Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214574399
**[Test build #56945 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56945/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214574217
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214574264
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214574263
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214574215
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214574107
**[Test build #56939 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56939/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12668#issuecomment-214574085
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214574075
**[Test build #56931 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56931/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12668#issuecomment-214574083
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12668#issuecomment-214573986
**[Test build #56941 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56941/consoleFull)**
for PR 12668 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214573266
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214573268
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214573162
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214573161
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214573118
**[Test build #56932 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56932/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214572984
**[Test build #56937 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56937/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214572720
**[Test build #2876 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2876/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214572629
**[Test build #2877 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2877/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214572245
@davies and @srowen .
I opened a new PR #12677 to monitor `LZ4BlockInputStream.java` file
properly from now.
If we can monitor it, we had better do that.
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12677#issuecomment-214572176
**[Test build #56948 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56948/consoleFull)**
for PR 12677 at commit
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12677
[MINOR][BUILD] Enable RAT checking on `LZ4BlockInputStream.java`.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since `LZ4BlockInputStream.java` is not licensed to Apache
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12676#issuecomment-214570724
**[Test build #56947 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56947/consoleFull)**
for PR 12676 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12421#issuecomment-214570700
More test cases are added.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12676
[SPARK-14907][MLLIB] Use repartition in GLMRegressionModel.save
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR changes `GLMRegressionModel.save` function like the
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-214570155
Created a JIRA https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14906 to follow
this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-214569974
**[Test build #56946 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56946/consoleFull)**
for PR 12259 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12421#issuecomment-214569512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12421#issuecomment-214569510
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r61011875
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ private[sql] object
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12421#issuecomment-214569373
**[Test build #56935 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56935/consoleFull)**
for PR 12421 at commit
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675#issuecomment-214569241
@wangmiao1981 @jkbradley Please help review this PR
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-214569287
@dbtsai yea. Forget to do that. Updating now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675#issuecomment-214569200
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214569258
**[Test build #56945 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56945/consoleFull)**
for PR 12560 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214569093
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214569094
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214569026
**[Test build #56944 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56944/consoleFull)**
for PR 12673 at commit
GitHub user GayathriMurali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12675
[SPARK-14894][PySpark] Add result summary api to Gaussian Mixture
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add summary API to Gaussian Mixture
## How was this
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-214568575
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-214568577
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-214568396
**[Test build #56929 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56929/consoleFull)**
for PR 11919 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61010762
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -87,6 +87,84 @@ def stop(self):
self._jcq.stop()
+class
Github user rdblue commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-214566974
I noticed that there was a conflict so I rebased on master. Tests are still
passing.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-214566640
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-214566638
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12309#discussion_r61010207
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/PipedRDD.scala ---
@@ -144,7 +142,8 @@ private[spark] class PipedRDD[T: ClassTag](
new
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61010166
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -87,6 +87,84 @@ def stop(self):
self._jcq.stop()
+class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12239#issuecomment-214566372
**[Test build #56930 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56930/consoleFull)**
for PR 12239 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61010070
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -87,6 +87,84 @@ def stop(self):
self._jcq.stop()
+class
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61010024
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -87,6 +87,84 @@ def stop(self):
self._jcq.stop()
+class
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214566017
**[Test build #56944 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56944/consoleFull)**
for PR 12673 at commit
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61009830
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -87,6 +87,84 @@ def stop(self):
self._jcq.stop()
+class
Github user brkyvz commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61009792
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -87,6 +87,84 @@ def stop(self):
self._jcq.stop()
+class
Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#discussion_r61009404
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/streaming.py ---
@@ -87,6 +87,84 @@ def stop(self):
self._jcq.stop()
+class
Github user GayathriMurali commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12670#issuecomment-214565229
I am closing this PR as a file got added by mistake. Will open a new one.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user GayathriMurali closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12670
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214564726
**[Test build #56943 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56943/consoleFull)**
for PR 12673 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214564751
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214564753
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user olarayej commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#discussion_r61009021
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2469,6 +2469,110 @@ setMethod("drop",
base::drop(x)
})
+#' This function
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#discussion_r61008558
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2469,6 +2469,110 @@ setMethod("drop",
base::drop(x)
})
+#' This function
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#discussion_r61008598
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2469,6 +2469,110 @@ setMethod("drop",
base::drop(x)
})
+#' This function
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11569#discussion_r61008503
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/DataFrame.R ---
@@ -2469,6 +2469,110 @@ setMethod("drop",
base::drop(x)
})
+#' This function
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214562765
> OneVsRest with classifier in estimatorParamMaps of tuning fail to
persistence
Nice catch. Could you please create a JIRA and note this issue in the
Python
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-214562802
I think `override def pyUDT: String = "pyspark.mllib.linalg.MatrixUDT"` has
to be changed; otherwise, this will cause inconsistent result. Maybe this can
be removed
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12674#issuecomment-214562708
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214562752
**[Test build #56943 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56943/consoleFull)**
for PR 12673 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12674#issuecomment-214562749
**[Test build #56942 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56942/consoleFull)**
for PR 12674 at commit
Github user sameeragarwal commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12674#issuecomment-214562530
@rxin
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user sameeragarwal opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12674
[SPARK-14870][SQL][FOLLOW-UP] Move decimalDataWithNulls in
DataFrameAggregateSuite
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Minor followup to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214562347
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214562349
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214562249
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214562250
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214562189
**[Test build #56928 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56928/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user brkyvz commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214562057
cc @davies @marmbrus @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214562168
**[Test build #56936 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56936/consoleFull)**
for PR 12663 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12668#issuecomment-214561234
**[Test build #56941 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56941/consoleFull)**
for PR 12668 at commit
Github user dilipbiswal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1#discussion_r61006959
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -424,7 +424,7 @@ private[sql] object
Github user rxin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214560927
Merging in master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#discussion_r61006720
--- Diff: project/SparkBuild.scala ---
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ object BuildCommons {
core, graphx, mllib, mllibLocal, repl, networkCommon, networkShuffle,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214560608
**[Test build #56940 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56940/consoleFull)**
for PR 12593 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214560616
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214559266
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214560612
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214560392
**[Test build #56940 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56940/consoleFull)**
for PR 12593 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12416#issuecomment-214560261
@pravingadakh I think you need to update `dev/sparktestsupport/modules.py`
for Jenkins build as well. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12604#issuecomment-214559956
I'll take a look now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user felixcheung commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#issuecomment-214559789
@thunterdb re: roxygen2 doc - please add:
`@rdname spark.lapply`
`@return` for return type and value
`@export`
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214559440
**[Test build #56938 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56938/consoleFull)**
for PR 12673 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214559710
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214559577
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214559709
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214559455
Then, is it possible to remove `LZ4BlockInputStream.java` from
`dev/.rat-excludes` in this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214559574
**[Test build #56938 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56938/consoleFull)**
for PR 12673 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214559694
Updated, thanks! I'll do the Since annotation later
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12673#issuecomment-214559578
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12669#issuecomment-214559445
**[Test build #56939 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56939/consoleFull)**
for PR 12669 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214559276
Oh, thank you, @srowen . It really does.
```
spark:license_header$ git diff master --name-only
dev/.rat-excludes
spark:license_header$
201 - 300 of 786 matches
Mail list logo
