Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3844#issuecomment-68419761
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user watermen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3237#issuecomment-68419717
@tdas I had fixed the conflicts, but I don't know why bracket on line 56
does not align with bracket on line 60 in MimaExcludes.scala.
---
If your project is set up for
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3845#issuecomment-68419679
[Test build #24930 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24930/consoleFull)
for PR 3845 at commit
[`114ec73`](https://githu
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3841#discussion_r22373227
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1691,15 +1691,12 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
Github user guowei2 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3821#issuecomment-68419415
@marmbrus i figured out it in the issue. in this case, execution
`TakeOrdered` invokes `convertRowToScala` to change `Decimal` into
`BigDecimal`.
i've tried to rem
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3841#issuecomment-68419355
[Test build #24928 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24928/consoleFull)
for PR 3841 at commit
[`396c226`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3237#issuecomment-68419360
[Test build #24929 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24929/consoleFull)
for PR 3237 at commit
[`f6ac3cb`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3237#issuecomment-68419177
[Test build #24927 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24927/consoleFull)
for PR 3237 at commit
[`3b9d5cf`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3841#discussion_r22373048
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1691,15 +1691,12 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3841#discussion_r22373041
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1719,6 +1716,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
serv
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3851#issuecomment-68418799
[Test build #24926 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24926/consoleFull)
for PR 3851 at commit
[`04c3e64`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3852#issuecomment-68418798
[Test build #24925 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24925/consoleFull)
for PR 3852 at commit
[`c8c4877`](https://githu
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3841#discussion_r22373021
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -1691,15 +1691,12 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
/**
GitHub user jerryshao opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3852
[SPARK-5028][Streaming]Add total received and processed records metrics to
Streaming UI
This is a follow-up work of
[SPARK-4537](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-4537). Adding total
r
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3841#discussion_r22372988
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -176,6 +176,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends Logging
with
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3837#issuecomment-68418668
Hi @marmbrus, yes, standard sql support this, see this sql(one of TPCDS )
for PR 3561 at commit
[`14daa20`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3561#issuecomment-68418611
I've merged #3739 into `master`, so this should be ready to retest.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitH
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3561#issuecomment-68418615
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user jongyoul commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3741#issuecomment-68418600
@tnachen Please review my patch, again.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3841#issuecomment-68418574
I set `spark.port.maxRetries` to 1 in spark-defaults.conf and ran 3 SparkPi
example using yarn-client mode in one node. Logs in 3 drivers' side were:
>14/12/31
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3739
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3849#issuecomment-68418485
[Test build #24923 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24923/consoleFull)
for PR 3849 at commit
[`cbe4d76`](https://githu
Github user joyyoj closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1755
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user joyyoj commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1755#issuecomment-68418459
Never mind, very very sorry for replay so late.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3739#issuecomment-68418439
I'm going to merge this into `master` (1.3.0) to unblock some PRs that are
depending on this cleanup. I'll work on backports to the other branches, too,
since some of
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3849#discussion_r22372823
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -180,7 +189,7 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
// Run the a
Github user zsxwing commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2855#discussion_r22372752
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -425,8 +425,7 @@ private[spark] object Utils extends Logging {
conf: SparkCon
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3844#discussion_r22372739
--- Diff:
external/mqtt/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/mqtt/MQTTStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -17,31 +17,58 @@
package org.apache.spark.streami
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3844#discussion_r22372726
--- Diff:
external/mqtt/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/mqtt/MQTTStreamSuite.scala
---
@@ -17,31 +17,58 @@
package org.apache.spark.streami
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3851#issuecomment-68417620
[Test build #24921 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24921/consoleFull)
for PR 3851 at commit
[`04c3e64`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3851#issuecomment-68417622
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3844#issuecomment-68417591
[Test build #24922 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24922/consoleFull)
for PR 3844 at commit
[`e8b6623`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-68417484
[Test build #24920 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24920/consoleFull)
for PR 3637 at commit
[`255c7f3`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-68417486
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user witgo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3707#issuecomment-68417443
Seems to be the issue caused by the command line is killed.
But,I tested both in the mac os x and centos, and could not reproduce the
issue.
---
If your project is set
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3844#issuecomment-68417426
Jenksin, this is ok to test.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2984#issuecomment-68417417
If this PR is not useful any more, mind closing this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If y
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2703#issuecomment-68417363
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3842#issuecomment-68417257
A quick pass shows me that `spark-streaming-flume` uses the following from
the `spark-streaming-flume-sink` module
- The generated Avro protocol classes - SparkFlumeProtc
Github user CodingCat commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3816#issuecomment-68417133
Hi, @sryza,
yes, NO_PREF tasks will be scheduled only when the maxLocality is NO_PREF.
Now, I think it's safe to apply this change, since we have that
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3842#issuecomment-68417061
Just wondering what is necessity for binary compatibility here? I am
guessing that one should be able to operation Spark Streaming 1.2 programs with
a deployed Sink from 1.0
Github user haiyangsea commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3839#discussion_r22372432
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -29,13 +29,14 @@ import org.apache.spark.sql.TestData._
import org.a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-68416333
[Test build #24919 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24919/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
[`cf982d2`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-68416337
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2703#issuecomment-68415747
I'll take a look this weekend when I have some time.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3850#issuecomment-68415602
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3850#issuecomment-68415599
**[Test build #24914 timed
out](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24914/consoleFull)**
for PR 3850 at commit
[`ae9b94a`](https://git
Github user tgaloppo commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3022#issuecomment-68415536
@jkbradley No problem. Let's start with 5020, and I'll move on from there.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3851#issuecomment-68415340
[Test build #24921 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24921/consoleFull)
for PR 3851 at commit
[`04c3e64`](https://githu
Github user tdas commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2703#issuecomment-68415266
Ping?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3851#issuecomment-68415123
Jenkins, test this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68415108
[Test build #24918 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24918/consoleFull)
for PR 3848 at commit
[`00adf40`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68415109
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-68415080
[Test build #24920 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24920/consoleFull)
for PR 3637 at commit
[`255c7f3`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3778#issuecomment-68414980
[Test build #24917 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24917/consoleFull)
for PR 3778 at commit
[`9570211`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3778#issuecomment-68414986
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user derrickburns commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2634#issuecomment-68414436
No problem. Thx!
Sent from my iPhone
> On Dec 30, 2014, at 3:23 PM, Xiangrui Meng
wrote:
>
> @derrickburns I'm going to check the implemen
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3022#issuecomment-68414406
@tgaloppo It's ideal if we assign & fix one JIRA at a time (as separate
PRs). Can I start by assigning one of your choosing?
For 5018, there is only [one othe
Github user chenghao-intel closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3800
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user chenghao-intel commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3800#issuecomment-68413730
Yea, I agree and closing this PR. :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3851#issuecomment-68412691
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
GitHub user brennonyork opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3851
[SPARK-794][Core] Remove sleep() in ClusterScheduler.stop
Removed `sleep()` from the `stop()` method of the `TaskSchedulerImpl` class
which, from the JIRA ticket, is believed to be a legacy arti
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-68412433
[Test build #24919 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24919/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
[`cf982d2`](https://githu
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3849#issuecomment-68412414
Hmm, looks like this failed MiMa checks due to the addition of a new method
to a public interface:
```
[info] spark-core: found 1 potential binary incompati
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3720#issuecomment-68412287
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3720#issuecomment-68412281
[Test build #24911 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24911/consoleFull)
for PR 3720 at commit
[`213d163`](https://gith
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3836
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3836#issuecomment-68412122
LGTM. Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-68411669
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-68411664
[Test build #24913 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24913/consoleFull)
for PR 3637 at commit
[`1bb315f`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3836#issuecomment-68411538
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3836#issuecomment-68411535
[Test build #24910 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24910/consoleFull)
for PR 3836 at commit
[`4e13133`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68411286
[Test build #24918 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24918/consoleFull)
for PR 3848 at commit
[`00adf40`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-68411084
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3637#issuecomment-68411078
[Test build #24912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24912/consoleFull)
for PR 3637 at commit
[`bb02582`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3778#issuecomment-68410976
[Test build #24917 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24917/consoleFull)
for PR 3778 at commit
[`9570211`](https://githu
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3778#issuecomment-68410961
Sure, updated!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3849#issuecomment-68410774
[Test build #24908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24908/consoleFull)
for PR 3849 at commit
[`9d8d4d1`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3849#issuecomment-68410782
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68410695
[Test build #24916 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24916/consoleFull)
for PR 3848 at commit
[`623cf91`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68410696
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-68410619
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68410615
[Test build #24916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24916/consoleFull)
for PR 3848 at commit
[`623cf91`](https://githu
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-68410616
[Test build #24915 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24915/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
[`445b57b`](https://gith
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68410581
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3778#issuecomment-68410453
Oh I see, sorry that was not clear from the discussion. I think it would
be best to do this as an augmentation to what is already merged in.
---
If your project is set
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3124#issuecomment-68410362
Ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3103#issuecomment-68410347
Ping
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3836#issuecomment-68410039
[Test build #24909 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24909/consoleFull)
for PR 3836 at commit
[`4e13133`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3836#issuecomment-68410041
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2634#issuecomment-68409940
@derrickburns I'm going to check the implementation during the break. Since
it is hard to locate the serialization issue, do you mind me making changes to
your implementat
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#issuecomment-68409631
[Test build #24915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24915/consoleFull)
for PR 3431 at commit
[`445b57b`](https://githu
Github user alexliu68 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3848#issuecomment-68409413
I rebase the commit to simply fixing the parsing issue and concatenate
cluster name, database name and table name into a single string with dot in
between. Now it can p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3840#issuecomment-68408981
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3840#issuecomment-68408974
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/24907/consoleFull)
for PR 3840 at commit
[`86bc5eb`](https://github.com/a
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#discussion_r22369162
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/PrunedScanSuite.scala ---
@@ -19,10 +19,11 @@ package org.apache.spark.sql.sources
impo
Github user scwf commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3431#discussion_r22369155
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/sources/ddl.scala ---
@@ -99,8 +209,15 @@ private[sql] case class CreateTableUsing(
sys.er
Github user scwf commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3718#issuecomment-68408513
@marmbrus, can this go since i have filed a PR to add pop-up for full job
desc?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appea
101 - 200 of 473 matches
Mail list logo
