Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reed vs. Reedless Boards in Mitrek Radios

2008-12-30 Thread Bob M.
You may find that after the PL signal goes through the modulator, the distortion is even lower. It also probably doesn't matter too much; 1% is still 40dB down. You probably don't know (yet) what component is producing that little bit of signal either; it could be some high-frequency noise

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reed vs. Reedless Boards in Mitrek Radios

2008-12-30 Thread Eric Lemmon
: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com [mailto:repeater-buil...@yahoogroups.com] On Behalf Of Bob M. Sent: Tuesday, December 30, 2008 5:12 AM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reed vs. Reedless Boards in Mitrek Radios You may find that after the PL signal goes through

Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reed vs. Reedless Boards in Mitrek Radios

2008-12-29 Thread rb_n3dab
With the reedless board chip being nothing more then a simple resister network, I wonder what your purity results might be if you built-up a 127.3 network using 1, 5,and 10% 1/8w resisters for comparison as well. -- Doug N3DAB/WPRX486/WPJL709 Eric Lemmon wb6...@verizon.net wrote:

RE: [Repeater-Builder] Reed vs. Reedless Boards in Mitrek Radios

2008-12-29 Thread Eric Lemmon
Of rb_n3...@tds.net Sent: Monday, December 29, 2008 9:28 PM To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com Cc: Eric Lemmon Subject: Re: [Repeater-Builder] Reed vs. Reedless Boards in Mitrek Radios With the reedless board chip being nothing more than a simple resister network, I wonder what your purity results