Github user vijoshi commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16119
@cloud-fan sure, i'll push an update soon
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93824925
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+-- A test suite for simple IN predica
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16296#discussion_r93824911
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SparkSqlParser.scala ---
@@ -342,42 +342,46 @@ class SparkSqlAstBuilder(conf: SQLConf) ex
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93823456
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(child
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93823424
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in par
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93823423
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in par
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93823420
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+-- A test suite for simple IN predicat
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93823418
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+-- A test suite for simple IN predicat
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93823421
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in par
Github user kevinyu98 commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93823414
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in par
Github user itg-abby commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15496
@holdenk
Thanks for the review and your availability, I really appreciate the work
you are doing too by mentoring me! I didn't realize np.append was making
copies, though it made a lot of sens
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15604
Hi @kayousterhout @markhamstra @squito,
This PR aims to extend Pool usage policies unit test coverage and is also
ready for review.
Thanks and all feedbacks are welcome in advance ;
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93821052
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+-- A test suite for simple IN predicate su
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93821009
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in parent
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93820846
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70571/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237
**[Test build #70571 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70571/testReport)**
for PR 15237 at commit
[`a4e06b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16388#discussion_r93819750
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -408,8 +408,8 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93819586
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in pa
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93819526
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+-- A test suite for simple IN predica
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93819517
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in pa
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392
cc @yhuai @cloud-fan @liancheng
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r93819357
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/SchedulableBuilder.scala ---
@@ -102,38 +105,55 @@ private[spark] class FairSchedulableBui
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237#discussion_r93819365
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PoolSuite.scala ---
@@ -178,4 +177,36 @@ class PoolSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
LocalS
Github user erenavsarogullari commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237
Hi @squito,
Many thanks again for review. All comments have just been addressed via new
commit.
Also It is ready to rereview / merge ;)
---
If your project is set up for it, you c
Github user davies commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14452
@viirya For duplicated CTE, without some optimization (pushing down
different predicates in different positions), the physical plan should be
identical. So I'm wondering some aggressive pushing down
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70570/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70570 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70570/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
[`28df09f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/2
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70569/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70569 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70569/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
[`a00d52f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15237
**[Test build #70571 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70571/testReport)**
for PR 15237 at commit
[`a4e06b2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a4
Github user zhaorongsheng commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16389
Yes, I have checked it.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and w
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391#discussion_r93818360
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -170,36 +176,39 @@ object DatasetBenchmark {
val benchmark3 =
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351
@cloud-fan Thank you!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishe
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wi
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93817737
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(chil
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70570 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70570/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
[`28df09f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/28
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93817572
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(chil
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16308
**[Test build #70569 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70569/testReport)**
for PR 16308 at commit
[`a00d52f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a0
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232
Thanks @davies @srowen
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93817299
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in parent
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93817255
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -58,77 +58,126 @@ case class CreateArray(child
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93817238
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in parent
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93817231
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(chil
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93817216
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(child
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93817218
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/simple-in.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
+-- A test suite for simple IN predicate su
Github user nsyca commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16337#discussion_r93817165
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/resources/sql-tests/inputs/subquery/in-subquery/in-group-by.sql
---
@@ -0,0 +1,117 @@
+-- A test suite for GROUP BY in parent
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16338
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16338
Merged to master/2.1
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16240#discussion_r93816848
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetPrimitiveSuite.scala ---
@@ -130,6 +130,30 @@ class DatasetPrimitiveSuite extends QueryTest w
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16393
I can reproduce this now on a clean build. I don't think the whole change
needs to be reverted; I think it's narrower than that. test-tags no longer has
any dependency on Scala libs but does referenc
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16232
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user michalsenkyr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16240#discussion_r93816269
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLImplicits.scala
---
@@ -100,31 +97,36 @@ abstract class SQLImplicits {
// Seqs
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70567/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392
**[Test build #70567 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70567/testReport)**
for PR 16392 at commit
[`5221494`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70568/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70568 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70568/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
[`327c8ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/3
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70566/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351
**[Test build #70566 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70566/testReport)**
for PR 16351 at commit
[`a036b7f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93815064
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -58,77 +58,126 @@ case class CreateArray(child
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93815041
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(chil
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93815032
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(child
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13758
shall we close it?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so,
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814957
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,130 @@ case class CreateArray(c
Github user ueshin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814866
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -58,77 +58,126 @@ case class CreateArray(chil
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814845
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -58,77 +58,126 @@ case class CreateArray(child
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814832
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -58,77 +58,126 @@ case class CreateArray(child
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814790
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -58,77 +58,126 @@ case class CreateArray(chil
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391#discussion_r93814766
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -170,36 +176,39 @@ object DatasetBenchmark {
val benchmark3 = agg
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814750
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -58,77 +58,126 @@ case class CreateArray(chil
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16391#discussion_r93814744
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DatasetBenchmark.scala ---
@@ -133,24 +134,29 @@ object DatasetBenchmark {
def aggregate(spark: S
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814713
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,81 @@ case class CreateArray(ch
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909
**[Test build #70568 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70568/testReport)**
for PR 13909 at commit
[`327c8ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/32
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814699
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,81 @@ case class CreateArray(childr
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
I also like the last option that is based on local states/variables,
especially when we supporting `spark.sql.hive.thriftServer.singleSession`.
Here, the disadvantages of session/analyzer-scoped
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814696
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,81 @@ case class CreateArray(childr
Github user kiszk commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13909#discussion_r93814681
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/complexTypeCreator.scala
---
@@ -56,33 +58,81 @@ case class CreateArray(childr
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392
**[Test build #70567 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70567/testReport)**
for PR 16392 at commit
[`5221494`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/52
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16392
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351
**[Test build #70566 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/70566/testReport)**
for PR 16351 at commit
[`a036b7f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a0
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16351#discussion_r93814412
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/csv/CSVTypeCastSuite.scala
---
@@ -66,144 +66,138 @@ class CSVTypeCastSuite
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16383
LGTM. This is a cool improvement.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled an
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16383#discussion_r93814369
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/aggregate/TypedAggregateExpression.scala
---
@@ -143,15 +197,96 @@ case class TypedAggregate
91 matches
Mail list logo
