Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12542#issuecomment-214464015
@yanboliang Thanks!
Merging with master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pr
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214464159
**[Test build #56906 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56906/consoleFull)**
for PR 12593 at commit
[`3d310f2`](https://gi
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12542
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214465486
**[Test build #56907 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56907/consoleFull)**
for PR 12585 at commit
[`f59b869`](https://gi
Github user kevinyu98 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12646#issuecomment-214465479
Hello Dongjoon: Thanks for your comments, I will make changes.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574#discussion_r60959688
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -200,8 +240,42 @@ class ALSModel private[ml] (
@Since("1.3.0")
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#discussion_r60959821
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -126,16 +126,8 @@ final class GBTClassifier @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12579#issuecomment-214466180
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12574#discussion_r60960027
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -374,9 +599,26 @@ class ALS(@Since("1.4.0") override val uid: String)
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12579#issuecomment-214466178
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12579#issuecomment-214465973
**[Test build #56899 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56899/consoleFull)**
for PR 12579 at commit
[`13e9775`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214466313
**[Test build #2868 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2868/consoleFull)**
for PR 12585 at commit
[`f59b869`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214466387
**[Test build #2870 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2870/consoleFull)**
for PR 12585 at commit
[`f59b869`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214466355
**[Test build #2869 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2869/consoleFull)**
for PR 12585 at commit
[`f59b869`](https://g
Github user gatorsmile commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12662#issuecomment-214467967
@rxin @yhuai @hvanhovell
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
GitHub user mgummelt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12664
Fix dynamic allocation docs to address cached data.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Documentation changes
## How was this patch tested?
No tests
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12664#issuecomment-214469702
**[Test build #56908 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56908/consoleFull)**
for PR 12664 at commit
[`05a3f45`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-214469692
**[Test build #2871 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2871/consoleFull)**
for PR 12409 at commit
[`fc6a325`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214469708
**[Test build #56904 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56904/consoleFull)**
for PR 12663 at commit
[`94e206f`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214469877
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214469887
**[Test build #56902 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56902/consoleFull)**
for PR 12659 at commit
[`b87838b`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214469882
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214470077
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214470079
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214470548
it's because the github pull request builder generally sucks. :)
anyways, looking in to it now.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12409#issuecomment-214470777
**[Test build #2871 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2871/consoleFull)**
for PR 12409 at commit
[`fc6a325`](https://
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214470976
jenkins, test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not ha
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214471592
**[Test build #56906 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56906/consoleFull)**
for PR 12593 at commit
[`3d310f2`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12664#issuecomment-214471598
**[Test build #56908 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56908/consoleFull)**
for PR 12664 at commit
[`05a3f45`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214471646
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r60963521
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMean
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214471645
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12664#issuecomment-214471719
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12664#issuecomment-214471725
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user xwu0226 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12579#issuecomment-214472079
@liancheng Thanks for triggering the test! I am looking into the test
failure.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply a
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12664#issuecomment-214472099
OK by me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enab
Github user yinxusen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9430#issuecomment-214472349
I'll close this one according to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11128
for now
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
rep
Github user yinxusen closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9430
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214472422
**[Test build #56909 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56909/consoleFull)**
for PR 12493 at commit
[`8aaa91d`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12520#discussion_r60964326
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/PartitioningUtils.scala
---
@@ -441,7 +441,7 @@ private[sql] object Partitioning
Github user shaneknapp commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12493#issuecomment-214473135
i guess it just likes me more than you both. ;)
i'll triple-check the whitelist and see if something broke there. as
usual, there's nothing in the logs exc
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214474647
@MLnick Yanbo does not like the change of train() API. The new parameter is
optional, so the user of train should not be aware of this change. In addition,
I think
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214475204
**[Test build #56910 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56910/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
[`2c88b4e`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12625#issuecomment-214476630
**[Test build #56911 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56911/consoleFull)**
for PR 12625 at commit
[`521292e`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214478040
**[Test build #56912 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56912/consoleFull)**
for PR 12593 at commit
[`98f398c`](https://gi
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#discussion_r60967938
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/Classifier.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +65,76 @@ abstract class Classifier[
def setRawPredicti
GitHub user dongjoon-hyun opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665
[MINOR][DOCS] Update license header of LZ4BlockInputStream.java and remove
it from RAT exclusion list.
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
`LZ4BlockInputStream.java`
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#discussion_r60968178
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -656,13 +656,15 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Log
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12500#discussion_r60968226
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/util/MLTestingUtils.scala ---
@@ -47,14 +48,32 @@ object MLTestingUtils extends SparkFunSuite {
va
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214479554
**[Test build #56913 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56913/consoleFull)**
for PR 12665 at commit
[`879fda9`](https://gi
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214479711
Hi, @davies .
I made this PR to ask your opinion.
- Can we remove `LZ4BlockInputStream.java` from RAT exclusion file like
other files?
- Can we remove
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#discussion_r60969068
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/GBTClassifier.scala ---
@@ -126,16 +126,8 @@ final class GBTClassifier @Since("1.4.0") (
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#discussion_r60969026
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/Classifier.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +65,76 @@ abstract class Classifier[
def setRawPredicti
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12662#issuecomment-214481012
LGTM Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12500#issuecomment-214481330
@BenFradet just one more minor style comment, then I think this is ready to
merge.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user shivaram commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#issuecomment-214481734
FWIW the error from Jenkins is `Error in namespaceExport(ns, exports) :
undefined exports: sparkLapply`
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12521#discussion_r60969585
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/streaming/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -368,4 +368,79 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12662#issuecomment-214481742
Just a note. The test in that file is
```
create table test (a int) stored as inputformat
'org.apache.hadoop.hive.ql.io.RCFileInputFormat' outputformat
'org.apac
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#discussion_r60969566
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALS.scala
---
@@ -656,13 +656,15 @@ object ALS extends DefaultParamsReadable[ALS] with
Logg
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12662
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12521#issuecomment-214482001
/cc @tdas
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12498#issuecomment-214482165
This LGTM.
We'll still need to update the pyspark.mllib implementation. @yanboliang
I'll merge this with master, but could you please do that in a follow-up PR?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11919#issuecomment-214482289
**[Test build #56915 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56915/consoleFull)**
for PR 11919 at commit
[`e980596`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214482287
**[Test build #56914 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56914/consoleFull)**
for PR 12663 at commit
[`657faef`](https://gi
GitHub user sbcd90 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12666
[SPARK-14889][Spark Core] scala.MatchError: NONE (of class
scala.Enumeration) when spark.scheduler.mode=NONE
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Handling exception for the b
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214483662
This PR contains only comment updates and moves, and RAT check is passed.
```
R
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12498
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12666#issuecomment-214484848
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12498#issuecomment-214485807
Update after speaking with @mengxr
Since we're breaking behavior anyways with with PR, perhaps we should try
to enforce good practice by:
* Removing "native"
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12498#issuecomment-214486402
Here it is: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-14899
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#discussion_r60971154
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalog.scala
---
@@ -622,40 +620,44 @@ class SessionCatalog(
* bas
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#discussion_r60971502
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/Classifier.scala ---
@@ -62,6 +65,76 @@ abstract class Classifier[
def setRawPredi
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12659#issuecomment-214488360
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12560#issuecomment-214490075
@wangmiao1981 I tend to agree with @yanboliang. I don't think adding
instrumentation is critical enough to break the `train` method signature, even
if it is `DeveloperAp
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568#issuecomment-214492945
LGTM. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user BenFradet commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12500#issuecomment-214493135
@MLnick will do
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214493425
**[Test build #56905 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56905/consoleFull)**
for PR 12589 at commit
[`e69d7cf`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214493611
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12568
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12589#issuecomment-214493617
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214493865
I'll wait to update this until your reviews are done. Thanks for taking a
look!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214494351
**[Test build #56912 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56912/consoleFull)**
for PR 12593 at commit
[`98f398c`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214494500
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12593#issuecomment-214494498
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12596#discussion_r60974980
--- Diff: python/pyspark/mllib/classification.py ---
@@ -312,6 +313,10 @@ def train(cls, data, iterations=100, step=1.0,
miniBatchFraction=1.0,
Github user jkbradley commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12596#issuecomment-214495321
Thanks for the PR. This should also include:
* LassoWithSGD (recommend using LinearRegression with elasticNetParam = 1.0)
* RidgeRegressionWithSGD (recommend u
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12402#discussion_r60975535
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/clustering.py ---
@@ -22,7 +22,151 @@
from pyspark.mllib.common import inherit_doc
__all__ = ['BisectingKMeans',
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214496772
**[Test build #56914 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56914/consoleFull)**
for PR 12663 at commit
[`657faef`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214496922
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12663#issuecomment-214496921
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214497498
**[Test build #2868 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2868/consoleFull)**
for PR 12585 at commit
[`f59b869`](https://
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12500#issuecomment-214498270
**[Test build #56916 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56916/consoleFull)**
for PR 12500 at commit
[`6c66068`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214498735
**[Test build #56907 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/56907/consoleFull)**
for PR 12585 at commit
[`f59b869`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214499333
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12585#issuecomment-214499329
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#discussion_r60977638
--- Diff: R/pkg/NAMESPACE ---
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@ export("as.DataFrame",
"read.json",
"read.parquet",
"read.text",
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#discussion_r60977738
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/context.R ---
@@ -226,6 +226,47 @@ setCheckpointDir <- function(sc, dirName) {
invisible(callJMethod(sc, "setCheckpointDir",
s
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12426#discussion_r60977845
--- Diff: R/pkg/inst/tests/testthat/test_context.R ---
@@ -141,3 +141,8 @@ test_that("sparkJars sparkPackages as comma-separated
strings", {
exp
Github user Mpn177 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12664#issuecomment-214501325
Don't see any problems with this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does no
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12665#issuecomment-214502099
LZ4BlockInputStream.java is NOT licensed to Apache Software Foundation
(ASF), even it's licensed under Apache License.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
201 - 300 of 799 matches
Mail list logo
