RE: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

ssage- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Sent: Sunday, May 25, 2008 3:11 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link When I say "through one of the groups" I refer to arrl VEC groups.

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

talk to him again, but I remember him saying he had a problem only > because > he'd never registered in ULS. > > Mike > WM4B > > -Original Message- > From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne > Sent: Wednesday, May

RE: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

e had a problem only because he'd never registered in ULS. Mike WM4B -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wayne Sent: Wednesday, May 21, 2008 5:53 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

I had tried a Google search, but as one person pointed out, too many web sites not updated. Now I see it is best to simply go directly to the FCC web site and look. regarding club calls/licenses, you cannot even put in a change of address without routing it through one of the groups, as

Re: ham websites (was: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link)

That explains it pretty well. Any time there is something like that, I would normally put a link to it on one of my web sites. I am aware that part 97 does change, as well as other parts of the rules. Of course, some people are so far behind that the code being dropped has not come to t

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

;Nate Duehr" < [EMAIL PROTECTED] com <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: < Repeater-Builder@ yahoogroups. com <mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com> > Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] part 97.201 was Control Link George Henry wrot

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

- Original Message - From: "Nate Duehr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 4:54 PM Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link > George Henry wrote: > >> Did you try the FCC website? 3 clicks from the home page and you&#x

RE: [Repeater-Builder]Part 97.201 was Control Link

are also available for download on the RBTIP. 73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of n9wys Sent: Monday, May 19, 2008 6:15 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder]Part 97.201 was

RE: [Repeater-Builder]Part 97.201 was Control Link

Or try here for the "official" copy: Mark - N9WYS -Original Message- From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com On Behalf Of Nate Duehr George Henry wrote: > Did you try the FCC website? 3 clicks from the

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

ahoogroups.com> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] part 97.201 was Control Link Why is it that it seems to be hard to locate the updated part 97.201 other than on the ARRL web site? I searched and searched but only came up with the older version till I searched on the ARRL site. Did you try the

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

George Henry wrote: > Did you try the FCC website? 3 clicks from the home page and you're there. > And in PDF form, too, which makes searching the rules for keywords SOO > much nicer! (I downloaded all of the subparts & assembled them into 1 PDF > document with Acrobat 6.0) This link:

ham websites (was: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link)

Wayne wrote: > Why is it that it seems to be hard to locate the updated part 97.201 > other than on the ARRL web site? > I searched and searched but only came up with the older version till I > searched on the ARRL site. Because most hams who have websites are clueless that Part 97 ever c

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

-Original Message- >From: Wayne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: May 19, 2008 2:57 PM >To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link > > Why is it that it seems to be hard to locate the updated part 97.201 >othe

Re: [Repeater-Builder]part 97.201 was Control Link

Why is it that it seems to be hard to locate the updated part 97.201 other than on the ARRL web site? I searched and searched but only came up with the older version till I searched on the ARRL site. At any rate, it does now allow one to use parts of two meter as control links. Argui