It doesn't look like the fix for this CR ever got integrated, so I'd
like to request a sponsor for myself, with my intended fix being the
patch below (or alternatively that the bug just be closed as Not a
Bug)..
Thanks,
Ceri
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:37:23PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
On Wed
I'd like to record that John Beck has offered to sponsor me for:
6218640: should import NetBSD mailwrapper/mailer.conf
My SCA number is OS0135.
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
-- Moliere
-- next
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 07:18:52AM -0700, Fauzia Saeed wrote:
Bug#6707269 was putback to snv_96 by a Sun Employee:
http://monaco.sfbay/detail.jsf?cr=+http://monaco.sfbay/detail.jsf?cr=+6707269
However, as described in the comments, the original bug was sort of switched
around through a
On Tue, Aug 05, 2008 at 10:25:03AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
On Mon, Aug 04, 2008 at 05:55:19PM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Please remove the following bugs from the sponsor list the original
requester is no longer working on them:
6551524 su truncates LOGNAME
I'd like to request a sponsor to work on the above with; the fix appears
trivial at present (see
http://cr.opensolaris.org/~ceri/sbdadm_maxsize.diff).
My SCA number is OS0135.
Thanks,
Ceri
--
That must be wonderful! I don't understand it at all.
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 09:35:36AM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
And, if you were thinking of a more general facility for locating
files, whether or not they were delivered by packaging, I would
suggesting integrating GNU findutils into SFW. (findutils provides
locate(1).)
There is
I'd like to request a sponsor for bug 6339753, allowing nsswitch files
backends to use comments.
The fix is seemingly trivial but I particularly want guidance on whether
comments should only be allowed when they begin a new line, in order to
avoid breaking existing databases.
Anyway, my SCA # is
On Tue, Feb 12, 2008 at 03:21:20PM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
I'd like to request a sponsor for bug 6339753, allowing nsswitch files
backends to use comments.
The fix is seemingly trivial but I particularly want guidance on whether
comments should only be allowed when
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 11:15:40PM +, Ceri Davies wrote:
It occurs to me that I've been reviewing patches posted here where it
might not actually be welcome. Tell me to shut up if necessary,
although I'm concerned that this review should happen and preferably in
good time after
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 04:35:52PM +0530, Avinash Joshi wrote:
Hi.
I am working on the bug 6615447. My SCA number is 0S0142
I personally don't see how this is a bug at all, but the preferred idiom
for checking uninitialised shell variables is ${var:-default}, so the
diff would be something
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 06:51:48PM +0530, Rishi M Nair wrote:
Please ignore the previous mail in that diff is not taken in the correct
format
Bug ID -5079505
Synopsis - Clarification of /etc/syslog.conf comments
Category:Subcategory - utility:logger
--- syslog.conf.orig Tue Oct 2
It occurs to me that I've been reviewing patches posted here where it
might not actually be welcome. Tell me to shut up if necessary,
although I'm concerned that this review should happen and preferably in
good time after a submission is posted (rather than after the
potentially long wait for a
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:50:12AM +0530, Abhilash wrote:
Sir,
Me Abhilash T.g and Arjun Asok have a fix for the bug 6604652. We are the
students of amrita university.
Abhilash oso183
Arjun oso211
the synopsis is
See the following log:
bash-3.00# mount installtest:/export
Someone else already submitted a patch for this a few hours ago.
Ceri
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 04:29:25PM +0530, Rishi M Nair wrote:
Hi.
I am Rishi M Nair from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham.
me (Rishi M Nair) (OS0148 - rishios) and jazarine (just applied for a SCA)
are
interested in working on
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 12:16:12PM +0530, Abhilash wrote:
Sir,
I Abhilash T.G and Arjun Asok of Amrita University Abhilash oso183 and
Arjun oso211 have a fix for the bug 6440628 .
we are attaching the diff.
Hmm. I am about to sound quite negative, but I aim to help; please
don't be
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 04:45:44AM -0800, Avinash Joshi wrote:
Hi.
I am Avinash Joshi from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham.
Rishi M Nair (OS0148 - rishios) and me (OS0142 - avinashj) are
interested in working on bugid 6457020.
Bug ID - 6457020
Synopsis - *find* find should offer assistance
On Sun, Jan 20, 2008 at 06:53:02PM +0530, Rishi M Nair wrote:
Hi.
I am Rishi M Nair from Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham.
me (Rishi M Nair) (OS0148 - rishios) and Avinash Joshi (OS0142 - avinashj)
are
interested in working on bugid 6557253
Bug ID - 6557253
Synopsis - dispadmin.c:usage[]
On Mon, Jan 14, 2008 at 01:01:07PM -0700, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
Thanks Bonnie.
My apologies for the duplication; I had checked the page at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/bug_reports/oss_bite_size/ but I assume
there is another table somewhere? Perhaps they could be
cross
Questions and comments not necessarily targeted at Ashwin here:
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 12:24:14PM +0530, ashwin wrote:
Hi all
My SCA # is OS0144
I would like to request a sponsor for Bug Id 4968927
the comment for EPERM error should match in the following two files
On Sun, Dec 16, 2007 at 10:03:24AM -0600, Tom Haynes wrote:
Ceri Davies wrote:
Finally, is it expected that someone requesting a sponsor have a patch
that they consider final to be done, or is a WIP allowed?
Ceri
It can be either. And it can also be the case that they haven't started
On Fri, Dec 14, 2007 at 03:28:13PM +, Darren J Moffat wrote:
In addition to what Casper said addition of pfzsh would require ARC
approval. Given that the FGAP project intends to do away with the
requirement for modified versions of the shell PSARC may or may not approve
the
On Wed, Dec 12, 2007 at 04:18:15PM +0100, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
I threw pfzsh together yesterday afternoon using the SFW framework, and
would like to request a sponsor to evaluate my work and help me get it
integrated.
I note that the CR is currently assigned to Casper Dik and so
Tony,
I agree with your suggestion; I assume you don't need me to reissue the
patch?
Thanks again,
Ceri
On Mon, Oct 15, 2007 at 10:55:48AM -0700, Tony Nguyen wrote:
Hi Ceri,
No problem. I agree that test case in the report is sufficient. I have one
nit on the change.
Lines 336-344:
Hello,
I would like to request a sponsor for the following bug:
6611124 inetconv may create manifests that svccfg cannot import
A patch with my proposed and tested fix is available at:
http://shrike.submonkey.net/~ceri/os/6611124/
The patch is against the onnv-gate branch.
My contributor
24 matches
Mail list logo
