Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95061858
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/catalog/SessionCatalogSuite.scala
---
@@ -465,6 +466,48 @@ class SessionCatalogSuite
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95061656
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/HiveMetastoreCatalog.scala ---
@@ -125,11 +132,16 @@ private[hive] class
HiveMetastoreCatalog
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95061267
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -767,7 +857,45 @@ class Analyzer(
}
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95061685
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/client/HiveClientImpl.scala
---
@@ -845,6 +846,7 @@ private[hive] class HiveClientImpl(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95063136
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLViewBackwardCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95063718
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLViewBackwardCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95063071
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/SQLViewBackwardCompatibilitySuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
+/*
+ * Licen
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95061229
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -767,7 +857,45 @@ class Analyzer(
}
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95061276
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -767,7 +857,45 @@ class Analyzer(
}
}
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95060659
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -510,32 +539,93 @@ class Analyzer(
* Replaces
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233#discussion_r95061636
--- Diff: sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/SQLQuerySuite.scala
---
@@ -2476,4 +2476,17 @@ class SQLQuerySuite extends QueryTest with
SharedSQ
Github user jkbradley commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16491
Yikes, thanks for fixing this!
LGTM
Merging with master
I'll also try to merge it with branch-2.1, branch-2.0, branch-1.6 but will
say if I run into issues.
---
If your project is set
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16498
How does this relate to https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15848 ?
As I understand you already hit problems and were not able to debug them.
What's different here?
I was going to close the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16498
**[Test build #71021 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71021/testReport)**
for PR 16498 at commit
[`b338ca9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b3
Github user tanejagagan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16497
@hvanhovell
Can you please review the changes
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have t
GitHub user skanjila opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16498
SPARK-9487][Tests] Begin the work of robustifying unit tests , start with
ContextCleanerSuite
â¦tests
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This is a work in progress p
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16497
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feat
GitHub user tanejagagan opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16497
[SPARK-19118] [SQL] Percentile support for frequency distribution table
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
I have a frequency distribution table with following entries
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15770
**[Test build #71020 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71020/testReport)**
for PR 15770 at commit
[`754112f`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/75
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16496
**[Test build #71019 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71019/testReport)**
for PR 16496 at commit
[`943ebb7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/94
Github user kayousterhout commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
It looks like you've added multi-threading for task serialization here,
which I'm hesitant about for reasons @squito discussed in the JIRA (namely, I
think reducing the size of the data serial
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71018/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
**[Test build #71018 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71018/testReport)**
for PR 16400 at commit
[`e60ec43`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71017/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #71017 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71017/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`ccf3830`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16496
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16496
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71016/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16496
**[Test build #71016 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71016/testReport)**
for PR 16496 at commit
[`b8d97f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the fe
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
**[Test build #71018 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71018/testReport)**
for PR 16400 at commit
[`e60ec43`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/e6
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400
Thank you, @gatorsmile . I updated the commit and description of this PR.
You can see the new image from generated doc.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and h
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95061882
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated, alternative
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16400#discussion_r95061877
--- Diff: docs/sql-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -1362,6 +1362,13 @@ options.
- Dataset and DataFrame API `explode` has been deprecated, alternative
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16493
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes s
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71015/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16487#discussion_r95061418
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/DataFrameWriter.scala ---
@@ -385,6 +380,8 @@ final class DataFrameWriter[T] private[sql](ds:
Datas
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
**[Test build #71015 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71015/testReport)**
for PR 16451 at commit
[`f045d77`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16487#discussion_r95061397
--- Diff:
sql/hive/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/execution/HiveDDLSuite.scala
---
@@ -1289,4 +1290,66 @@ class HiveDDLSuite
}
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16479
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16479
thanks for the review, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16443
**[Test build #3523 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3523/testReport)**
for PR 16443 at commit
[`aba53d9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16440
Thank you for approving, @srowen .
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
en
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95060664
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95060633
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -340,3 +341,91 @@ object CaseKeyWhen {
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95060564
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +139,48 @@ class ConditionalE
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71012/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95060448
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +139,48 @@ class ConditionalE
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95060436
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +139,48 @@ class ConditionalE
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #71012 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71012/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`cd531d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95060369
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +139,48 @@ class ConditionalE
Github user gczsjdy commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16476#discussion_r95060307
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/ConditionalExpressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -137,4 +139,48 @@ class ConditionalE
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71014/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #71014 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71014/testReport)**
for PR 15413 at commit
[`fa5b1ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #71017 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71017/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`ccf3830`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cc
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16496
**[Test build #71016 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71016/testReport)**
for PR 16496 at commit
[`b8d97f7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/b8
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16496
cc @cloud-fan
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16496
[SPARK-16101][SQL] Refactoring CSV write path to be consistent with JSON
data source
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR refactors CSV write path to be consiste
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71011/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
**[Test build #71011 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71011/testReport)**
for PR 16233 at commit
[`5fbf1d7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16488
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16488
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312#discussion_r95059202
--- Diff: R/pkg/R/mllib_utils.R ---
@@ -80,9 +81,9 @@ predict_internal <- function(object, newData) {
#' model <- read.ml(path)
#' }
#' @not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
**[Test build #71013 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71013/testReport)**
for PR 16312 at commit
[`c81db86`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71013/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Build started: [TESTS]
`org.apache.spark.streaming.kafka010.DirectKafkaStreamSuite`
[**
for PR 16451 at commit
[`f045d77`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/f0
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Ah, thank you.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, o
Github user yanboliang commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413#discussion_r95058896
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/clustering/GaussianMixtureSuite.scala
---
@@ -126,9 +143,104 @@ class GaussianMixtureSuite extends Spa
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15413
**[Test build #71014 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71014/testReport)**
for PR 15413 at commit
[`fa5b1ac`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/fa
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Yeah, that's great. That narrows down the fix a bit.
I bet there are other places in tests where we could use the same logic, to
only ignore the error on Windows, but unless you know of obvious pl
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r95058504
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -630,35 +630,106 @@ which creates a DStream from text
data received over a TCP socket connection. Bes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r95058826
--- Diff:
streaming/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/InputStreamsSuite.scala ---
@@ -235,18 +236,97 @@ class InputStreamsSuite extends TestSuiteBase
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r95058534
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -630,35 +630,106 @@ which creates a DStream from text
data received over a TCP socket connection. Bes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r95058852
--- Diff:
streaming/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/streaming/dstream/FileInputDStream.scala
---
@@ -196,29 +191,29 @@ class FileInputDStream[K, V, F <: NewI
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r95058662
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -630,35 +630,106 @@ which creates a DStream from text
data received over a TCP socket connection. Bes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r95058521
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -630,35 +630,106 @@ which creates a DStream from text
data received over a TCP socket connection. Bes
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/14731#discussion_r95058508
--- Diff: docs/streaming-programming-guide.md ---
@@ -630,35 +630,106 @@ which creates a DStream from text
data received over a TCP socket connection. Bes
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
I made a new function just simply because it repeats the same logics.
Either way is fine with me.
So.. do you mean something like the one as below?
```scala
try {
Util
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16312
**[Test build #71013 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71013/testReport)**
for PR 16312 at commit
[`c81db86`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/c8
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16443
**[Test build #3523 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/3523/testReport)**
for PR 16443 at commit
[`aba53d9`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/a
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16443
@hustfxj please fix the description
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16490
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16490
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71010/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16490
**[Test build #71010 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71010/testReport)**
for PR 16490 at commit
[`98b721e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/9
Github user hustfxj commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16443
@vanzin @srowen @dongjoon-hyun can you review again ? and help me review
[SPARK-18959] and [SPARK-19052], thank you very much.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email an
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/15505
**[Test build #71012 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71012/testReport)**
for PR 15505 at commit
[`cd531d2`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/cd
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16233
**[Test build #71011 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71011/testReport)**
for PR 16233 at commit
[`5fbf1d7`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/5f
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13771
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user srowen commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13771
Merged to master
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or i
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16490
**[Test build #71010 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71010/testReport)**
for PR 16490 at commit
[`98b721e`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/98
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
e
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71009/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/16451
**[Test build #71009 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/71009/testReport)**
for PR 16451 at commit
[`4e0b166`](https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/4
101 - 200 of 233 matches
Mail list logo
