Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62837/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
**[Test build #62837 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62837/consoleFull)**
for PR 13920 at commit
[`e3194bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
LGTM. Let's run the test again since this is a pretty old PR. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13620
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241
**[Test build #62845 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62845/consoleFull)**
for PR 14241 at commit
[`780fec5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/7
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
Thanks - merging in master/2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241#discussion_r72154191
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -275,62 +271,152 @@ private[sql] case class RowDataSourceScanExec(
Github user ericl commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14241#discussion_r72154195
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/ExistingRDD.scala ---
@@ -275,62 +271,152 @@ private[sql] case class RowDataSourceScanExec(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62836/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
**[Test build #62836 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62836/consoleFull)**
for PR 14174 at commit
[`5bd4bca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
**[Test build #62844 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62844/consoleFull)**
for PR 14351 at commit
[`4bff124`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user maropu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
@rxin could you check this before the v2.0 release?
An actual default seems to be `snappy`:
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLCon
GitHub user maropu opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14351
[SQL][DOC] Fix a default name for parquet compression
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This pr is to fix a wrong description for parquet default compression.
You can mer
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
Now that 2.0 is mostly ready to go out (with the new accumulator API) -
does maybe @squito have some cycles to look at this? I know @rxin is probably
pretty busy with the packaging but after 2.0 is
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14311
Weird, both `core/test-only *DistributedSuite*` and `repl/test-only
*ReplSuite*` pass locally for me (jdk-8). I'll look into it tomorrow when I
have access to my desktop.
---
If your project is set
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9524
Now that 2.0 is mostly out - does @dbtsai have some cycles to review it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
Now that 2.0 RC5 has passed - maybe it would be an OK time to revisit this?
I think it can also be an ok base for adding more formats if we need to.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can rep
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #62843 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62843/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`06f753e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72148282
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SQLTestUtils.scala ---
@@ -247,6 +248,46 @@ private[sql] trait SQLTestUtils
}
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72148009
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -269,19 +273,11 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
**[Test build #62842 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62842/consoleFull)**
for PR 14269 at commit
[`82feec4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/8
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14284#discussion_r72144974
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/WindowExec.scala ---
@@ -625,10 +643,12 @@ private[execution] final class
OffsetWindowFu
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
Removed unused import.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269
one minor issue with import otherwise changes LGTM.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
**[Test build #62841 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/consoleFull)**
for PR 14275 at commit
[`4a0af2e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14269#discussion_r72143443
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -19,6 +19,7 @@ package org.apache.spark.internal
import java
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
**[Test build #62841 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62841/consoleFull)**
for PR 14275 at commit
[`4a0af2e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
**[Test build #3190 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3190/consoleFull)**
for PR 14292 at commit
[`26138b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
**[Test build #62840 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/consoleFull)**
for PR 14275 at commit
[`44c50d4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
**[Test build #62840 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62840/consoleFull)**
for PR 14275 at commit
[`44c50d4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user mgummelt commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275#discussion_r72141303
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerBackendUtil.scala
---
@@ -105,16 +105,27 @@ private[mesos] object Meso
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
**[Test build #62838 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62838/consoleFull)**
for PR 14350 at commit
[`4c6dfbc`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
**[Test build #62839 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62839/consoleFull)**
for PR 14349 at commit
[`33978cb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14350
[SPARK-16715][Tests]Fix a potential ExprId conflict for
SubexpressionEliminationSuite."Semantic equals and hash"
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
SubexpressionEliminatio
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
This PR is a cleaner version for 14174:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If yo
Github user ooq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
Closing this now. Open another PR for cleaner commit history:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user ooq closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enable
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62832/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user ooq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14349
[SPARK-16524][SQL] Add RowBatch and RowBasedHashMapGenerator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR is the first step for the following feature:
For hash aggregati
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14132
**[Test build #62832 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62832/consoleFull)**
for PR 14132 at commit
[`d3df3fb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user thunterdb commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14298#discussion_r72137984
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/aggregate/PercentileApprox.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,456 @@
+/*
+ * Lic
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72137376
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -269,19 +273,11 @@ class StreamExecution(
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14348
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14309
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62831/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14309
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14309
**[Test build #62831 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62831/consoleFull)**
for PR 14309 at commit
[`0e47cfd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
GitHub user philipphoffmann opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14348
[SPARK-15271] [MESOS] Allow force pulling executor docker images
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## H
Github user philipphoffmann commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051
fixed the above issue and sent another request here: #14348
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project do
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
**[Test build #62837 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62837/consoleFull)**
for PR 13920 at commit
[`e3194bd`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13920
Jenkins, retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14174
**[Test build #62836 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62836/consoleFull)**
for PR 14174 at commit
[`5bd4bca`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14270#discussion_r72131840
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -103,4 +103,9 @@ package object config {
.stringConf
.ch
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14297#discussion_r72131816
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/views.scala ---
@@ -44,7 +50,11 @@ import
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.plans.lo
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051
Shoot, yeah PR builder tests passed, but that was 7 days ago. Sorry
@philipphoffmann can you try this one again after figuring out whatever caused
this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you ca
Github user piffall closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14345
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is en
Github user piffall commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14345
Ok. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14257
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051
This patch just broke the build:
```
[error]
/home/jenkins/workspace/spark-master-compile-maven-hadoop-2.2/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosCoarseGrain
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14257
**[Test build #62829 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62829/consoleFull)**
for PR 14257 at commit
[`6b3adbf`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14257
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62829/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
**[Test build #62835 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62835/consoleFull)**
for PR 14292 at commit
[`26138b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62835/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62834/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #62834 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62834/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`bfa39e8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62827/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13886
**[Test build #62827 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62827/consoleFull)**
for PR 13886 at commit
[`472896f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14194
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292
**[Test build #62835 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62835/consoleFull)**
for PR 14292 at commit
[`26138b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14194
Merged to master/2.0 to match original change
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14194
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62833/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14194
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14194
**[Test build #62833 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62833/consoleFull)**
for PR 14194 at commit
[`23af691`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14309#discussion_r72127680
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameSuite.scala
---
@@ -896,6 +896,19 @@ class DataFrameSuite extends QueryTest with
SharedS
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13571
**[Test build #62834 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62834/consoleFull)**
for PR 13571 at commit
[`bfa39e8`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72127350
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -91,18 +92,30 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T: ClassTag](spa
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72127293
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/StreamExecution.scala
---
@@ -269,19 +273,11 @@ class StreamExecution(
* bat
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14333
OK sounds good. So maybe we're back to this: for `bcNewCenters`, is it
really worth the overhead to track and destroy them? or just settle for
unpersisting within the loop? I could go either way, you
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14275
Looks like one more last comment, and needs a rebase after
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14307
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62828/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14307
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72126474
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/SQLTestUtils.scala ---
@@ -247,6 +248,46 @@ private[sql] trait SQLTestUtils
}
}
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14307
**[Test build #62828 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/62828/consoleFull)**
for PR 14307 at commit
[`be2085a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13051
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14345
So I'm tempted to say no to this API addition because once we want to do
things like this, we should really rely on an optimizer to push things
automatically, which is the point for SQL and the DataFra
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14257
cc @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72125645
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -91,18 +92,30 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T: ClassTag](spa
Github user tdas commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14292#discussion_r72125535
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/streaming/HDFSMetadataLog.scala
---
@@ -91,18 +92,30 @@ class HDFSMetadataLog[T: ClassTag](spa
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
301 - 400 of 689 matches
Mail list logo
