg. As I, know, recall,
I believe its 1.2 mhz for 220
Larry ve3fxq
- Original Message -
From:
Imay have stubbled across the problem .the connectors on the test cable
between the diplexer and the service monitor were hand tight so i tried
tightning them and it seems to have cleared the desense.I will have to
check more on this on my other repeater sites as the heliax fittings
are only
On Jan 27, 2006, at 7:31 PM, Paul Yonge wrote:
The standard repeater offset is 1.6 MHz for 222-225 MHz and 5.0 MHz
for 420-450 MHz.
Paul Yonge KC2PBD
I just found out that I got my vanity call sign. Congratulations to me!
Paul Yonge, CBT
W2ARK WQDY219
MIDLAKES REPEATER
Have ARK
At 07:42 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
I just found out that I got my vanity call sign. Congratulations to me!
W2ARK WQDY219
---I tried to get AH6ARCK but.. g
Ken
--
President and CTO - Arcom
And to see where you're going, Paul, will you install an ARK LIGHT?
(The devil made me do it!!!)
Congrats 73,
Dick W1NMZ
- Original Message -
From: Paul Yonge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 27 January, 2006 16:42
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater
Ken -
It was a toss-up between W2ARK and N2ARK but I thought some might
think I was into drug enforcement and would toss my van looking for
the evidence locker.
I plan to set up itinerant repeaters in the van on 2-meters and on
GMRS using a Kenwood TKR 750 and a TKR 850. They'll be
Dick -
That's a good idea. I was thinking about a couple of six-packs of
ARK Light in the cooler, though.
Paul W2ARK
On Jan 27, 2006, at 8:34 PM, Dick wrote:
And to see where you're going, Paul, will you install an ARK LIGHT?
(The devil made me do it!!!)
Congrats 73,
Dick W1NMZ
At 08:41 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
I plan to set up itinerant repeaters in the van on 2-meters and on
GMRS using a Kenwood TKR 750 and a TKR 850. They'll be simplex
repeaters because of coordination problems on 2-meters and the
absence of 467 MHz GMRS frequencies on the bubble-pack
Works for me!! G
Dick
- Original Message -
From: Paul Yonge [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: 27 January, 2006 17:45
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Repeater Offsets and Vanity
Dick -
That's a good idea. I was thinking about a couple of six-packs of
ARK
Ken, I think you have the perfect callsign. (If you'd only have been a
0 grinning and ducking! Mike
Ken Arck wrote:
At 07:42 PM 1/27/2006 -0500, you wrote:
I just found out that I got my vanity call sign. Congratulations to me!
W2ARK WQDY219
---I tried to get AH6ARCK
Ken -
Good question! I guess my thinking was that, if I were using the
repeaters in connection with critical incident response, having the
flexibility of switching onto any of the 16 channels pre-programmed
with different CTCSS tones would give me more flexibility in
different areas of
Ken -
In his document Simplex Repeater Guidelines at http://
members.cox.net/n1nte/simplex_repeater_guidelines.html, Rob N1NTE
suggests an interesting emergency application that could easily be
set up on the TKR 750:
If most of the local duplex repeaters have been knocked off the air,
it
Icom had such a unit that would plug into your handi .. I have one ..
its a parrot repeater .. you talk in , it stores your voice, the out is
comes
also can be used to run a cheap repeater with 2 handies .. or
mobiles if needed ..
great little box to bad thay are hard to find now a days
I just picked up a little problem, my PL boards are dropping out
sometimes when I have a valid PL.
Can anyone tell me offhand what the PL signal voltage should be at the
input to the boards? (TS-32 in this case) I have about 0.8Vpp, which I
would have thought was enough.
Yahoo!
I can't get to it either.
Richard, N7TGB
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Web Site Down?
Is the RB web site
On the repeater-builder web site I found a link to LBI's and noted that
one was needed for ET60/59. I scanned one this evening, and wanted to e-
mail it, but the web site is unavailable and need to know who to e-mail
the file to. It is comprised of three pdf's and a bit over 3MB total.
These
Richard wrote:
I can't get to it either.
Richard, N7TGB
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jack Davis
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 8:33 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Web Site Down?
Is the
Thanks,
I thought I had a problem!
Jack
K6YC
- Original Message -
From: Richard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2006 9:11 PM
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Web Site Down?
I can't get to it either.
Richard, N7TGB
-Original
At 1/27/2006 11:34, you wrote:
In other words, they think they have the right to force THEIR bandplan on
all of the adjacent coordinators??!??!
I'd give my opinions, but they would be so profound and disgusting that
decorum prohibits listing them here (citing Animal House of course ;-).
70 matches
Mail list logo
