Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9807#issuecomment-169209718
**[Test build #48819 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48819/consoleFull)**
for PR 9807 at commit
[`e6ef361`](https://gith
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9807#discussion_r48924285
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/classification.py ---
@@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ class DecisionTreeClassifier(JavaEstimator,
HasFeaturesCol, HasLabelCol, HasPred
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10238#issuecomment-169209703
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10238#issuecomment-169209702
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10597#issuecomment-169209593
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10597#issuecomment-169209592
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48924160
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/bucket.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612#issuecomment-169209019
**[Test build #48816 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48816/consoleFull)**
for PR 10612 at commit
[`1f08d6e`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169208476
BTW given the size of the pull request, I think we can also merge it
provided that it has no structural problems, and then review feedback in
follow-up prs.
---
If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-169208308
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-169208309
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10608#issuecomment-169208080
**[Test build #48796 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48796/consoleFull)**
for PR 10608 at commit
[`623a929`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10238#issuecomment-169207941
Yeah, my own fault most probably.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612#issuecomment-169207716
I'll let this simmer for a few days to wait for new PRs that might have
violations to go in, and fix those... but at some point I'll get bored of
fixing things and proba
GitHub user vanzin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10612
[SPARK-3873] [build] Enable import ordering error checking.
Turn import ordering violations into build errors, plus a few adjustments
to account for how the checker behaves. I'm a little on the f
Github user WangTaoTheTonic commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10238#issuecomment-169207523
It seems conflicted :(
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-169206547
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10582
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-169206545
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10585#issuecomment-169206444
**[Test build #48803 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48803/consoleFull)**
for PR 10585 at commit
[`696f884`](https://g
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10582#issuecomment-169206265
Yay. Merging to avoid further conflicts.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10582#issuecomment-169206038
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10582#issuecomment-169206036
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10582#issuecomment-169205865
**[Test build #48800 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48800/consoleFull)**
for PR 10582 at commit
[`d589315`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10348#issuecomment-169205857
**[Test build #48813 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48813/consoleFull)**
for PR 10348 at commit
[`5063f5f`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169205658
Yay. I'm gonna merge this before I have to fix more conflicts...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48923378
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQl.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,969 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169205402
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169205403
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48923332
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystQl.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,969 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169205356
**[Test build #48811 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48811/consoleFull)**
for PR 9525 at commit
[`922028b`](https://git
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7089#discussion_r48923007
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -922,6 +922,15 @@ private[spark] object SparkSubmitUtils {
Github user JoshRosen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169204251
More comments would also be appreciated, since this is pretty confusing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#issuecomment-169204200
**[Test build #48812 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48812/consoleFull)**
for PR 10605 at commit
[`60edf13`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169204037
Does case-sensitivity config still work with the new parser?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169203949
@JoshRosen I'm merging this into master and 1.6 branch to unblock another
PR, will add @Nullable in that PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#discussion_r48922730
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -223,14 +227,9 @@ public void loadNext() {
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#issuecomment-169203354
@hvanhovell Here is the result after having a fast path for small partition:
```
+-++--+---+-+
| Size|Name
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48922609
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -451,6 +452,19 @@ private[spark] object SQLConf {
doc = "When true, we
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169202932
**[Test build #48811 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48811/consoleFull)**
for PR 9525 at commit
[`922028b`](https://gith
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169202224
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169202223
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user Wenpei commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10587#issuecomment-169202207
Thanks, @srowen I will try to add parameter explain to fold.
But for treeAggregate, it has comments like below to refer to Aggregate
function. I thought it's enough
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10589#discussion_r48922143
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10376#issuecomment-169200095
**[Test build #48809 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48809/consoleFull)**
for PR 10376 at commit
[`7837b06`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10498#discussion_r48921611
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/bucket.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Soft
Github user jerryshao commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10376#issuecomment-169198730
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169198126
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169198124
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10589#discussion_r48921242
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10578#issuecomment-169197671
**[Test build #48799 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48799/consoleFull)**
for PR 10578 at commit
[`c7bee0a`](https://g
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48921238
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -587,6 +586,13 @@ class Analyzer(
case
Github user rekhajoshm commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9525#issuecomment-169196705
Thanks @jkbradley might have missed it or thought it was under
discussion.updated.thanks
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have y
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169196126
**[Test build #48808 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48808/consoleFull)**
for PR 10609 at commit
[`0228eef`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#issuecomment-169196055
cc @cloud-fan can you take a look at this? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10593#discussion_r48920875
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/Benchmark.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,102 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) under one
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#discussion_r48920477
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -133,7 +133,7 @@ class GradientDescent private[spark] (priv
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#discussion_r48920506
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@ object GradientDescent extends Logging {
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#discussion_r48920464
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/optimization/GradientDescent.scala
---
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ class GradientDescent private[spark] (priv
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9667#issuecomment-169193588
I see. Adding this seems reasonable since some spark.ml algorithms depend
on these APIs. However, I want to avoid breaking the public optimization APIs
in spark.mlli
Github user maropu commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10523#issuecomment-169193276
@yhuai Yes, quoted tables in postgres are always case-sensitive. We need to
support case-insensitive table names? Table names in sparksql
(`DataFrame#registerTempTable`)
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10573
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10452#issuecomment-169192724
Thanks, merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not hav
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169191999
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169192001
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10609#issuecomment-169191880
**[Test build #48798 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48798/consoleFull)**
for PR 10609 at commit
[`7466a50`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48919495
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/unresolved.scala
---
@@ -129,23 +129,39 @@ object UnresolvedAttribute {
n
Github user JoshRosen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#discussion_r48919509
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeInMemorySorter.java
---
@@ -223,14 +227,9 @@ public void loadNext() {
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48919450
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -587,6 +586,13 @@ class Analyzer(
case
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48919389
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParseUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user hhbyyh closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9614
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user QiangCai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10562#issuecomment-169191091
I think I have resolved this problem.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10583#discussion_r48919353
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/parser/ParseUtils.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,163 @@
+/**
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user hhbyyh commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9614#issuecomment-169191098
OK. I'll close this. Thanks for helping review.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user thunterdb commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169190994
@robert-dodier thanks for your PR. Can you please fix the style issue?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#discussion_r48919311
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/util/MLUtils.scala ---
@@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ object MLUtils {
val indicesLength = indices.len
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169190664
**[Test build #2332 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2332/consoleFull)**
for PR 10611 at commit
[`8ae7d35`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169190431
**[Test build #2332 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2332/consoleFull)**
for PR 10611 at commit
[`8ae7d35`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#discussion_r48919100
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -221,3 +224,147 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children: Seq[
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#discussion_r48918992
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -221,3 +224,147 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children: Seq[
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10527#discussion_r48918891
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/misc.scala
---
@@ -221,3 +224,147 @@ case class Murmur3Hash(children: Seq[
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169189182
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/4
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169189178
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169187517
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169187512
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169187255
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10606#issuecomment-169187237
**[Test build #48793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48793/consoleFull)**
for PR 10606 at commit
[`ea9f019`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169187257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10610#issuecomment-169187125
**[Test build #48802 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48802/consoleFull)**
for PR 10610 at commit
[`1f85561`](https://g
Github user liancheng commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10541#issuecomment-169186628
Tests finally pass! (The last build failure was actually triggered by an
older commit.)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10605#issuecomment-169186092
**[Test build #48806 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48806/consoleFull)**
for PR 10605 at commit
[`f464cf6`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611#issuecomment-169185779
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#issuecomment-16918
Thanks @somideshmukh! Could you please look the corrections from
@vijaykiran and me, extend the descriptions to the 100 character limit, and add
the parameter desc
GitHub user robert-dodier opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10611
[SPARK-12663] [MLlib] More informative error message in
MLUtils.loadLibSVMFile
This PR contains 1 commit which resolves
[SPARK-12663](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-12663).
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/10602#discussion_r48917505
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/fpm.py ---
@@ -68,11 +68,14 @@ def train(cls, data, minSupport=0.3, numPartitions=-1):
"""
Comput
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169183939
**[Test build #48805 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/48805/consoleFull)**
for PR 9581 at commit
[`526d64f`](https://git
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9581#issuecomment-169183941
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
201 - 300 of 841 matches
Mail list logo
