Apache2 configuration help

2009-01-08 Thread Graham Borland
I have read through the Getting Started page on the Wiki, and I'm stuck with configuring apache2. I have run the installation script, the database has been created, and my reviewboard directory exists under /var/www/ (on Ubuntu 8.04). Pointing a browser at this directory just gives a file

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-08 Thread Muhammad Haggag
On Wed, Jan 7, 2009 at 12:43 PM, SamClark pimp.roc...@gmail.com wrote: Well if I hack the file to look exactly like the svn diff output I get the 'patch didn't apply cleanly' issue, which is expected i guess. The patch command doesn't output anything. It just fails silently and doesn't

Newbie question: setup problems

2009-01-08 Thread Phil
I'm trying to install Review Board so our group can try it out. I think I've installed all of the essentials and am now trying to run the rb-site script to set up a site with this environment: -- python 2.5 -- sqlite3 -- memcached -- apache Sqlite3 is complaining that it cannot open the database

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-08 Thread SamClark
Okay, I noticed something interesting. I think I've been running the patch.exe in cygwin\bin (GnuWin32\bin and cygwin\bin are both on my PATH but GnuWin32\bin doesn't contain patch). I think I'm using the same diffutils package as you but it doesn't come with the patch tool. Anyway that would

Re: Post-review version 0.8: The patch to ... didn't apply cleanly

2009-01-08 Thread SamClark
Scratch that, patch.exe that came with cygwin works. I think I've been running PATCH.EXE under c:\WINDOWS. Hope this isn't netbus but thats my problem and another discussion. So now that PATCH.EXE is gone I can post a review by hand and view the diff properly. Thanks for the help. Somewhat

Re: Newbie question: setup problems

2009-01-08 Thread Chris Clark
Phil wrote: .Sqlite3 is complaining that it cannot open the database file. (sqlite3.OperationalError: unable to open database file) Has anyone else had this problem? My understanding is that Python 2.5 includes sqlite thus I wouldn't have to install it again -- is this incorrect? Have

Re: Newbie question: setup problems

2009-01-08 Thread Jeff Andros
I had this problem too... make sure your web user has permissions not only on the sqlite file, but on the directory it resides in as well. Jeff O|||O 2009/1/8 Chris Clark chris.cl...@ingres.com Phil wrote: .Sqlite3 is complaining that it cannot open the database file.

automate rb-site install

2009-01-08 Thread Rusty Burchfield
Is it possible to automate an rb-site install? The help doesn't list an option for this, and piping in data isn't sufficient due to the password prompts. ~Rusty --~--~-~--~~~---~--~~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups

Re: automate rb-site install

2009-01-08 Thread Christian Hammond
Not yet but it's on my TODO list. If someone wants to help speed it along, I'll welcome a patch that adds parameters for each piece of data we need and a flag for telling it to automate. Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at 3:34 PM, Rusty

Re: automate rb-site install

2009-01-08 Thread Rusty Burchfield
On Jan 8, 3:59 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: Not yet but it's on my TODO list. If someone wants to help speed it along, I'll welcome a patch that adds parameters for each piece of data we need and a flag for telling it to automate. Cool. I will poke at it this weekend to

Upgrade Error: Table reviews_reviewrequest_changedesc already exists

2009-01-08 Thread mary
Hi, I'm trying to upgrade to the latest and greatest reviewboard svn code base as I routinely do but, when I run the database evolution I get the following error: Error applying evolution: (1050, Table 'reviews_reviewrequest_changedescs' already exists) Full error below... [reviewboard]$ sudo

Re: Upgrade Error: Table reviews_reviewrequest_changedesc already exists

2009-01-08 Thread Christian Hammond
How old was your previous install? That table was added to the database many months ago, and I haven't heard of it causing any problems. Did you at any point upgrade, then downgrade to an older version? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com VMware, Inc. On Thu, Jan 8, 2009 at

Re: Upgrade Error: Table reviews_reviewrequest_changedesc already exists

2009-01-08 Thread mary
Previously I was at revision #1556 (2008-10-27) I have never downgraded. I do have this table already as the error message states. Is there anyway to move on past this error? On Jan 8, 4:56 pm, Christian Hammond chip...@chipx86.com wrote: How old was your previous install? That table was

Re: Upgrade Error: Table reviews_reviewrequest_changedesc already exists

2009-01-08 Thread Christian Hammond
It sounds like something was hand-modified in the database enough to break things then. Basically, Django-Evolution keeps track of all changes to the structure of the database, and something surprised it. Is there any data in that table in your database? The only things I can think of are: 1)

Issue 804 in reviewboard: Diff viewer dies when a git diff contains removed files

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Status: New Owner: Labels: Type-Defect Priority-Medium New issue 804 by jeff.hammerbacher: Diff viewer dies when a git diff contains removed files http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=804 *NOTE: Do not post confidential information in this bug report.* What's the URL of

Issue 666 in reviewboard: view diff causes Error - cvs.py

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #7 on issue 666 by onkarshinde: view diff causes Error - cvs.py http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=666 I saw same problem on my Ubuntu machine. The cause was that cvs was not installed. See of that is the problem in your case. Check if cvs binary is in path on

Issue 806 in reviewboard: Description box

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #2 on issue 806 by jefflamb: Description box http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=806 Oops, sorry. Wasn't thinking. We just updated yesterday. It's rev 1668. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you

Issue 806 in reviewboard: Description box

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Labels: Component-Reviews Milestone-Release1.0 Browser Comment #3 on issue 806 by chipx86: Description box http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=806 Okay. Interesting.. I'll try to get a copy of Chrome installed on here when I get

Issue 806 in reviewboard: Description box

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #5 on issue 806 by chipx86: Description box http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=806 That's definitely good to know. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or because you starred this issue. You may adjust your

Issue 807 in reviewboard: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly.

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #1 on issue 807 by jefflamb: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=807 Can you please edit the above to remove my company name and delete this comment as well? Thanks. -- You received

Issue 807 in reviewboard: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly.

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #3 on issue 807 by jefflamb: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=807 Lame. Oh well. -- You received this message because you are listed in the owner or CC fields of this issue, or

Issue 807 in reviewboard: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly.

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Comment #4 on issue 807 by jefflamb: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=807 By the way, this is severely annoying when you want a little context for the comment, but your diff is HUGE. -- You

Issue 807 in reviewboard: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly.

2009-01-08 Thread codesite-noreply
Updates: Status: Confirmed Owner: chipx86 Labels: Component-DiffViewer Component-Reviews Comment #5 on issue 807 by chipx86: Links from reviews do not link to the corresponding line in the diff properly. http://code.google.com/p/reviewboard/issues/detail?id=807 A new