This has to be a joke right?
Look at item number, 130377678510
$1,320 are they for real? I really love the missing covers, the bent case and
the rust. Adds real class.
James,
It would be helpful to know if you are planning using cavities and or filtering
to help provide the needed isolation.
Also knowing what the receiver will be and what the preamp is if any will all
play into what is needed to get any real world numbers to determine the
required isolation.
I have a new old stock thing I bought from Big M when I had a customer that had
these radios. They went with a rental company instead, so it did not get used
by me ever.
It is an REN 4000A,also I have in that box> 2 of< an NTN 5368a rf adaptor, this
thing allows one to open up and unfold the fle
I think one was called the Lineman? and another the Toner? I added some dtmf
and burst tones to my Sinadder 3 with aftermarket stuff from CES and others.
--- In Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com, "Gary Schafer" wrote:
>
> Ok, I never saw that one. That was after my time with them.
>
> There was
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, James Adkins wrote:
> We are considering installing a 2-meter repeater, standard 600 kHz
> spacing, with separate antennas for transmit and receive, looking at
> phasing together 2 DB-228's for RX and 2 DB-228's for TX and using a
> high-power transmitter, such as a Motorola
We are considering installing a 2-meter repeater, standard 600 kHz spacing,
with separate antennas for transmit and receive, looking at phasing together
2 DB-228's for RX and 2 DB-228's for TX and using a high-power transmitter,
such as a Motorola Nucleus at 250-300w or other high-power transmitter
At 07:00 PM 26/03/2010, you wrote:
>I have finally tracked down a copy of the original RG-21A/U specification,
>and have posted it in the Files section of this Group, in the Coaxial Cable
>folder. RG-21A/U became official on 07 September 1955, as MIL-C-17/14.
>Then, RG-21A/U was replaced by RG-222
I have finally tracked down a copy of the original RG-21A/U specification,
and have posted it in the Files section of this Group, in the Coaxial Cable
folder. RG-21A/U became official on 07 September 1955, as MIL-C-17/14.
Then, RG-21A/U was replaced by RG-222/U, AKA MIL-C-17/83, on 28 February
195
Ok, I never saw that one. That was after my time with them.
There was another small company in Indiana that was started by a couple of
ex wavetek guys that build a line test box too. It would fully simulate DC
and tone remotes, measure line levels etc. Was a pretty nice box but pricey.
I can't rem
No Gary. I meant Sineman. I'm fully aware of the lineman. That was a bit
overpriced for what it did. We had two Nortel units that we bought ex-telco
that did the same thing elegantly.
The Sineman was a unit that we received a mailed brochure. I'm looking at it
now. The description: " Microproce
On Fri, 26 Mar 2010, Mike Morris WA6ILQ wrote:
> As far as I know the early Maxtrac did not implement "Channel
> Steering" (Motos' name for binary channel selection). You needed to
> use a late Maxtrac (more precisely one with the late logic board), a
> Radius LRA series or a GM300 to get that
The idea of the dual meter unit was to be able to quickly go thru a circuit
without having to touch the meter to change ranges or change to AC or DC. If
you stuck it on a DC circuit it would read that right. If you stuck it on an
AC circuit it would read that.
Also you could read an AC voltage rid
> Gary: The guy that marketed that 40 db power pad was actually a rep,
> a real character. I still have the data sheet and picture somewhere
> here in my library. He used to tell me his real money came from
> making and selling waders.
>
> BTW I do have the schematic and JPEG of the Cushman 4
Have the original in use on a 2 meter repeater - it works fine - I love the
serial programming for the ID and parameters. Can't do it remote, but I have
not had a need to. I will be getting one of the new models sometime to play
with. One comment - he does have protection on the two main input
As far as I know the early Maxtrac did not implement
"Channel Steering" (Motos' name for binary
channel selection). You needed to use a late Maxtrac
(more precisely one with the late logic board), a Radius
LRA series or a GM300 to get that feature, and
then you had to do some very careful programm
On Thu Mar 25, 2010 11:04 pm (PDT) "kd8biw" kd8...@hotmail.com wrote:
>Wondering if anyone has been able to implement a Motorola Maxtrac as a
>"frequency agile" remote base on a repeater. What I would like to do is have
>a 16 channel VHF mobile hooked to our repeater, and be able to select a
On Mar 26, 2010, at 12:04 AM, kd8biw wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> Wondering if anyone has been able to implement a Motorola Maxtrac as a
> "frequency agile" remote base on a repeater. What I would like to do is have
> a 16 channel VHF mobile hooked to our repeater, and be able to select a
> c
17 matches
Mail list logo
