Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12612#discussion_r61414486
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/NewAccumulator.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,391 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foundation (ASF) unde
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12598#issuecomment-215399829
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12598#issuecomment-215399831
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12598#issuecomment-215399590
**[Test build #57242 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57242/consoleFull)**
for PR 12598 at commit
[`72785fe`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215399547
**[Test build #57249 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57249/consoleFull)**
for PR 12464 at commit
[`51b412f`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215398781
**[Test build #57248 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57248/consoleFull)**
for PR 12464 at commit
[`cfe6a66`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215398656
**[Test build #57248 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57248/consoleFull)**
for PR 12464 at commit
[`cfe6a66`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215398789
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12464#issuecomment-215398785
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215393510
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215393512
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215393363
**[Test build #57240 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57240/consoleFull)**
for PR 12341 at commit
[`ac02b51`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215392196
**[Test build #57247 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57247/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`9ef9a51`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215389944
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215389945
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215389914
**[Test build #57244 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57244/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
[`d5c5689`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215389458
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215389461
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215389452
**[Test build #57246 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57246/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`8863991`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215388708
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215388671
**[Test build #57243 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57243/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
[`d4ffc6a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215388707
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215388583
**[Test build #57246 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57246/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`8863991`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12753#issuecomment-215386512
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
GitHub user devaraj-kavali opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12753
[SPARK-3767] [CORE] Support wildcard in Spark properties
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added provision to specify the 'spark.executor.extraJavaOptions' value in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215386110
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215386113
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215385743
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215385781
**[Test build #57239 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57239/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`f6964f9`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215385737
**[Test build #57245 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57245/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`df5e917`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215385742
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215385539
**[Test build #57245 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57245/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`df5e917`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215379968
**[Test build #57244 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57244/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
[`d5c5689`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12066#issuecomment-215379043
**[Test build #57243 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57243/consoleFull)**
for PR 12066 at commit
[`d4ffc6a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215374433
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215374404
**[Test build #57241 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57241/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`d445022`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215374427
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#discussion_r61401723
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/types/UDTRegistration.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,133 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwar
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215372214
**[Test build #57241 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57241/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`d445022`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12598#issuecomment-215372240
**[Test build #57242 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57242/consoleFull)**
for PR 12598 at commit
[`72785fe`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12598#issuecomment-215371295
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215370955
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215370951
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215370706
**[Test build #57237 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57237/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`a7b7694`](https://g
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12695#issuecomment-215369309
Isn't the URI just `file:///D:/test`?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project doe
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61399541
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/UDTSerializationBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215367423
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215367301
**[Test build #57238 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57238/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`9584026`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215367425
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215366802
**[Test build #57240 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57240/consoleFull)**
for PR 12341 at commit
[`ac02b51`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215366426
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215366419
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215366183
**[Test build #57233 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57233/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
[`e61aa8a`](https://g
Github user kiszk commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11956#issuecomment-215365815
ping @davies
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12528#issuecomment-215365706
Thanks @shearerp but can you also very briefly mention how to invoke
`jupyter` in the programming guide? just a sentence would suffice, so that
people are clear this is
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12341#issuecomment-215365299
Jenkins retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#discussion_r61397728
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -195,10 +195,13 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <: NewI
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61397517
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/UDTSerializationBenchmark.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12747#issuecomment-215363871
You can also remove the one in `ANNGradient` right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215363656
**[Test build #57239 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57239/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`f6964f9`](https://gi
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12419#discussion_r61395945
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/linalg/distributed/RowMatrix.scala
---
@@ -379,15 +379,21 @@ class RowMatrix @Since("1.0.0") (
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207#issuecomment-215359267
If the base change is just bringing the `PMMLExportable` trait to ML in a
reasonable form, that seems fine. I might not know enough to know if I'm
missing something, but
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12707#issuecomment-215357914
Yeah, the problem is that Java 8 has a much stricter javadoc tool. `@group`
isn't a valid javadoc tag, so when `ALSModel.scala` gets translated to Java to
javadoc it, it
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215357553
**[Test build #57238 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57238/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`9584026`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215357222
**[Test build #57236 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57236/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
[`ba8d1e5`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215357266
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215357267
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61393700
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -929,6 +932,50 @@ def test_apply_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected " + s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215355549
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215355548
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215355402
**[Test build #57235 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57235/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`530f037`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215355291
**[Test build #57237 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57237/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`a7b7694`](https://gi
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61392731
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(getFactors(model.user
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61392206
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(getFactors(model.user
Github user MLnick commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391861
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(getFactors(model.user
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9354#issuecomment-215353152
Yes, this PR should be closed. Per discussion in the JIRA, this just is too
much SPI to open up for not obvious gain. There may be much more modest
refactorings that coul
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215352568
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215352565
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215352327
**[Test build #57230 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57230/consoleFull)**
for PR 12640 at commit
[`f4d2cbb`](https://g
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391277
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/tests.py ---
@@ -929,6 +932,50 @@ def test_apply_binary_term_freqs(self):
": expected " + s
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391177
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(getFactors(model.user
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391003
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(getFactors(model.user
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61391033
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(getFactors(model.user
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#discussion_r61390984
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/recommendation/ALSSuite.scala ---
@@ -512,6 +514,55 @@ class ALSSuite
assert(getFactors(model.user
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215350745
**[Test build #57236 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57236/consoleFull)**
for PR 12752 at commit
[`ba8d1e5`](https://gi
Github user mwws commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752#issuecomment-215350461
@chenghao-intel
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
GitHub user mwws opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12752
[Spark-14976][Streaming] make StreamingContext.textFileStream support
wildcard
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
make StreamingContext.textFileStream support wildcard
like /h
Github user srowen commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12660#issuecomment-215350491
If it's just porting old API params to the new API, seems sensible. The
implementation looks sensible to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61389927
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy()
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#discussion_r61389700
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/UnsafeArrayData.java
---
@@ -336,4 +336,62 @@ public UnsafeArrayData copy()
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215347510
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215347507
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12746#issuecomment-215347337
**[Test build #57234 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57234/consoleFull)**
for PR 12746 at commit
[`e61aa8a`](https://g
Github user viirya commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-215346566
@mengxr @dbtsai Thanks for reviewing this!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12259#issuecomment-215345283
Merged into master. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12718#issuecomment-215344251
**[Test build #57235 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57235/consoleFull)**
for PR 12718 at commit
[`530f037`](https://gi
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12640#issuecomment-215343973
@cloud-fan Could you also update the benchmark?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#issuecomment-215342856
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12736#issuecomment-215342854
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
701 - 800 of 850 matches
Mail list logo
