[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg 1.0a6 release

2009-06-29 Thread Chris McDonough
repoze.bfg 1.0a5 was a bit of a browbag release. 1.0a6 has been released to fix the feature added in 1.0a5. The changelog is: 1.0a6 (2009-06-29) == Bug Fixes - - Use ``caller_package`` function instead of ``caller_module`` function within ``templating`` to avoid

[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg nginx mod_wsgi

2009-06-29 Thread Nathan Van Gheem
Anyone ever deploy repoze.bfg on nginx with mod_wsgi? Right now I'm just using proxy_pass to the paster serve for repoze.bfg, but it just seems more natural if this could be done using mod_wsgi. Any thoughts? Thanks, Nathan ___ Repoze-dev mailing list

[Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg 1.0 final to be released by Monday July 6.

2009-06-29 Thread Chris McDonough
If nobody finds any showstopper bugs, repoze.bfg 1.0 will be released on or before Monday July 6. Speak now or forever hold your peace wrt to API issues; after 1.0 the existing APIs will be frozen. - C ___ Repoze-dev mailing list

Re: [Repoze-dev] repoze.bfg 1.0 final to be released by Monday July 6.

2009-06-29 Thread Martin Aspeli
Chris McDonough wrote: If nobody finds any showstopper bugs, repoze.bfg 1.0 will be released on or before Monday July 6. Speak now or forever hold your peace wrt to API issues; after 1.0 the existing APIs will be frozen. No comments on the stability of the release at all, but it seems a

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg form generation

2009-06-29 Thread Tim Hoffman
Hi Iain I am using formish with some success at the moment. You need the latest copy from github, rather than whats in PyPI and if you want to use the FileUpload widget you may need to build a custom FileResource handler (I am running on GAE so write temp files to the filesystem is not an option

Re: [Repoze-dev] bfg form generation

2009-06-29 Thread Fernando Correa Neto
Hi Iain, At the time I started using BFG, the options I had didn't quite attracted me that much so I decided to roll it on my own. My main goal was to quickly create form widgets from python code using a XML factory ( template independent ). Today it's called repoze.etreeform [1] and although it

Re: [Repoze-dev] traversal vs url dispatch for rest'ish applications

2009-06-29 Thread Chris McDonough
On 6/29/09 8:26 PM, Iain Duncan wrote: I'm wondering what the conventional wisdom is for doing bfg apps to handle crud operations with urls like /pet - list pets /pet/1 - view pet model, id 1 /pet/1/view /pet/1/edit - edit pet model, id 1 Is this something that can be handled well

Re: [Repoze-dev] traversal vs url dispatch for rest'ish applications

2009-06-29 Thread Iain Duncan
Let's imagine a view pets: from webob import Response def pets(context, request): return Response ('OK') when a URL comes in that is for a paricular pet: from webob import Response def pets(context, request): if request.subpath: petnum = request.subpath[0]