Github user ajbozarth commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15441
@srowen @tgravescs any chance you'd be able to take a look at this before
spark summit?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as w
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
Can you change the tile to "JVM object" rather than "Java object"?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590#discussion_r84553296
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectHashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590#discussion_r84553255
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectHashAggregateExec.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user rxin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590#discussion_r84553559
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/ObjectAggregationIterator.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,323 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to th
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67357 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67357/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`1b73b7b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/1
GitHub user AbhiMadav opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15591
[SPARK-17922] [SQL] ClassCastException java.lang.ClassCastException:
org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.expressions.GeneratedClass$GeneratedIterator
cannot be cast to org.apache.spark.sql.catalyst.express
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15591
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15581
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15581
@cloud-fan there are conflicts with 2.0. Could you submit another PR for
that?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If you
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15581
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67358 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67358/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`4da7724`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
**[Test build #67350 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67350/consoleFull)**
for PR 14553 at commit
[`47eee52`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14553
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67350/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67359 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67359/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`34b1ae6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15504
**[Test build #3369 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3369/consoleFull)**
for PR 15504 at commit
[`c188461`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15504
LGTM. Merging to master and 2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
**[Test build #67344 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67344/consoleFull)**
for PR 15580 at commit
[`d3ddaf7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67344/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15504
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14050
**[Test build #67360 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67360/consoleFull)**
for PR 14050 at commit
[`fed1761`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
**[Test build #67346 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67346/consoleFull)**
for PR 15539 at commit
[`2a96537`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67346/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84422762
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -571,6 +571,37 @@ class ParquetQuerySu
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84422376
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrategy e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84436528
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -97,7 +99,15 @@ object FileSourceStrategy ext
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84422353
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrategy e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84406104
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -97,7 +99,15 @@ object FileSourceStrategy ext
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84559521
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrategy e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84558190
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrategy e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84422606
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
.cre
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84422346
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/FileSourceStrategy.scala
---
@@ -126,4 +136,52 @@ object FileSourceStrategy e
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84422485
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -212,6 +212,11 @@ object SQLConf {
.booleanConf
.cre
Github user liancheng commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957#discussion_r84422636
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -661,6 +666,8 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
GitHub user tdas opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15592
[SPARK-17624][SQL][STREAMING][TEST] Fixed flaky StateStoreSuite.maintenance
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The reason for the flakiness was follows. The test starts the ma
Github user tdas commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15592
@zsxwing Can you take a look?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wish
Github user zsxwing commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15570
LGTM. Thanks! Merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15592
**[Test build #67361 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67361/consoleFull)**
for PR 15592 at commit
[`96079fe`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15570
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
GitHub user sethah opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
[SPARK-18060][ML] Avoid unnecessary computation for MLOR
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Before this patch, the gradient updates for multinomial logistic regression
were
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
cc @dbtsai
This may improve the problems you mentioned you were having on
[SPARK-17134](https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-17134) :)
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user liancheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
I'm closing this since caching is not the ultimate solution for this
problem anyway. Caching is too memory consuming when you, say, computing
connected components in an iterative way over a graph
Github user liancheng closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15517
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14050
**[Test build #67360 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67360/consoleFull)**
for PR 14050 at commit
[`fed1761`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14050
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14050
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67360/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
**[Test build #67362 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67362/consoleFull)**
for PR 15593 at commit
[`07fd150`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/0
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14957
Together with this one, we should have a optimizer rule that could 1)
extract GetStructField (and others) and push that down closer to the data
source, or 2) flatten all the nested field in data sou
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
@cloud-fan I think this is pretty close once
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15539 is merged.
The only remaining issues I know about are (1) supporting mixed case
columns, and (2) optimi
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84561834
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Bucketizer.scala
---
@@ -73,15 +74,51 @@ final class Bucketizer @Since("1.4.0") (@Since("1.4.0")
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84562692
--- Diff: docs/ml-features.md ---
@@ -1104,9 +1104,11 @@ for more details on the API.
`QuantileDiscretizer` takes a column with continuous features and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67355 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67355/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`de6c00d`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67355/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
lgtm
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15520#discussion_r84563401
--- Diff: scalastyle-config.xml ---
@@ -200,6 +200,7 @@ This file is divided into 3 sections:
// scalastyle:off awaitresult
Await.result(.
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84563374
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +102,24 @@ final class QuantileDiscretizer @Since("1.6.0
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84563479
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Bucketizer.scala
---
@@ -73,15 +74,51 @@ final class Bucketizer @Since("1.4.0") (@Since("1.4.0")
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84563480
--- Diff: mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/Bucketizer.scala
---
@@ -73,15 +74,51 @@ final class Bucketizer @Since("1.4.0") (@Since("1.4.0")
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84563237
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -1157,9 +1157,11 @@ class QuantileDiscretizer(JavaEstimator,
HasInputCol, HasOutputCol, JavaMLReadab
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84563388
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizer.scala ---
@@ -100,6 +102,24 @@ final class QuantileDiscretizer @Since("1.6.0
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15428#discussion_r84563124
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/feature/QuantileDiscretizerSuite.scala
---
@@ -82,14 +82,23 @@ class QuantileDiscretizerSuite
Github user ericl commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Looks like two failing tests in FileStreamSourceSuite
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84564333
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/NormalEquationSolver.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84564368
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/NormalEquationSolver.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,153 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software Foun
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84564391
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -44,35 +46,52 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquaresModel(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84564447
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -85,73 +104,198 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquares(
Github user sethah commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394#discussion_r84564414
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/optim/WeightedLeastSquares.scala ---
@@ -44,35 +46,52 @@ private[ml] class WeightedLeastSquaresModel(
Github user sethah commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394
cc @dbtsai Would be great if you get a chance to look at this.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user rxin commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
Thanks - I'm going to merge this. I will address the doc and naming comment
in the next pr in this series.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15394
**[Test build #67363 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67363/consoleFull)**
for PR 15394 at commit
[`28f8c2f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15580
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67358 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67358/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`4da7724`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67358/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67357 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67357/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`1b73b7b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
**[Test build #67356 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67356/consoleFull)**
for PR 15590 at commit
[`c8ec18b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67357/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67356/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15590
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
**[Test build #67362 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67362/consoleFull)**
for PR 15593 at commit
[`07fd150`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15593
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67362/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
**[Test build #67345 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67345/consoleFull)**
for PR 15553 at commit
[`ec49e8b`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67345/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15553
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67359 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67359/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`34b1ae6`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67359/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
**[Test build #67349 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67349/consoleFull)**
for PR 15463 at commit
[`cd6d240`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15463
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67349/
Test FAILed.
---
GitHub user cmirash opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15594
[SPARK-18061][SQL][Security] Spark Thriftserver needs to create SPNego
principal
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Spark Thriftserver when running in HTTP mode with Kerberos e
GitHub user CodingCat opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
[SPARK-18058][SQL] Comparing column types ignoring Nullability in
BinaryOperator
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
The PR tries to fix
[SPARK-18058](https://issues.apa
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15515
**[Test build #67365 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67365/consoleFull)**
for PR 15515 at commit
[`f903243`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15595
**[Test build #67364 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/67364/consoleFull)**
for PR 15595 at commit
[`c62f84f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
201 - 300 of 402 matches
Mail list logo
