Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in IL to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications

2010-02-21 Thread MCH
Sorry - replied to the wrong message. Joe M. MCH wrote: > I should have realized that since I think there are base frequencies > below the UHF coverage that work. > > Regardless, it's a problem with the calculation and won't work. > > Thanks for the correction. > > Joe M. > > Greg Beat wrote

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in IL to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications

2010-02-21 Thread MCH
I should have realized that since I think there are base frequencies below the UHF coverage that work. Regardless, it's a problem with the calculation and won't work. Thanks for the correction. Joe M. Greg Beat wrote: > > > It would be a very interesting court case in this state (Illinois).

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in IL to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications

2010-02-21 Thread Kris Kirby
On Sun, 21 Feb 2010, Greg Beat wrote: > While the First Amendment upholds Freedom of Speech -- it does not > uphold a person that yells "Fire" in a crowded theatre -- causing a > panic and injury -- when there was no fire! w9gb Lenny Bruce made a comment about this, something to the effect o

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in IL to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications

2010-02-21 Thread Greg Beat
It would be a very interesting court case in this state (Illinois). Illinois is where "Air rights" were established 100 years ago -- above railroad right-of-way (that railroad could and did sell). It was the communication attorneys (and FCC) that used that landmark ruling -- to permit and enfor

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in Il to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications

2010-02-20 Thread Dan Hancock
What seems to be getting overlooked by everyone including the Illinois legislature is that they have NO authority to pass any law governing how the airwaves are used. The communications act gives SOLE jurisdiction over the airwaves to the FCC, period. If they pass this law and then try to pros

OT RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in Il to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications

2010-02-19 Thread Robert Pease
@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Walter H Sent: Friday, February 19, 2010 4:32 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in Il to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications What /I/ can add, is that the FCC has said that

[Repeater-Builder] Re: Unlawful in Il to Rebroadcast Public Safety Communications

2010-02-19 Thread Walter H
What /I/ can add, is that the FCC has said that if you want privacy for your communications, then encrypt them. Clear voice is available to anyone with the appropriate receiver. No, I can't find my source for this, I've read all the Daily Digests for the last 5+ years, and I believe it was in a