Github user jodersky commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14359#discussion_r75361458
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/tree/impl/RandomForest.scala ---
@@ -161,31 +161,43 @@ private[spark] object RandomForest extends
GitHub user wangmiao1981 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14703
[SparkR][Example]change example APP name
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
For R SQL example, appname is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63994/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
I also created an umbrella JIRA for tracking follup items -
[SPARK-17133](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17133)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
**[Test build #63994 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63994/consoleFull)**
for PR 14623 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63996/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
**[Test build #63996 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63996/consoleFull)**
for PR 13796 at commit
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
I've been thinking some more about the metastore/file schema
reconciliation. As I mentioned in the PR description, this patch omits this
reconciliation. This causes failures when the parquet files
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14674
**[Test build #63997 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63997/consoleFull)**
for PR 14674 at commit
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14674
@srowen Thanks for your explanation. I misunderstood your previous comment.
Now, I addressed your comments.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14613
@felixcheung Let me think about your comments and I will get back soon.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user petermaxlee commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14697
@hvanhovell have time to take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
@viirya Had a quick look on this one, It seems that we are trying to make
the logical plans looks better, but does not help much for actual physical plan
or runtime. For example, for self join, the
Github user mallman commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
@cloud-fan Actually, all hive table partition metadata are retrieved for
every query analysis. This is then used to compare the new metadata with the
cached metadata. If they're the same, then we
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14690
@cloud-fan if an external catalog supports pruning, we shouldn't try to
materialize it in memory, since the catalog can probably do a better job of
caching and pruning than we can. Currently you can
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
Thanks @dbtsai for the detailed review! I addressed most comments. We still
need to:
* Decide whether to handle numClasses being specified in metadata
* Decide what happens when
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75352968
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63993/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #63993 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63993/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user BryanCutler commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12790
Yeah, there is no default value in the Scala side. So I guess the thing to
do here is to just give a better error message in Python when the param is not
set and document the behavior a little
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14693
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63992/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14693
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14693
**[Test build #63991 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63991/consoleFull)**
for PR 14693 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350270
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350253
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350213
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #63992 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63992/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558
Yes, I see. I was thinking about the case where the generic function has
but the corresponding method doesn't. In that case, if we add a dummy `...` at
the end of the argument list, its meaning is
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75351207
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -952,13 +963,160 @@ private class LogisticAggregator(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75351025
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350717
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350650
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350481
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796
**[Test build #63996 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63996/consoleFull)**
for PR 13796 at commit
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350406
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,622 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14693
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63991/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350300
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350200
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350142
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350108
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350099
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75350080
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349959
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349924
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349907
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349892
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349872
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349819
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349849
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13796#discussion_r75349832
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/MultinomialLogisticRegression.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,611 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user jaceklaskowski commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14680
@rxin @HyukjinKwon Mind reviewing it again and letting me know what you
think? I know it's minor but would greatly appreciate having it merged at your
earliest convenience. Thanks.
---
If
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
**[Test build #63995 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63995/consoleFull)**
for PR 14702 at commit
Github user felixcheung commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639#discussion_r75347400
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ sparkRHive.init <- function(jsc = NULL) {
#' @note sparkR.session since 2.0.0
sparkR.session
GitHub user tejasapatil opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14702
[SPARK-15694] Implement ScriptTransformation in sql/core
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Added `ScriptTransformationExec` which would run script operator in SQL
Github user taiyangdixia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14701
ok
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user taiyangdixia closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14701
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14701
Close this PR please?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user taiyangdixia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14701
wq
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14701
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user taiyangdixia opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14701
update-test
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
(Please explain how
Github user felixcheung commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558
Does having ... in setGeneric forces CRAN checks to require @param there?
I think @mengxr point is that so long as the function definition also has
... we could have one @param at the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63986/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14583
**[Test build #63986 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63986/consoleFull)**
for PR 14583 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63987/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user shivaram commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639#discussion_r75344423
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/sparkR.R ---
@@ -344,6 +344,7 @@ sparkRHive.init <- function(jsc = NULL) {
#' @note sparkR.session since 2.0.0
sparkR.session <-
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14571
**[Test build #63987 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63987/consoleFull)**
for PR 14571 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
**[Test build #63988 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63988/consoleFull)**
for PR 14527 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14689
Hi, @hvanhovell .
Could you review this PR when you have some time?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user shivaram commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14639
@zjffdu Thanks for clarifying -- I now remember that in the YARN cluster
mode there is no `SPARK_HOME` set. However in this case the JVM comes up first
and the R process then connects to it. So in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14689
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14689
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63985/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14689
**[Test build #63985 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63985/consoleFull)**
for PR 14689 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63988/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14527
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
**[Test build #63994 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63994/consoleFull)**
for PR 14623 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14623
Hi, @rxin .
Could you review this second try for `window_function.sql`? I simplified
the test for our eyeballs.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and
Github user junyangq commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14558
Yes, because the generic function and the method are grouped in the same
doc and we can only give one description for both of the `...`, we want the
actual meaning of them to be same.
---
If
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14155#discussion_r75339230
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveExternalCatalog.scala ---
@@ -144,16 +163,172 @@ private[spark] class
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13680
for 1, currently we only store offsets for var-length element, we should
store offset and length as the element content will be word-aligned.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63984/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12004
**[Test build #63984 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63984/consoleFull)**
for PR 12004 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #63993 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63993/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user MechCoder commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12790
If that's the case then the piece of documentation that promises the
Pipeline to behave as an identity transformer when no stages are used, has to
be changed (removed).
---
If your project is
Github user sitalkedia commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14693
@rxin - I am not sure if there is an easy way to unit test this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
@kayousterhout @tgravescs Sorry for the long-delay on my end, I have
finally updated this. I think I have addressed all the naming / commenting
issues -- I'm going to do a bit more testing on it
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14693
**[Test build #63991 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63991/consoleFull)**
for PR 14693 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #63992 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63992/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63990/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
**[Test build #63990 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/63990/consoleFull)**
for PR 14079 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user sitalkedia commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14693#discussion_r75333091
--- Diff:
core/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/util/collection/unsafe/sort/UnsafeExternalSorter.java
---
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@ public long spill() throws
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14079
Build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
401 - 500 of 667 matches
Mail list logo
