All,
I am trying to upgrade from 2.0.20 -> 2.5.3.
I do this by taking a backup of the 2.0.20 database then importing into
MySQL and then running the rb-site upgrade.
However I get the following output:
Updating database. This may take a while.
The log output below, including warnings and
I too had this issue (MySQL default changing from MyISAM to InnoDB).
Although I understand that this is caused by MySQL version being updated at
the same time as a Reviewboard Update (and migrate).
But would there be any way for the 'upgrade' logic of Reviewboard to post a
more useful error
WE are running 2.0.17 and have managed to create a situation and dont know
how to resolve it - or whether its a defect
Someone created 2 reviews with code changes that were dependent.
They marked Review 2 as Depends On Review 1 - this then updated the
'Blocks' field.
They then marked Review 1
, 15 February 2015 21:20:00 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote:
After some investigation we found the following:
# TODO: This can break on systems that don't have the en_US local
# installed (which isn't very many). Ideally in this case, we could
# put something in the config file, but that's not plumbed
wrote:
Hi Daniel,
Do you think you could add some code to print out the contents of 'log'
inside _convert_symbolic_revision before we try to construct the etree?
Thanks,
-David
On Fri Jan 30 2015 at 4:48:37 AM Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com
javascript: wrote:
We have a shared
We have a shared Debian server and we have updated RBtools to 0.7.
When we try to post a review we get the following:
SERVER_NAME rbt post -d NUM
RBTools 0.7
Python 2.7.3 (default, Mar 13 2014, 11:03:55)
[GCC 4.7.2]
Running on Linux-3.2.0-4-amd64-x86_64-with-debian-7.8
Home =
All,
Before I try and write some python that queries all users (ideally active)
and gets their email addresses. Has anyone else done this and would you be
willing to share?
I want to be able to announce things like RBtools 0.7 to all active users
and cant think of another way (other than the
I am using RBtools 0.6.3 and am trying to post a review to ReviewBoard.
We use SVN as our version control system.
We are not using the .reviewboardrc files but the reviewboard:url property
as this means less files in the workspace.
For most of our repos this works fine and rbt post creates a
...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - https://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - https://www.beanbaginc.com
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com javascript:
Reply: revie...@googlegroups.com javascript: revie...@googlegroups.com
javascript:
Date
All,
Since RB 1.5 I have backed up the RB installation everynight be by using
mysqldump user=x password=y reviewboard backup.sql
I have also backed up all attachments etc.
I could then restore the data easily with another script.
I used this method to upgrade from 1.7.25 - 2.0.11 and with the
:' in it, though.
Christian
--
Christian Hammond - chi...@chipx86.com javascript:
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com
On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 4:32 AM, Daniel Laird daniel@googlemail.com
javascript: wrote:
To follow up the error
All,
We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of methods to
create review requests:
svn diff - manually upload
post-review
rbt
I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem to have hit an issue.
Some of our reviews no longer display it suggests that a file cant be
by
SVN diff.
Cheers
Dan
On Thursday, 18 December 2014 11:29:18 UTC, Daniel Laird wrote:
All,
We were running Reviewboard 1.7.25 and people used a number of methods to
create review requests:
svn diff - manually upload
post-review
rbt
I have just migrated us to Reviewboard 2.0.11 and seem
All,
My company have a TeamForge service running and are using GIT as the
default SCM.
I have a local Reviewboard server and would like to point it at the GIT
repo - instead of using the default code review tool of gerrit
I am using Reviewboard 1.7.25 currently
The TeamForge project says that
All,
We are currently using post-review and Reviewboard 1.7.25 (RBtools 0.5.1).
We added a new Repo to Reviewboard and its listed as repository 26.
However when we try to post a new review to Reviewboard we get:
DEBUG:root:repository info: Path: http://server/svn/repo_name, Base path:
/trunk,
That sorted it - thank you.
Cheers
Dan
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 21:49:26 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote:
The fix itself is in djblets 1.7.26. If you upgrade to Review Board 1.7.25
you'll get the latest djblets along with it.
-David
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:01 PM, Daniel Laird
daniel
All,
I wish to change the name of a repository in Reviewboard (am using it in a
RB extension).
However when i change the field and enter the authentication details I just
get a box that says
'Please correct the error below'
However nothing in shown.
I have check the logs and nothing is
We are running 0.7.9
/usr/local/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/Djblets-0.7.9-py2.6.egg
Cheers
Dan
On Tuesday, 13 May 2014 10:07:55 UTC+1, David Trowbridge wrote:
Dan,
What version of djblets is installed?
-David
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 1:28 AM, Daniel Laird
daniel
I am running 1.7.18 and having this problem.
I could upgrade to 1.7.25 if you think that will fix it?
Dan
--
Get the Review Board Power Pack at http://www.reviewboard.org/powerpack/
---
Sign up for Review Board hosting at RBCommons: https://rbcommons.com/
---
Happy user? Let us know at
AM, Daniel Laird
daniel@googlemail.comjavascript:
wrote:
All,
Due to various issue my development server has to be re-purposed as the
main server.
This has meant I have to revert from 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25 (the latest stable
version).
At this point I usually import the database and media
All,
Due to various issue my development server has to be re-purposed as the
main server.
This has meant I have to revert from 2.0RC2 - 1.7.25 (the latest stable
version).
At this point I usually import the database and media files and all works
ok.
However I get the following:
Traceback
.
If it spins indefinitely, it may mean that you haven't logged in to Review
Board, thus the authentication cookie isn't set.
Currently, you *cannot* log in via the extension itself (I am working on
that).
- Kiro
On Monday, 22 April 2013 08:56:14 UTC-7, Daniel Laird wrote:
I have downloaded
I have downloaded and installed it - I have then pointed it at my company
server.
But it just spins - with the busy icon.
Does it require anonymous access or anything as it does not seem to be
asking for username/password?
Dan
On Saturday, April 20, 2013 12:15:31 AM UTC+1, Kirollos Risk
I just found this pack of extensions and saw the XML Review Extension.
However there is little explaining what this does or how it enhances the
process of reviewing XML.
Can anyone tell me what it adds? I thought I had installed it properly and
then looked at a review with XML files and noted
Very exciting - I look forward to getting this installed.
One question I have is about RBTools?
I am using ReviewBot and that depends on the API branch of RBtools.
Do you know if the API branch is going to be merged / released at the same
time?
Also I understand there was a plan for a Python
Has anyone managed to patch or modify reviewboard so that diffs generated
under SVN 1.7 actually work with post-review and ReviewBoard?
The upgrade to SVN is about to hit my department and it will be a shame to
stop reviewing code as a result of this change
Dan
--
Want to help the
...@chipx86.com
Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org
VMware, Inc. - http://www.vmware.com
On Fri, Aug 3, 2012 at 6:39 AM, Daniel Laird
daniel.j.la...@googlemail.com wrote:
I have tried to install this release.
I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by
specifying
I have tried to install this release.
I had to manually installed Djblets 0.7 and then I could install by
specifying -f to easy_install.
Onc done I then did
rb-site upgrade /path/my/site
This took a while and generated the following:
Upgrading Review Board from 1.6.11 to 1.7 beta 1
There are
I am using post-review to generate my diff requests and post them to my
reviewboard instance.
One of my SVN servers has restricted access, as such I mark it as non
publically accessible and add all the Users /Groups that can access it.
The problem is when I run post-review it fails to find the
Hi,
I am going to use rb-site to dump the data and then import onto a new
webserver.
Whilst trying to check out the options I noticed that when I do rb-site -h
there is no help regarding the manage options.
I am going to check the source code - but is this intentional or just an
oversight?
30 matches
Mail list logo
