Re: Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-10 Thread Christian Hammond
Hi Simo, While I'd love to say we could provide an official plugin for that, we simply don't have the time to do it. I'm hoping to grow our business to the point where we can put people on that type of work. For now, there's nothing I can really do to help there. It'll need to remain a third-part

Re: Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-10 Thread Simona Avornicesei
> > Hi Chris, > So we're using Hg with TortoiseHg client for .NET projects. As a drawback to developing in MS world, most of the .NET developers hate command line. I cannot ask them to use RBTools. However there's a TortoiseHg plugin for review-board

Re: Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-08 Thread John Yates
On Fri, Mar 7, 2014 at 4:16 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > Review Board 2.0 has a new concept of "approval" that can be customized by > extensions. See > http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/extending/extensions/hooks/review-request-approval-hook/ > > There's also work being done on hooks fo

Re: Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-07 Thread Christian Hammond
Review Board 2.0 has a new concept of "approval" that can be customized by extensions. See http://www.reviewboard.org/docs/manual/dev/extending/extensions/hooks/review-request-approval-hook/ There's also work being done on hooks for Mercurial and Git that would allow you to enforce that a review r

Re: Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-07 Thread Christian Hammond
It does include DVCS support and new hooks for enforcing review request approval before commit. Which features specifically are you wondering about? Christian -- Christian Hammond - chip...@chipx86.com Review Board - http://www.reviewboard.org Beanbag, Inc. - http://www.beanbaginc.com On Fri,

Re: Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-07 Thread Simona Avornicesei
> > Hi Chris, > I was impressed by RB and still looks great for our needs but the integration with TortoiseHg is bad. I would say it's not working at all. What I was hoping to acomplish and hoping to push to the client as the new way of ensuring the code quality (by not allowing merges until th

Re: Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-07 Thread John Yates
On Thu, Mar 6, 2014 at 4:45 PM, Christian Hammond wrote: > We have a lot we want to do in this coming year, both on the open source > and commercial fronts. > Chris, Do those plans include anything re Gerrit? Much as I love RB's UI I have given up (at least for now) having my company adopt RB b

Looking to talk to a few happy Review Board users

2014-03-06 Thread Christian Hammond
Hey everyone, As most of you know, we've been pretty busy getting Review Board 2.0 ready for a release. That's not all that we've been busy with, though. We've also been building up our business, Beanbag, where we've been putting together RBCommons