On Mar 7, 2010, at 4:46 PM, Larry Horlick wrote:
> So in a "duplex" application, if the supply of the better cable is limited,
> it's better to use it on the rx side?
I think other folks have said this as well, but the answer is... if the supply
of the right kind of cable to do the job is limi
> [mailto:Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com]
> On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
> Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:25 PM
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
>
> What is the difference between real and un-real RG214? And what is the
> problem
this Group.
73, Eric Lemmon WB6FLY
-Original Message-
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
[mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Eric Lemmon
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:05 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
Nope
> What is the difference between real and un-real RG214?
There are some non-mil-spec RG214 varients out there. Sometimes they are
labeled as "RG214 TYPE", or "RG214 Commercial". These typically have double
braid like "real" RG214, but unlike "real" RG214, the braids are bare copper
instead of
I believe that the real problem is that the center conductor is solid. A
slight nick in it will eventually cause it to break due to cable flexing
fatigue at the weak point. RG-400 is often used instead and has a stranded
center conductor.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
Spec RG-1
m] On Behalf Of Larry Horlick
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 2:55 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
Any problems with RG-214 or RG223 for duplexers/multi-couplers/combiners?
lh
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Dan Saputo mailto:dan17...@yaho
wrote:
From: Larry Horlick
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010, 6:46 PM
So in a "duplex" application, if the supply of the better cable is limited,
it's better to use it on the rx side?
On Sun, M
he thin plating to fracture off creating duplex noise. i've
> personally not had this problem but it is a documented issue.
>
> Dan
> k8plw
>
> --- On *Sun, 3/7/10, Larry Horlick * wrote:
>
>
> From: Larry Horlick
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
&g
42 has a silver-plated steel center conductor. repeated flexing can
cause the thin plating to fracture off creating duplex noise. i've personally
not had this problem but it is a documented issue.
Dan
k8plw
--- On Sun, 3/7/10, Larry Horlick wrote:
From: Larry Horlick
Subject:
t: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010, 5:54 PM
Any problems with RG-214 or RG223 for duplexers/multi- couplers/ combiners?
lh
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Dan Saputo wrote:
well-documented and caused main
com >
> To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com <
> Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com >
> Sent: Sun Mar 07 16:54:30 2010
> Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
>
>
>
> Any problems with RG-214 or RG223 for duplexers/multi-couplers/combiners?
>
> l
Norm
- Original Message -
From: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun Mar 07 16:54:30 2010
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
Any problems with RG-214 or RG223 for duplexers/multi-couplers/combiners?
lh
On Sun, Mar 7, 2010 at 5:50 PM, Dan S
t
> degrades. Although not as big of a problem with lmr due to an insulating
> layer over the actual foil. beware of belden 9913 and lmr look-alikes.
> trouble when used duplex.
>
> Dan
> k8plw
>
> --- On *Sun, 3/7/10, Chuck Kelsey * wrote:
>
>
> From: Chuck Kelsey
&g
. trouble when used
duplex.
Dan
k8plw
--- On Sun, 3/7/10, Chuck Kelsey wrote:
From: Chuck Kelsey
Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Date: Sunday, March 7, 2010, 4:56 PM
Passive Intermod. In other words, it tends to be a source in which intermod
Passive Intermod. In other words, it tends to be a source in which intermod
can be generated easily.
Chuck
WB2EDV
- Original Message -
From: "rffun"
To:
Sent: Sunday, March 07, 2010 3:33 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
>
> What exactly do you mean by PIM ?
> rffun
>
Passive Intermodulation. Things like rusty hardware or disimilar metals can
cause it in the presence of RF.
From: rffun
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Sun, March 7, 2010 2:33:33 PM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR Cable
What exactly do you mea
Yes, that was my point. Many of these cables do not experience flexing or
weather changes, yet exhibit the problems anyway.
Chuck
- Original Message -
From: "Laryn Lohman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2007 7:45 AM
Subject: [Repeater-Builder] Re: LMR cable
> --- I
ok, what's the paper called? Is it posted on MOL? If so, what folder is
it in?
Gary
Joe wrote:
Motorola also put out a white paper on braid-over-foil
cable and pointed out it's problems in a duplexed system. They did
not specifically name LMR cable, but it was obvious that they were talking
abo
Motorola also put out a white paper on braid-over-foil cable and pointed
out it's problems in a duplexed system. They did not specifically name LMR
cable, but it was obvious that they were talking about it and others.
Joe
At 10:48 PM 1/29/2007 +, you wrote:
Andrew has a technical paper
19 matches
Mail list logo
