Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4792#discussion_r25554933
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/parquet/newParquet.scala ---
@@ -483,16 +487,42 @@ private[sql] case class ParquetRelation2(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4827#issuecomment-76514362
[Test build #28118 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28118/consoleFull)
for PR 4827 at commit
GitHub user zhichao-li opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4828
[SPARK-6077] update listener for the existing streamingTab instead of
adding an one new one
Currently we would create a new streaming tab for each streamingContext
even if there's already one
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3425
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4770
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-76514804
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-76514803
[Test build #28115 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28115/consoleFull)
for PR 2765 at commit
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4829#issuecomment-76516159
This looks like a duplicate of #4120 /
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-5311, which we marked as Won't
Fix:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4792#issuecomment-76516146
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4792#issuecomment-76516145
[Test build #28117 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28117/consoleFull)
for PR 4792 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4799#issuecomment-76505992
Given the discussion on the bug it looks ok, but it's missing the
documentation that explains the behavior.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4822#issuecomment-76509136
That seems like the right way to do this thing. It mirrors similar
declarations for core, mllib, streaming, etc. Should `tests.py` be in here?
Maybe not worth bothering
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4824#issuecomment-76511778
[Test build #28109 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28109/consoleFull)
for PR 4824 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4824#issuecomment-76511782
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user yhuai opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4826
[SPARK-5950][SQL]Insert array into a metastore table saved as parquet
should work when using datasource api
This PR contains the following changes:
1. Add a new method,
Github user liyezhang556520 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3971#issuecomment-76515557
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3971#issuecomment-76515608
[Test build #28121 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28121/consoleFull)
for PR 3971 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#issuecomment-76515988
[Test build #28116 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28116/consoleFull)
for PR 4688 at commit
Github user chenghao-intel commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/3249#discussion_r25552386
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -422,6 +424,108 @@ class Analyzer(catalog:
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25552048
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -217,53 +219,60 @@ private[spark] object EventLoggingListener
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#issuecomment-76502888
[Test build #28102 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28102/consoleFull)
for PR 4821 at commit
Github user andrewor14 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4821#discussion_r25552069
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -202,11 +204,11 @@ private[spark] object EventLoggingListener
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4825#issuecomment-76512123
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4827
[SPARK-6076][Block Manager] Fix a potential OOM issue when StorageLevel is
MEMORY_AND_DISK_SER
In
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-76514746
[Test build #28114 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28114/consoleFull)
for PR 2765 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4829#issuecomment-76514752
[Test build #28120 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28120/consoleFull)
for PR 4829 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#issuecomment-76514748
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user mridulm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4818#issuecomment-76515153
@sryza When cpu scheduling is enabled (ref @tgravescs comment here and in
jira) it must be validated.
Just as we validate memory and while prioritizing based on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4729#issuecomment-76403689
[Test build #28070 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28070/consoleFull)
for PR 4729 at commit
Github user pierre-borckmans commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2354#issuecomment-76424493
Why was this deleted?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4525#issuecomment-76431586
[Test build #28071 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28071/consoleFull)
for PR 4525 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4808#issuecomment-76424926
[Test build #28072 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28072/consoleFull)
for PR 4808 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4810#issuecomment-76425916
[QA tests have
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28073/consoleFull)
for PR 4810 at commit
Github user jkleckner commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4780#issuecomment-76428126
Are you packaging CA yourself, are you marking all the Spark deps as
provided? I see you're already using the ```userClassPathFirst``` settings.
Cases of
Github user jerryshao closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4154
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-76428527
[Test build #28075 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28075/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4525#issuecomment-76431601
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4712#issuecomment-76422284
@marmbrus do you have time to take a look of this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4802#issuecomment-76427925
Mind maybe copying some of the description from the other PR into this one
so that the commit message is useful?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4712#issuecomment-76423117
Not until after the 1.3 release.
On Feb 27, 2015 8:24 AM, Liang-Chi Hsieh notificati...@github.com wrote:
@marmbrus https://github.com/marmbrus do you have
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4154#issuecomment-76423609
OK, I will close this PR, thanks a lot for your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4809#issuecomment-76425978
[Test build #28074 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28074/consoleFull)
for PR 4809 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4765#issuecomment-76393975
Going once going twice... I'd love to hear a slightly tidier way to handle
this across the board, although, the code is just 3 lines duplicated in 3 clear
places, so not
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r25502732
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/java/JavaStreamingContext.scala
---
@@ -279,13 +289,14 @@ class JavaStreamingContext(val
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r25502749
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/api/java/JavaStreamingContext.scala
---
@@ -309,12 +321,13 @@ class JavaStreamingContext(val
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4777#issuecomment-76387284
[Test build #28068 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28068/consoleFull)
for PR 4777 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r25502765
--- Diff: project/MimaExcludes.scala ---
@@ -83,7 +83,16 @@ object MimaExcludes {
// SPARK-2757
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r25502811
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/context.py ---
@@ -260,6 +260,12 @@ def textFileStream(self, directory):
return
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4777#issuecomment-76386914
[Test build #28066 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28066/consoleFull)
for PR 4777 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4777#issuecomment-76386919
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4525#issuecomment-76391561
[Test build #28069 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28069/consoleFull)
for PR 4525 at commit
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4224#issuecomment-76396713
I backported this to 1.2
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4525#issuecomment-76398152
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4525#issuecomment-76398141
[Test build #28069 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28069/consoleFull)
for PR 4525 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/2765#discussion_r25502824
--- Diff: python/pyspark/streaming/tests.py ---
@@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ def test_queue_stream(self):
def test_text_file_stream(self):
d =
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4777#issuecomment-76387038
Jenkins, retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4814#issuecomment-76388516
I'm going to merge into master only just because it's not clear there is an
actual practical issue as a result of this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4813#issuecomment-76390382
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4813#issuecomment-76390375
[Test build #28067 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28067/consoleFull)
for PR 4813 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4813
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4777#issuecomment-76396234
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4777#issuecomment-76396222
[Test build #28068 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28068/consoleFull)
for PR 4777 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4814
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4213#issuecomment-76402017
Since the commit this depends on was in 1.2
(https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1f8b7186813643afdb592131bfd89228ef971e74)
and this was tagged for back-port into 1.2,
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4810#issuecomment-76441586
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-76441577
[Test build #28076 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28076/consoleFull)
for PR 4632 at commit
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4758#discussion_r25526262
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/HiveThriftServer2Suites.scala
---
@@ -315,7 +315,14 @@ abstract
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4758#issuecomment-76444830
Updated, you can merge it after Jenkins nods :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4815#issuecomment-76445667
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4808#issuecomment-76445822
[Test build #28079 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28079/consoleFull)
for PR 4808 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25527424
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -256,6 +256,12 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4816#issuecomment-76448297
[Test build #28080 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28080/consoleFull)
for PR 4816 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25525230
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -313,6 +320,21 @@ private[spark] class Client(
env(SPARK_YARN_MODE)
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25526051
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ClientArguments.scala ---
@@ -222,6 +224,14 @@ private[spark] class ClientArguments(args:
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25526204
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -256,6 +256,12 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4809#issuecomment-7613
[Test build #28074 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28074/consoleFull)
for PR 4809 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25526105
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/ApplicationMaster.scala ---
@@ -256,6 +256,12 @@ private[spark] class ApplicationMaster(
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25526585
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +561,29 @@ private[spark] class Client(
amContainer
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4810#issuecomment-76441573
[QA tests have
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28073/consoleFull)
for PR 4810 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4809#issuecomment-7626
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user ryan-williams commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4632#issuecomment-76444840
This one is ready for review, I think
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user msjgriffiths opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4815
SPARK-6063
Remove unicode characters from MLlib file.
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by running:
$ git pull https://github.com/msjgriffiths/spark SPARK-6063
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25527152
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +93,102 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends
GitHub user jkbradley opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4816
[SPARK-4587] [mllib] [docs] Fixed save,load calls in ML guide examples
Should pass spark context to save/load
CC: @mengxr
You can merge this pull request into a Git repository by
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4816#issuecomment-76450030
[Test build #28081 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28081/consoleFull)
for PR 4816 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4808#issuecomment-76440483
[Test build #28072 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28072/consoleFull)
for PR 4808 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-76443797
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4087#issuecomment-76443789
[Test build #28075 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28075/consoleFull)
for PR 4087 at commit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25525993
--- Diff:
yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnSparkHadoopUtil.scala ---
@@ -82,6 +93,102 @@ class YarnSparkHadoopUtil extends SparkHadoopUtil
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4758#issuecomment-76444880
[Test build #28077 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28077/consoleFull)
for PR 4758 at commit
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25526812
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -866,23 +910,11 @@ object Client extends Logging {
* Get the list of
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4808#issuecomment-76440495
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25525865
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -313,6 +320,21 @@ private[spark] class Client(
env(SPARK_YARN_MODE)
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4811#issuecomment-76446225
I messed up not passing sc to save/load. Is this patch going into 1.3? If
not, then I'll submit a separate patch fixing the documentation (which will
conflict a
Github user kayousterhout commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4777#issuecomment-76448316
I don't think it's worth it to return a 404, and this is more consistent
with how we treat stages/jobs that don't exist. I might say No running
application with
Github user pwendell commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4815#issuecomment-76450569
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4688#discussion_r25526548
--- Diff: yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/Client.scala ---
@@ -540,6 +561,29 @@ private[spark] class Client(
amContainer
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4805#issuecomment-76444874
[Test build #28078 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28078/consoleFull)
for PR 4805 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4525#issuecomment-76416431
[Test build #28071 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/28071/consoleFull)
for PR 4525 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/4729#issuecomment-76420679
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
101 - 200 of 428 matches
Mail list logo
