Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/302#issuecomment-39419969
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13719/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/302#issuecomment-39419968
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39420353
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39420359
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/273#issuecomment-39420452
ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#issuecomment-39420831
Hey @tgravescs, just so I understand, what purpose does the intermediate
directory serve in this case? It seems like if the file is visible to other
users in the intermed
Github user ueshin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/283#issuecomment-39421176
@mridulm Thank you for your reply.
There are 2 points I have to mention about memory:
- Before shuffle
If data are sorted, no more memory is needed be
Github user velvia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39421885
Sorry, but how do I do a rebase safely, now that I've pushed?I've never
had good luck with rebases (other than rebase -i before I push sorry
should have done
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39421942
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13720/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39421940
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/304#issuecomment-39423138
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/304#issuecomment-39423129
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user sryza commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/304#issuecomment-39423212
Thanks for the tip Reynold. Updated patch fixes the comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Clone a new copy of your fork just to be safe; checkout your SPARK-1154
branch; git pull --rebase g...@github.com:apache/spark.git master; now your
and Kelvin's changes should appear last, after everything that is already
in master; push origin +SPARK-1154-cleanup-app-folders -- and you're golden.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39424549
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13721/
---
If your project i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/97#issuecomment-39424548
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#issuecomment-39427646
Build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#issuecomment-39427670
Build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fe
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/274#discussion_r11243352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/EmptyRDD.scala ---
@@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.{Partition, SparkContext,
TaskContext}
/**
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/274#discussion_r11243339
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/CoGroupedRDD.scala ---
@@ -57,6 +57,7 @@ private[spark] class CoGroupPartition(idx: Int, val deps:
Array[CoGrou
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/274#discussion_r11243369
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PartitionPruningRDD.scala ---
@@ -21,7 +21,8 @@ import scala.reflect.ClassTag
import org.apache.spar
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/274#discussion_r11243475
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/FileLogger.scala ---
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ import org.apache.spark.io.CompressionCodec
* @param compress Whet
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/274#discussion_r11243501
--- Diff: graphx/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/graphx/package.scala ---
@@ -19,7 +19,10 @@ package org.apache.spark
import org.apache.spark.util.colle
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/274#discussion_r11243534
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/TaskContext.scala ---
@@ -21,6 +21,11 @@ import scala.collection.mutable.ArrayBuffer
import org.apache.sp
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/304#issuecomment-39429342
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13722/
---
If your project is set up for it, you can r
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/304#issuecomment-39429341
Merged build finished.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/307#issuecomment-39429880
Ah I should have looked more at this. The dependency is just to bring in
some annotations that were later standardized. We do not use them, and so do
not need any copy, inc
GitHub user scwf opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/312
method getAllPools in SC throws NPE
SLF4J: Class path contains multiple SLF4J bindings.
SLF4J: Found binding in
[jar:file:/home/wangfei/spark0403/spark-master/examples/target/scala-2.10/spark-exampl
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/312#issuecomment-39431227
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/312#issuecomment-39431524
TaskSchedulerImpl should override rootPool method
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your proj
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#issuecomment-39432280
Build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/268#issuecomment-39432281
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13723/
---
If your project
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/312#issuecomment-39434966
i am wrong, i think this is an order issue, it is a matter of the order of
starting of ui and the taskScheduler in sc
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/310#discussion_r11246612
--- Diff: bin/spark-shell ---
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ function resolve_spark_master(){
fi
if [ -z "$MASTER" ]; then
-MASTER="$DEF
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#issuecomment-39449932
Its not readable by other users in the intermediate directory. Sorry I
didn't explain fully. That directory itself is 1777, sticky bit set, world
writable. Each user
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39450885
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39450898
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#issuecomment-39453542
Also to clarify that the history files are actually first written to the
users staging directory, which is only user readable/writable, and then moved
over to done_inter
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#issuecomment-39454420
First of all I would like to say great work, having this history server is
awesome!!
I'm trying it out on a non-secure yarn cluster but when I run something
tha
Github user AndreSchumacher commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39457091
@marmbrus Thanks again for the comments and changes. I shuffled the imports
and removed the additions to SQLContext. Also moved the insert examples to the
tests ra
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39457180
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/195#issuecomment-39457183
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13724/
---
If your project
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#discussion_r11253731
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#discussion_r11254082
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#discussion_r11254543
--- Diff: sbin/start-history-server.sh ---
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
+#!/usr/bin/env bash
+
+#
+# Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#discussion_r11256081
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#discussion_r11256259
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Found
Github user aarondav commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/310#discussion_r11261202
--- Diff: bin/spark-shell ---
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@ function resolve_spark_master(){
fi
if [ -z "$MASTER" ]; then
-MASTER="$D
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/310#issuecomment-39476946
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/310#issuecomment-39476959
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user sryza opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/313
SPARK-1350. Always use JAVA_HOME to run executor container JVMs.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/sryza/spark sandy-spark-1350
Alte
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/313#issuecomment-39478597
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/313#issuecomment-39478612
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/204#discussion_r11262132
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/history/HistoryServer.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,221 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Founda
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39481008
@velvia what happens if you just close and re-open the pull request? Will
that work?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11263139
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleaner.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11263287
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleaner.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11263323
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleaner.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user aarondav commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39482892
rebasing and then force pushing isn't kind to Git, but GitHub does handle
it well.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/248#issuecomment-39482957
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/275#issuecomment-39483020
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11263798
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleaner.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/310#issuecomment-39483328
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/310#issuecomment-39483329
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13725/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/248#issuecomment-39483451
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/248#issuecomment-39483466
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/295#issuecomment-39483627
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11263980
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ContextCleaner.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,196 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11264135
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -65,26 +65,36 @@ private[spark] class
MapOutputTrackerMasterActor(tracker: MapOut
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/295#issuecomment-39484050
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/295#issuecomment-39484062
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11264351
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/MapOutputTracker.scala ---
@@ -194,17 +194,43 @@ private[spark] class MapOutputTracker(conf:
SparkConf) extends
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/313#issuecomment-39485509
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13726/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/313#issuecomment-39485508
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39485564
Rebasing is no big deal if the commits that you are rebasing are only in a
private repo. For example, even though https://github.com/markhamstra/spark is
technically
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/158#discussion_r11264777
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -669,7 +717,7 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
// Either we
Github user markhamstra commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/307#issuecomment-39486891
Looks like just removing the findbugs jsr305 dependency entirely works
fine, but bumping the Guava version not so much. I'm going to change the name
of this JIRA and
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11265456
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/broadcast/HttpBroadcast.scala ---
@@ -183,20 +197,48 @@ private object HttpBroadcast extends Logging {
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11265542
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -641,7 +643,11 @@ class SparkContext(
* [[org.apache.spark.broadcast.Broadcast
Github user tgravescs commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/313#issuecomment-39488004
Change looks good to me. Will wait to see if anyone else has comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on G
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/307#issuecomment-39488330
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/307#issuecomment-39488315
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/303#discussion_r11265870
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -427,28 +430,49 @@ object ClientBase {
}
def po
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/128#issuecomment-39489093
BTW if you want this to go to 1.0, it would be good to make these changes
soon. We can potentially also include it without Windows support, and mark the
folder stuff as exp
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/189#issuecomment-39489309
Hey Will, sorry for the really late reply, still interested in having this
go in, at least with the simple version. I've just been swamped with other
reviews.
---
If your
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/303#discussion_r11266231
--- Diff:
yarn/common/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientBase.scala ---
@@ -427,28 +430,49 @@ object ClientBase {
}
def po
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39489375
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266262
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/api/java/JavaRDDLike.scala
---
@@ -282,6 +283,17 @@ trait JavaRDDLike[T, This <: JavaRDDLike[T, This]]
extends S
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266266
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/189#issuecomment-39489560
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/189#issuecomment-39489550
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39489554
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#issuecomment-39489572
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266352
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user velvia commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/288#issuecomment-39489767
Mark, thanks. Yeah, I realize instead of doing a merge I should just do a
pull now, but it's probably too late for this PR. Instead I'll close it
and reopen and squ
Github user mateiz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/156#discussion_r11266448
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -664,6 +664,24 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
}
/**
+ * Return
Github user pwendell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/126#discussion_r11266501
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkEnv.scala ---
@@ -180,12 +180,24 @@ object SparkEnv extends Logging {
}
}
+
Github user mateiz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/189#issuecomment-39489148
Jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/248#issuecomment-39490054
All automated tests passed.
Refer to this link for build results:
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/13727/
---
If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/248#issuecomment-39490052
Merged build finished. All automated tests passed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
1 - 100 of 329 matches
Mail list logo
