[Repeater-Builder] Re: Duplexer story update

2004-10-02 Thread Coy Hilton
Well Tim, that is going to be real close to 3/4 wave length at your freq. assuming a .66 prop facter like RG214. Still It would never hurt to have a matching device between the Tx and the duplexer. Normally it would be in the form of a pi network for the band in question. They are easy to

[Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Tim S.
As I stated a few times here I have a duplexer that has been giving me desense. To get rid of the desense I turned down the TX power until it went away because the duplexer is rusty and hasn't been messed with in 20+ years. I came across another duplexer in a base station cabinet we had and

Re: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread kd6hcn
Tim, a couple of questions come to mind. 1.) Are you trying to tune a T-band Duplexer down to 440? Not reccomended. 2.) Are you running a circulator between the duplexer and the antenna? 3.) Are you using the same cables out of the repeater to connect to the duplexer (either one) and seeing a

Re: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Paul Kelley
On Thursday 30 September 2004 02:16 am, Tim S. wrote: However, I put the service monitor on the PA output and read 42 watts. Hooked the cabling up to the duplexer and then checked the output of the duplexer and only read 22 watts. That's like a -2.8db loss. What is the SWR looking into the

Re: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Mark Holman
it would be to replace that connector, I am guessing it was riveted in during production. MH - Original Message - From: Tim S. [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 2:16 AM Subject: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story... As I stated

Re: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Ken Arck
At 12:09 AM 9/30/2004 -0700, you wrote: Tim, a couple of questions come to mind. 2.) Are you running a circulator between the duplexer and the antenna? --??? Ken -- President and CTO - Arcom

RE: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Tim S.
Comments within... -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Tim, a couple of questions come to mind. 1.) Are you trying to tune a T-band Duplexer down to 440? Not reccomended. No I am not trying to make it go to ham band. I maintain a private tband

RE: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Tim S.
-Original Message- From: Paul Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the SWR looking into the duplexer? Did not check that. What should it be? I assume 10% or less reflected. Have you tried different length cables from the transmitter to the duplexer and looked to see if the power

Re: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread mch
Tim S. wrote: -Original Message- From: Paul Kelley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] What is the SWR looking into the duplexer? Did not check that. What should it be? I assume 10% or less reflected. 4% is 1.5:1 (100W out - 4W back OR 50W out - 2W back) It should be no more at the TX

RE: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Tim S.
Thanks Joe. I'll check that out. -Tim -Original Message- From: mch [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, September 30, 2004 10:44 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story... Tim S. wrote: -Original Message- From: Paul

Re: [Repeater-Builder] The duplexer story...

2004-09-30 Thread Paul Kelley
What is the SWR looking into the duplexer? Did not check that. What should it be? I assume 10% or less reflected. Ideally it should be not much higher than the antenna SWR, but even if SWR into the duplexer is low, duplexers can look reactive and cause some PAs to act up. And even a