Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
**[Test build #66453 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66453/consoleFull)**
for PR 15044 at commit
[`68d34de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370#discussion_r82253107
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -71,6 +72,12 @@ private[spark] object CallSite {
private[spark] object Utils ext
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868#discussion_r82252372
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH = SQLConfigBuil
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370#discussion_r82252000
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -83,8 +84,9 @@ private[spark] class ReliableCheckpointRDD[T: ClassTag](
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15365
From Jekins, I saw the error:
WARNING: There was 1 warning.
NOTE: There were 3 notes.
See
'/home/jenkins/workspace/SparkPullRequestBuilder/R/SparkR.Rcheck/00check.log'
for
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370
**[Test build #66454 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66454/consoleFull)**
for PR 15370 at commit
[`580a50b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Sorry something weird seems to have happened yesterday where github
published half of my review! Anyway the rest is above.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user tgravescs commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15374#discussion_r82249178
--- Diff:
common/tags/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/annotation/InterfaceStability.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Softwa
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82105712
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetBlacklist.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82105546
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetBlacklist.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82104084
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -22,13 +22,13 @@ import java.util.{Timer, TimerTask}
impor
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82105149
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,123 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82105053
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetBlacklist.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82105250
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetBlacklist.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82103864
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/ExecutorFailuresInTaskSet.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,53 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache S
Github user kayousterhout commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82105321
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSetBlacklist.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,135 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software F
Github user wangmiao1981 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15365
@felixcheung When run check-cran, there are errors:
Error : requireNamespace("e1071", quietly = TRUE) is not TRUE
Error : requireNamespace("e1071", quietly = TRUE) is not TRUE
Error
Github user olarayej commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
@falaki Absolutely. Let me do that. Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this fea
Github user falaki commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11336
@olarayej are you interested in rebasing this PR and limiting its user
impact to just `head` for now? We can continue the discussion on support for
distributed vector (a.k.a. `Column`) in JIRA and wh
Github user vanzin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15374
+1. I also agree that audience is not as useful as these; the three
annotations here should cover the vast majority of use cases without the need
to differentiate who's using the API.
---
If your p
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15371
One comment: once you figured out the proper fix, please add some comments
inline so they don't get accidentally removed in the future.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this ema
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044#discussion_r82244393
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflection.scala
---
@@ -441,6 +441,28 @@ object ScalaReflection extends ScalaRe
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15374#discussion_r82243978
--- Diff:
common/tags/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/annotation/InterfaceStability.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Fo
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15373
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15346
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66451/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15346
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15373
Thanks! Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15346
**[Test build #66451 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66451/consoleFull)**
for PR 15346 at commit
[`605aeb6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15318
Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15044
**[Test build #66453 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66453/consoleFull)**
for PR 15044 at commit
[`68d34de`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15376
**[Test build #66452 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66452/consoleFull)**
for PR 15376 at commit
[`dfdfc46`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Actually my comment about locality wait makes me wonder if that should be
taking blacklisting into account as well here, something I hadn't looked at
closely before. There is no reason to wait for
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15367
This is rather a lot of functionality to backport, our backport guide
doesn't seem to quite line up with this (based on
https://www.mail-archive.com/dev@spark.apache.org/msg10284.html /
https://cw
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15376
The only test failure is irrelevant. Locally, it passed.
```
[info] - MAP append/extract *** FAILED *** (2 milliseconds)
[info] java.lang.IllegalArgumentException:
```
---
If
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15376
Retest this please.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15318
Sure. I'll make abackport for this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15378
Yay easier testing for developers :) +1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
ena
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15318
Merging to master. Thanks!
I think we also need to merge it to 2.0 branch, right?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub a
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15318
Thank you, @rxin and @gatorsmile .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11105
ping @rxin & @squito - I'd really like to try and get this in for 2.1 if
its possible.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249
Sorry I haven't followed this PR since it was split off the main one.
Response might be a bit split as its talking about various responses if
something doesn't make sense let me know.
>
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15318
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9766
re-ping @davies :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354#discussion_r82230165
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1729,6 +1729,29 @@ def from_json(col, schema, options={}):
return Column(jc)
+@igno
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15354#discussion_r82229892
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -1729,6 +1729,29 @@ def from_json(col, schema, options={}):
return Column(jc)
+@igno
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r82230001
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -303,6 +312,10 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
@Since("1.5.0")
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r82229991
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -303,6 +312,10 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
@Since("1.5.0")
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15249#discussion_r82229032
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskSchedulerImpl.scala ---
@@ -243,8 +243,8 @@ private[spark] class TaskSchedulerImpl(
}
Github user holdenk commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
@zjffdu Enjoy vacation and no worries - I don't think this is blocking
anything and we can circle back in a week :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
r
Github user holdenk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370#discussion_r82228045
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -83,8 +84,9 @@ private[spark] class ReliableCheckpointRDD[T: ClassTag](
Github user dhruve commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370
Using the NumberFormat will simplify the case and address both types.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project d
Github user lins05 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377#discussion_r82224216
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2474,25 +2474,36 @@ private[spark] class CallerContext(
val context = "SPARK_"
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15346
**[Test build #66451 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66451/consoleFull)**
for PR 15346 at commit
[`605aeb6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/6
Github user koertkuipers commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13868#discussion_r82216818
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -55,7 +56,7 @@ object SQLConf {
val WAREHOUSE_PATH = SQLConf
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/9#discussion_r82215606
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/KMeans.scala
---
@@ -303,6 +312,10 @@ class KMeans @Since("1.5.0") (
@Since("1.5.0")
Github user BenFradet commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15364
Lgtm :+1:
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if th
Github user kxepal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15361
@HyukjinKwon Thank you a lot! Staying tuned.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15361
I will test this and fix it here together as well if there are some more
cases to handle. Thanks for verifying this PR.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and hav
Github user kxepal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15361
@HyukjinKwon
Ok, try something like this:
```
scala> val sv = org.apache.spark.mllib.linalg.Vectors.sparse(7, Array(0,
42), Array(-127, 128))
sv: org.apache.spark.mllib.linalg.Vector
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #66449 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66449/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`bc2fb25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66449/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370
How about instead of harding this to 5 or 10 digits we use
java.text.NumberFormat, set the minimum to 5 digits but it allows going over.
This way its automatically handles backwards compatible and
Github user zjffdu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13493
Sorry, I am in vacation. Will update it next week.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13521
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12983
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user zhengruifeng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12135
@MLnick I have remove the unused api on the Scala side, and only the
multicol version is used.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370#discussion_r82181763
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -93,19 +95,39 @@ private[spark] class ReliableCheckpointRDD[T: ClassTag]
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370#discussion_r82181554
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -83,8 +84,9 @@ private[spark] class ReliableCheckpointRDD[T: ClassTag](
Github user tgravescs commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15374
sorry Reynold, looks like I somehow missed your response on email about
this.
Comment question, otherwise looks good.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email a
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377#discussion_r82181784
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2474,25 +2474,36 @@ private[spark] class CallerContext(
val context = "SPARK_"
Github user dhruve commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15370#discussion_r82180981
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/ReliableCheckpointRDD.scala ---
@@ -72,7 +72,8 @@ private[spark] class ReliableCheckpointRDD[T: ClassTag](
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15361
@kxepal, Sure, I will definitely try to reproduce as soon as you do.
Meanwhile, let me double check this. Thanks.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66450/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
**[Test build #66450 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66450/consoleFull)**
for PR 15239 at commit
[`eeb7db5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user kxepal commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15361
@HyukjinKwon
Thanks for the patch, but suddenly it doesn't solves the issue. Tested with
2.0.0 Spark:
```
Caused by: java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.spark.mllib.linalg.VectorUDT
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15239
**[Test build #66450 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66450/consoleFull)**
for PR 15239 at commit
[`eeb7db5`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690
**[Test build #66448 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66448/consoleFull)**
for PR 13690 at commit
[`d034735`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66448/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66447/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #66447 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66447/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`112ddcb`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user MLnick commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12761
@daniel-siegmann-aol will you have time to work on this? I think it will be
important to have this in Spark 2.1. If not, I think between @dbtsai, @sethah
and myself we can help take it forward.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #66449 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66449/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`bc2fb25`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15378
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15378
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66445/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15378
**[Test build #66445 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66445/consoleFull)**
for PR 15378 at commit
[`25e106b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15378
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66444/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15378
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15378
**[Test build #66444 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66444/consoleFull)**
for PR 15378 at commit
[`25e106b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66443/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13690
**[Test build #66448 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66448/consoleFull)**
for PR 13690 at commit
[`d034735`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/d
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #66443 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66443/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`3b5f9e4`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377#discussion_r82159342
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/Utils.scala ---
@@ -2474,25 +2474,34 @@ private[spark] class CallerContext(
val context = "SPARK_"
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66440/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15377
**[Test build #66440 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/66440/consoleFull)**
for PR 15377 at commit
[`b8621ab`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
301 - 400 of 485 matches
Mail list logo
