Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113718050
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113718007
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113718122
[Test build #35359 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35359/consoleFull)
for PR 6911 at commit
[`180b49d`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6899#issuecomment-113718198
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6899#issuecomment-113718188
[Test build #35354 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35354/console)
for PR 6899 at commit
[`4f4ea79`](https://github.
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6821#issuecomment-113718211
@jkbradley Could you review it when you have time? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113720758
[Test build #35357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35357/console)
for PR 6911 at commit
[`22e4c0a`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113720790
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113722728
[Test build #943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/943/consoleFull)
for PR 6911 at commit
[`180b49d`](https://githu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6917#issuecomment-113722910
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6917#issuecomment-113722822
[Test build #35356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35356/console)
for PR 6917 at commit
[`9bb1f19`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6866#issuecomment-113726022
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6866#issuecomment-113725948
[Test build #35355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35355/console)
for PR 6866 at commit
[`75de450`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113726353
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#discussion_r32883234
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/unsafe/UnsafeShuffleWriter.java ---
@@ -139,17 +139,22 @@ public void write(Iterator> records)
throws
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#discussion_r32883231
--- Diff:
core/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/shuffle/unsafe/UnsafeShuffleWriterSuite.java
---
@@ -253,6 +253,23 @@ public void
doNotNeedToCallWriteBefore
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113727278
[Test build #35360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35360/consoleFull)
for PR 6918 at commit
[`e503b8c`](https://gith
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113727568
Thanks for fixing this; the test looks good to me, but I think we might
want to preserve the old behavior of also performing error cleanup when
Throwables are thrown (
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113727924
Sounds like a good plan.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6866#issuecomment-113727956
Yay, this still passes tests! I've updated this to move the test build
profile selection logic into the module system, which I think makes things a
bit easier to unde
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113728195
@lianhuiwang Yeah, thanks for reminding. We are also working on this issue.
It will be addressed in another PR. At first, appending jobs with output
committers like `D
Github user holdenk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113728593
Would it not make more sense to just catch/rethrow throwables? (That way if
fail during cleanup we can pass back an exception indicating that cleanup
failed + the underl
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113729847
With the help from @yhuai, finally found the root cause of the
`OrcSourceSuite` failures showed in previous Jenkins builds. [SPARK-8501] [1]
is opened to track that is
Github user kopiczko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5375#issuecomment-113729967
Sorry guys, I currently have no time to work on it. @tdas: Would you mind
give a reference how this is solved?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to t
Github user kopiczko closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5375
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user kopiczko commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5375#issuecomment-113730010
Sorry guys, I currently have no time to work on it. @tdas: Would you mind
giving a reference how this is solved?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113730019
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113730026
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113730049
[Test build #35361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35361/consoleFull)
for PR 6864 at commit
[`d412de7`](https://gith
Github user dreamquster commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5358#discussion_r32883400
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -171,6 +172,10 @@ object ColumnPruning extends Rule[
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113732611
[Test build #35358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35358/console)
for PR 6849 at commit
[`5a94db0`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113732682
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user dreamquster commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/5358#discussion_r32883442
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/Generate.scala ---
@@ -56,7 +56,8 @@ case class Generate(
val boundGenerator = Bin
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113733710
[Test build #35359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35359/console)
for PR 6911 at commit
[`180b49d`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113733769
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113734145
I think that my concern was that wrapping a Throwable with a cause and
re-throwing it might not be safe in general because catchers higher up the
stack would then rece
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113735514
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6864#issuecomment-113735490
[Test build #35361 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35361/console)
for PR 6864 at commit
[`d412de7`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113737386
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6918#issuecomment-113737379
[Test build #35360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35360/console)
for PR 6918 at commit
[`e503b8c`](https://github.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6911#issuecomment-113737426
[Test build #943 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/943/console)
for PR 6911 at commit
[`180b49d`](https://github.c
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113746495
@tdas I'll see what I can do.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rtreffer commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6796#issuecomment-113762279
Ok, I think I'm slowly getting down to the cause
strictTypeChecking on
https://github.com/Parquet/parquet-mr/blob/master/parquet-column/src/main/java/parquet/io/
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113768928
@tdas
Here is the before:
And, here is the after:
---
If
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6874#discussion_r32884753
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -79,3 +80,60 @@ case class CreateStruct(children:
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#discussion_r32884758
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/codegen/GenerateProjection.scala
---
@@ -127,6 +127,7 @@ object GeneratePro
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6876#discussion_r32884828
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/InternalRow.scala ---
@@ -26,7 +26,67 @@ import
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressio
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6782#discussion_r32884906
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to t
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6782#discussion_r32884919
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to t
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6782#issuecomment-113775652
`DateAdd` and `DateSub` are very similar , can we abstract some common
pattern to reduce code size?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
GitHub user dwmclary opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6919
Spark 7998 freq item api
Here's "a better frequent item API" which provides a DataFrame with each
ArrayBuffer expanded into a column. There's surely some improvement that could
be done here, but
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6919#issuecomment-113775941
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6782#discussion_r32884986
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/datetimeFunctions.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,176 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to t
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#discussion_r32885075
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/Decimal.scala ---
@@ -286,6 +288,9 @@ object Decimal {
/** Maximum number of decimal di
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6874#discussion_r32885149
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -79,3 +80,60 @@ case class CreateStruct(children:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#issuecomment-113777827
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#issuecomment-113777818
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#issuecomment-113777922
[Test build #35362 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35362/consoleFull)
for PR 6814 at commit
[`071a757`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113783361
Looks a lot of space on the right. Could you just move `#batches` above the
blue bar?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113783546
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113783549
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113783603
Do you mean above the axis?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user MechCoder commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113783694
@mengxr Could you review this? This should be the next one to go as I have
refactored the code.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113784078
[Test build #35363 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35363/consoleFull)
for PR 6849 at commit
[`19c0f25`](https://gith
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113785985
> Do you mean above the axis?
No. Still overlap. But `#batches` is on the top.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
GitHub user BenFradet opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6920
[SPARK-8478][SQL] Harmonize UDF-related code to use uniformly UDF instead
of Udf
Follow-up of #6902 for being coherent between ```Udf``` and ```UDF```
You can merge this pull request into a Git r
Github user zsxwing commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-113786084
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6920#issuecomment-113786269
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6920#issuecomment-113786271
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-113786270
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-113786276
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-113786330
[Test build #35365 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35365/consoleFull)
for PR 6830 at commit
[`01cbb3d`](https://gith
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6920#issuecomment-113786412
[Test build #35364 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35364/consoleFull)
for PR 6920 at commit
[`660b669`](https://gith
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113786509
Mmh, in this case I think we won't be able to see ```#batches``` written
since the contrast won't be high enough between gray and dark blue.
---
If your project is se
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6845#issuecomment-113786756
Maybe we should put the axis on the bottom and ```#batches``` under the
axis.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user yijieshen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6874#discussion_r32885914
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypes.scala
---
@@ -79,3 +80,59 @@ case class CreateStruct(children:
Github user koertkuipers commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6848#issuecomment-113789091
i see MiMa failed. what binary compatibility promise does spark make? all
minor versions are binary compatible?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#issuecomment-113789829
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6814#issuecomment-113789820
[Test build #35362 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35362/console)
for PR 6814 at commit
[`071a757`](https://github.
Github user yijieshen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6874#issuecomment-113790186
@cloud-fan @chenghao-intel, thanks for reviewing this. I've moved the
incorrect input test into `ExpressionTypeCheckingSuite` and also remove
unnecessary assertion fro
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6146#issuecomment-113790943
@marmbrus Although the code looks problematic, I mentioned on the JIRA that
I can't reproduce the problem. By more testing, I found that in your PR #5876
(https://github.
Github user viirya closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6146
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6791#discussion_r32886340
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -465,6 +465,36 @@ private[python] class PythonMLLibAPI extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113792708
[Test build #35363 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35363/console)
for PR 6849 at commit
[`19c0f25`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6849#issuecomment-113792716
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-113792976
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6830#issuecomment-113792966
[Test build #35365 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35365/console)
for PR 6830 at commit
[`01cbb3d`](https://github.
Github user yu-iskw commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6791#discussion_r32886481
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -465,6 +465,36 @@ private[python] class PythonMLLibAPI extends
S
GitHub user piaozhexiu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921
[SPARK-6910] [SQL] [WIP] Support for pushing predicates down to metastore
for partition pruning
@marmbrus per our email conversation, I am sending a PR that implements the
idea that I outlined i
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6920#issuecomment-113796491
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6921#issuecomment-113796132
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6920#issuecomment-113796348
[Test build #35364 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35364/console)
for PR 6920 at commit
[`660b669`](https://github.
GitHub user yu-iskw opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6922
[SPARK-8495][SparkR] Add a `.lintr` file to validate the SparkR files and
the `lint-r` script
Thank Shivaram Venkataraman for your support. This is a prototype script to
validate the R files.
You
Github user yu-iskw commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6922#issuecomment-113798277
@shivaram Could you review it when you have time? Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6922#issuecomment-113798530
Merged build started.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6922#issuecomment-113798471
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6922#issuecomment-113799275
[Test build #35366 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35366/consoleFull)
for PR 6922 at commit
[`8f94680`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6922#issuecomment-113799298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6922#issuecomment-113799295
[Test build #35366 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/35366/console)
for PR 6922 at commit
[`8f94680`](https://github.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/6278#issuecomment-113799722
Merged build triggered.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not h
1 - 100 of 227 matches
Mail list logo
