Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9207
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63086/
Test PASSed.
---
I
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r73047977
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ case class CreateDataSourc
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r73048087
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/test/DataFrameReaderWriterSuite.scala
---
@@ -449,6 +449,22 @@ class DataFrameReaderWriterSuite ex
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r73048108
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1457,6 +1457,59 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTes
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r73048060
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/createDataSourceTables.scala
---
@@ -236,6 +236,11 @@ case class CreateDataSourc
Github user vlad17 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443#discussion_r73048593
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrame.scala ---
@@ -745,6 +825,80 @@ class DataFrame private[sql](
}
/**
+
Github user vlad17 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443
There may be small bug introduced here. Please see my comment inline:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11443/files#diff-c3d0394b2fc08fb2842ff0362a5ac6c9R836
---
If your project is set up for
Github user ooq commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14176#discussion_r73050331
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -279,9 +280,15 @@ case class HashAggregateExec(
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
@felixcheung Let me check the code of launching the sparkR shell. Can you
point me the code?
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
re
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14442
**[Test build #63088 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63088/consoleFull)**
for PR 14442 at commit
[`f614781`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
Merged to master/2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r73051607
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1457,6 +1457,59 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends Quer
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14442
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63088/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14442
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14398
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14442
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the featur
Github user dongjoon-hyun closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
https://github.com/apache/spark/blob/master/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/Logging.scala#L138
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
repl
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14353
Close this for the better PR https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14439
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
**[Test build #63092 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63092/consoleFull)**
for PR 14384 at commit
[`d5433f6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63092/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
**[Test build #63093 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63093/consoleFull)**
for PR 14384 at commit
[`b376dfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14410#discussion_r73053436
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -1457,6 +1457,59 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTes
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14443
**[Test build #63091 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63091/consoleFull)**
for PR 14443 at commit
[`8b06b72`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14443
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63091/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14443
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14443
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14443
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user mengxr commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
test this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14441
**[Test build #63090 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63090/consoleFull)**
for PR 14441 at commit
[`0e0136a`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
**[Test build #63094 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63094/consoleFull)**
for PR 14384 at commit
[`b376dfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14441
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14441
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63090/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63093/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
**[Test build #63093 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63093/consoleFull)**
for PR 14384 at commit
[`b376dfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
GitHub user eyalfa opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
[SPARK-16839] [SQL] redundant aliases after cleanupAliases
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
a failing test, soon to add a proposed fix
## How was this patch tested?
Github user eyalfa commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
@cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/1
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user yinxusen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14212
@MLnick They serve different purpose. This one is for users who have built
their tools upon it. The `LatentDirichletAllocationExample` is for ML docs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
**[Test build #63095 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63095/consoleFull)**
for PR 14384 at commit
[`119e576`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14439
It will be good to summarize the behaviors of other systems in the
description. Let's also explain the behavioral change of this pr in the
description. So, others can understand its implication.
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14439#discussion_r73064350
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/TypeCoercion.scala
---
@@ -157,6 +145,26 @@ object TypeCoercion {
})
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14445
[SPARK-16320][SQL] Fix performance regression for parquet table with nested
fields
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
For non-partitioned parquet table with nested column
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63094/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
**[Test build #63094 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63094/consoleFull)**
for PR 14384 at commit
[`b376dfb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14442
LGTM
FYI, MySQL and PostgreSQL support NOW as a synonym of CURRENT_TIMESTAMP
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as wel
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14445
**[Test build #63096 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63096/consoleFull)**
for PR 14445 at commit
[`272fb81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
**[Test build #63095 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63095/consoleFull)**
for PR 14384 at commit
[`119e576`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14445
Maybe, we can correct the PR description and make it more accurate.
This PR avoids the extra memory copy when the vectorized parquet record
reader is not being used for reading a non-part
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14384
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63095/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user sameeragarwal commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14176#discussion_r73070005
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/HashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -279,9 +280,15 @@ case class HashAggregateEx
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14445
@gatorsmile Thanks! updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user nsyca commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14411
@hvanhovell,
First, my apologies for delaying the replies. I am travelling this week,
only getting spontaneous connections. Thank you for your explanation of the
implementation and the reason
GitHub user clockfly opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
[SPARK-16841][SQL] Improves the row level metrics performance when reading
Parquet table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
When reading from Parquet table, Spark updates
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434#discussion_r73073652
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/optimizer/Optimizer.scala
---
@@ -662,10 +662,6 @@ object NullPropagation extends Rule
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
**[Test build #63097 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63097/consoleFull)**
for PR 14446 at commit
[`1054b74`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
**[Test build #63098 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63098/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`a8e828f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157#discussion_r73074211
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/mesos/MesosSchedulerUtils.scala
---
@@ -356,4 +374,233 @@ private[mesos] trait MesosSchedule
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
**[Test build #63098 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63098/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`a8e828f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63098/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
**[Test build #63099 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63099/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`efc1d18`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14368#discussion_r73076628
--- Diff: examples/src/main/r/RSparkSQLExample.R ---
@@ -18,31 +18,43 @@
library(SparkR)
# $example on:init_session$
-sparkR.session(app
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14445
**[Test build #63096 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63096/consoleFull)**
for PR 14445 at commit
[`272fb81`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14445
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14445
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63096/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14433
@felixcheung I will try to retrieve terminal/shell type before printing out
the message. I will update the PR if I can find a way of doing that. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, y
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13647
ping @mengxr @jkbradley @yanboliang Can you give me some comments on this
PR? I can start improving it for 2.1+.
Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this em
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14392#discussion_r73079016
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib.R ---
@@ -632,3 +659,106 @@ setMethod("predict", signature(object =
"AFTSurvivalRegressionModel"),
function(object, n
Github user yhuai commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
Thanks. Merging to master.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
GitHub user keypointt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
[SPARK-16445][MLlib][SparkR] Multilayer Perceptron Classifier wrapper in
SparkR
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-16445
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14434
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #63100 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63100/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`04f7fed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
**[Test build #63100 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63100/consoleFull)**
for PR 14447 at commit
[`04f7fed`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63100/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14442
Can you add an end-to-end test for this in SQLQuerySuite? It's not a great
place but we will refactor it soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply ap
Github user keypointt commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14447
hi @mengxr , could you please tell me how to debug R wrapper? Thanks a lot
I tried to read documentation and google, but cannot figure it out myself.
From SparkR console, the error message
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13778
ping @cloud-fan again, this is waiting for a while. Do you have time to
look at again? Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
**[Test build #63097 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63097/consoleFull)**
for PR 14446 at commit
[`1054b74`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user WeichenXu123 closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14440
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user JoshRosen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14396
@zsxwing, I meant to describe what happens on executors in the following
scenario:
- `addFile(foo)` is called for the first time at `timestamp = 1`
- A task runs on an executor and dow
Github user WeichenXu123 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14440
sounds reasonable...
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63097/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
**[Test build #63099 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63099/consoleFull)**
for PR 11157 at commit
[`efc1d18`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11157
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63099/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user clockfly commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14446
**[Test build #63101 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63101/consoleFull)**
for PR 14446 at commit
[`1054b74`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
GitHub user junyangq opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14448
[Spark-16579][SparkR] Add install.spark function
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Add an `install.spark` function to the SparkR package. User can run
`install.spark()`
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14448
**[Test build #63102 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63102/consoleFull)**
for PR 14448 at commit
[`370cc5d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
Merging in branch-2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
@ericl can you close this?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user ericl closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is enab
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14427
Done
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
201 - 300 of 366 matches
Mail list logo
