GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634
[SPARK-14869][SQL] Don't mask exceptions in ResolveRelations
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In order to support SPARK-11197 (run SQL directly on files), we added some
code in
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#issuecomment-213677565
**[Test build #56784 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56784/consoleFull)**
for PR 12402 at commit
[`16d94f4`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#issuecomment-213677716
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213677747
cc @davies / @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#issuecomment-213677711
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213678085
**[Test build #56787 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56787/consoleFull)**
for PR 12634 at commit
[`43cc738`](https://gi
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12628#issuecomment-213678404
can you add a test case?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have thi
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213678447
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled a
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-213678602
**[Test build #56781 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56781/consoleFull)**
for PR 12618 at commit
[`bfe536e`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-213678647
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12618#issuecomment-213678648
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12631#issuecomment-213678652
**[Test build #56780 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56780/consoleFull)**
for PR 12631 at commit
[`56355fa`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12631#issuecomment-213678704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12631#issuecomment-213678703
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213679029
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213679008
**[Test build #56787 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56787/consoleFull)**
for PR 12634 at commit
[`43cc738`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213679032
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213679503
**[Test build #2860 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2860/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213679584
**[Test build #2861 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2861/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213679617
**[Test build #2862 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2862/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://g
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12621#issuecomment-213679816
Merging in master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12621
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213680468
**[Test build #56788 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56788/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213681560
**[Test build #56790 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56790/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
[`7b58c5c`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213681559
**[Test build #56789 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56789/consoleFull)**
for PR 12634 at commit
[`a1980dc`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213681615
**[Test build #56782 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56782/consoleFull)**
for PR 12568 at commit
[`3690c7c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213681727
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213681724
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12626#discussion_r60824742
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ object CurrentOrigin {
}
}
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213683704
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213683674
**[Test build #56790 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56790/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
[`7b58c5c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213683707
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12347#issuecomment-213683729
Yea the current tests are pretty scattered and they are way too big to
merge into a single one. Can you just close this pull request? Thanks.
---
If your project is set
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12635
[SPARK-14871][SQL] Disable StatsReportListener to declutter output
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark SQL inherited from Shark to use the StatsReportListener.
Unfortunately
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12635#issuecomment-213686652
**[Test build #56791 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56791/consoleFull)**
for PR 12635 at commit
[`18a7097`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213688248
**[Test build #56792 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56792/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
[`ccd6ca0`](https://gi
GitHub user rxin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12636
[SPARK-14872][SQL] Restructure command package
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This patch restructures sql.execution.command package to break the commands
into multiple files,
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12636#issuecomment-213688570
cc @andrewor14 sorry for creating a lot of conflicts with your patch. I
promise I will stop moving stuff around after this patch!
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12636#issuecomment-213688960
**[Test build #56793 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56793/consoleFull)**
for PR 12636 at commit
[`9bbe693`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12635#issuecomment-213689297
**[Test build #56791 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56791/consoleFull)**
for PR 12635 at commit
[`18a7097`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12635#issuecomment-213689311
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12635#issuecomment-213689309
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12632#issuecomment-213690810
**[Test build #56783 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56783/consoleFull)**
for PR 12632 at commit
[`d20e167`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12632#issuecomment-213690843
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213690865
**[Test build #56785 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56785/consoleFull)**
for PR 12633 at commit
[`2d4ddc8`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12632#issuecomment-213690841
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213690917
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213690916
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213691712
**[Test build #2862 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2862/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213692318
**[Test build #56794 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56794/consoleFull)**
for PR 12568 at commit
[`ca46f4c`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213692383
**[Test build #2860 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2860/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213692659
**[Test build #56786 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56786/consoleFull)**
for PR 12633 at commit
[`9892ab5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213692704
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12633#issuecomment-213692703
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213693621
**[Test build #56788 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56788/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213693704
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213693705
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12565#issuecomment-213693798
**[Test build #2861 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2861/consoleFull)**
for PR 12565 at commit
[`a114466`](https://
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574#discussion_r60825392
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/recommendation/MatrixFactorizationModel.scala
---
@@ -261,58 +261,93 @@ object MatrixFactorizationModel
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574#discussion_r60825409
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/recommendation/MatrixFactorizationModel.scala
---
@@ -261,58 +261,93 @@ object MatrixFactorizationModel
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574#discussion_r60825440
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -218,11 +292,135 @@ class ALSModel private[ml] (
predict(userF
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213694843
**[Test build #56789 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56789/consoleFull)**
for PR 12634 at commit
[`a1980dc`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213694868
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213694869
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213696139
**[Test build #56795 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56795/consoleFull)**
for PR 12416 at commit
[`714afac`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213698709
**[Test build #56796 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56796/consoleFull)**
for PR 12416 at commit
[`1da5e91`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12631#issuecomment-213699239
Yes, on a system with Maven < 3.3.9 installed, you always have to pass
`--force`. This would at least make it optional on the second or subsequent
run.
Ideally
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213700473
**[Test build #56795 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56795/consoleFull)**
for PR 12416 at commit
[`714afac`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213700491
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213700495
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12636#issuecomment-213703028
**[Test build #56793 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56793/consoleFull)**
for PR 12636 at commit
[`9bbe693`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12636#issuecomment-213703073
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12636#issuecomment-213703072
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213704837
**[Test build #56792 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56792/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
[`ccd6ca0`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213704897
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-213704898
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
GitHub user srowen opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637
[SPARK-14873] [CORE] Java sampleByKey methods take ju.Map but with Scala
Double values; results in type Object
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Java `sampleByKey` methods
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637#discussion_r60826170
--- Diff:
examples/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/examples/mllib/JavaStratifiedSamplingExample.java
---
@@ -37,22 +37,19 @@ public static void main(String[]
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637#issuecomment-213706212
**[Test build #56797 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56797/consoleFull)**
for PR 12637 at commit
[`0fe43b4`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#discussion_r60826409
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/CatalystConf.scala ---
@@ -32,6 +32,8 @@ trait CatalystConf {
def optimizerInSet
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12634#issuecomment-213707877
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enable
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12626#discussion_r60826489
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/trees/TreeNode.scala
---
@@ -71,7 +71,9 @@ object CurrentOrigin {
}
}
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213712873
**[Test build #56794 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56794/consoleFull)**
for PR 12568 at commit
[`ca46f4c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213713218
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-213713219
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12571#discussion_r60826861
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/SparkDeploySchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -66,12 +66,20 @@ private[spark] class SparkDeploySc
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213723024
**[Test build #56796 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56796/consoleFull)**
for PR 12416 at commit
[`1da5e91`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213723361
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213723359
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#discussion_r60827197
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -154,11 +172,12 @@ sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable {
* @p
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-213725055
This looks correct to my eyes. The Since annotation is in place as a
non-test class; the existing test classes are moved into the test source root.
The parent pom now de
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637#issuecomment-213725948
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637#issuecomment-213725950
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637#issuecomment-213725832
**[Test build #56797 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56797/consoleFull)**
for PR 12637 at commit
[`0fe43b4`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637#issuecomment-213726045
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user lw-lin opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12638
[SPARK-14874][SQL][Streaming] Cleanup the useless Batch class
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The `Batch` class, which had been used to indicate progress in a stream,
wa
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12638#issuecomment-213726229
**[Test build #56798 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56798/consoleFull)**
for PR 12638 at commit
[`c79cba9`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12637#issuecomment-213726228
**[Test build #56799 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56799/consoleFull)**
for PR 12637 at commit
[`0fe43b4`](https://gi
Github user pravingadakh commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#discussion_r60827833
--- Diff:
mllib-local/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/linalg/Matrices.scala ---
@@ -154,11 +172,12 @@ sealed trait Matrix extends Serializable {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12638#issuecomment-213739995
**[Test build #56798 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56798/consoleFull)**
for PR 12638 at commit
[`c79cba9`](https://g
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
