Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-04-01 Thread russ
Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 5:38 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR Russ, you need to get hold of a spell checker. :-) (or not have it automatically 'fix' all the things it thinks is wrong.) Joe M. russ wrote: The problem

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-31 Thread russ
AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] Mastr II and Micor not ok to use in part 90?!?!?!?!? Says who? russ [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Gee I was work at ATC when the memo came down to remove all Master 2 RCA and Micores

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-31 Thread Neil McKie
- Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 5:03 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR I'll have to check that about part 90!! Regarding the Maggiore

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-31 Thread russ
Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA russ wrote: I do not think so on the cars. I think you need to think about

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-31 Thread Jim B.
@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 7:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might change from Motorola to Kenwood is price ... and perhaps attitude. Neil - WA6KLA Actually, Kenwood commercial

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-31 Thread russ
it is not cheap. You get what you pay for. smile Very best of 73, Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Wednesday, March 31, 2004 10:11 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]

2004-03-31 Thread mch
installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]] Mastr II and Micor not ok to use

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-31 Thread mch
best. Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: Neil McKie [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 8:08 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR In my opinion, the reason someone might

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]

2004-03-30 Thread Neal Newman
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good equipment. Russ and a well know fool o

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-30 Thread JOHN MACKEY
- Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-30 Thread Neal Newman
IL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]]

2004-03-30 Thread JOHN MACKEY
, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I have ever seen say that Maggoire is good equipment. Russ and a well know fool on this group. Jim B. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-30 Thread albemarle7
To Neal NewmanI think [EMAIL PROTECTED] is referring to me as the fool. Obviously he has no idea who I am nor my past contributions to scientific and television research. Having noted past demeaning comments to some from this individual, I wish he would keep his negative comments to

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]

2004-03-30 Thread russ
and forth. Again came out and see a good system well installed. 73 Russ, W3CH - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 10:29 AM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]

2004-03-30 Thread JOHN MACKEY
Message - From: Fred [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 8:06 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder

Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]]]]

2004-03-30 Thread JOHN MACKEY
with COR]] - Original Message - From: JOHN MACKEY [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Monday, March 29, 2004 7:54 PM Subject: Re: [Re: [Re: [Repeater-Builder] WTB: 440 Mhz Receiver with COR]] There are only 2 people who I