Jeff DePolo wrote:
>>Ok, I'll bite-what's AIP? I have a G707, and don't remember seeing
>>anything labeled like that.
>
>
> Kenwood's AIP = "Advanced Intercept Point". It reduces the sensitivity of
> the receiver which has the effect of reducing receiver-induced intermod by
> lowering the TOIP
ngler
Sent: Wednesday, February 15, 2006 3:08 PM
To: Repeater-Builder@yahoogroups.com
Subject: RE: Radio quality (was RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Power)
At 2/15/2006 09:46 AM, you wrote:
Ok, I'll bite-what's AIP? I have a G707, and don't
Subject: RE: Radio quality (was RE: [Repeater-Builder] UHF Power)
>
>
> At 2/15/2006 09:46 AM, you wrote:
> > > Ok, I'll bite-what's AIP? I have a G707, and don't
> remember seeing
> > > anything labeled like that.
> >
> >Kenwood's AIP
At 2/15/2006 09:46 AM, you wrote:
> > Ok, I'll bite-what's AIP? I have a G707, and don't remember seeing
> > anything labeled like that.
>
>Kenwood's AIP = "Advanced Intercept Point". It reduces the sensitivity of
>the receiver which has the effect of reducing receiver-induced intermod by
>lowerin
At 2/15/2006 09:41 AM, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Did you try the V7A with AIP on? I have a G707 (very similar RF
> > construction IIRC) & found it's performance similar: very sensitive RX but
> > horrible IMD performance: spur free dynamic range with AIP off is only 61
> > dB, whi
> Ok, I'll bite-what's AIP? I have a G707, and don't remember seeing
> anything labeled like that.
Kenwood's AIP = "Advanced Intercept Point". It reduces the sensitivity of
the receiver which has the effect of reducing receiver-induced intermod by
lowering the TOIP/compression point. Although I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Did you try the V7A with AIP on? I have a G707 (very similar RF
> construction IIRC) & found it's performance similar: very sensitive RX but
> horrible IMD performance: spur free dynamic range with AIP off is only 61
> dB, which is on par with some of my HTs. Turnin
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I was happy to find that the FT-857 will HAPPILY do split-tone.
>
> Yes, but kind of ridiculous to use an 857 just for VHF/UHF.
That's why you just use it for ALL the bands it'll work and enjoy the
split-tone feature in the process! ;-)
(Ooh, I was s close to g
At 2/13/2006 16:01, you wrote:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Speaking of which, I look with despair at Yaesu's newest offering, the
> > FT-1802, which STILL doesn't have split tone. We need more complaints
> sent
> > into the "big 3" about this.
>
>Know you're probably not looking for such a fu
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Speaking of which, I look with despair at Yaesu's newest offering, the
> FT-1802, which STILL doesn't have split tone. We need more complaints sent
> into the "big 3" about this.
Know you're probably not looking for such a full-featured rig for mobile
VHF/UHF repeat
At 2/12/2006 08:24, you wrote:
> > Did you try the V7A with AIP on?
>
>No, I didn't, but I'll do that later today if I get a chance. The other ham
>rig in my truck is the other Kenwood dual bander (TM-708? getting old and
>don't remember model #'s like I used to). I'm not sure but I think that h
> Did you try the V7A with AIP on?
No, I didn't, but I'll do that later today if I get a chance. The other ham
rig in my truck is the other Kenwood dual bander (TM-708? getting old and
don't remember model #'s like I used to). I'm not sure but I think that has
the AIP function too. I never d
At 2/11/2006 19:50, you wrote:
>OK, here are the results of my quick bench measurements for whatever it's
>worth.
>MOBILE RECEIVERS
>
>Kenwood TM-V7A (my most-hated radio): -125.0 dBm (0.13 uV)
>1.3 dB to 6.6 dB. Personally I'd argue that the TM-V7A should be
>disqualified too;
13 matches
Mail list logo
