Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17848#discussion_r127635707
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/expressions/UserDefinedFunction.scala
---
@@ -103,4 +110,19 @@ case class UserDefinedFunction
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18580
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79651/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18580
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18580
**[Test build #79651 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79651/testReport)**
for PR 18580 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18580
LGTM, pending jenkins
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79650/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79650 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79650/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/17848
**[Test build #79658 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79658/testReport)**
for PR 17848 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
**[Test build #79657 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79657/testReport)**
for PR 18649 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79657/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
**[Test build #79657 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79657/testReport)**
for PR 18649 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18628
looks good according to the existing similar code, but I'm not very
familiar with this part code of code, will leave it for a few days if someone
else has some comments.
Also cc
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18628#discussion_r127631011
--- Diff:
sql/hive-thriftserver/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/hive/thriftserver/SparkSQLCLIService.scala
---
@@ -57,6 +59,20 @@ private[hive]
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18631
**[Test build #79656 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79656/testReport)**
for PR 18631 at commit
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18631
cc @srowen is it ok to do this? e.g. `rdd.sortByKey(numPartitions = 10)`,
do we have to return an RDD of 10 partitions even some of them are empty?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18631
ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18612
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79652/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18612
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18612
**[Test build #79652 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79652/testReport)**
for PR 18612 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79654/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
**[Test build #79654 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79654/testReport)**
for PR 18615 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79653/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
**[Test build #79653 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79653/testReport)**
for PR 18615 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18624
**[Test build #79655 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79655/testReport)**
for PR 18624 at commit
Github user mpjlu commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18624
I have checked the results with the master method, the recommendation
results are right.
The master TestSuite is too simple, should be updated. I will update it.
Thanks.
---
If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
**[Test build #79654 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79654/testReport)**
for PR 18615 at commit
Github user viirya commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
LGTM
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
Thanks @viirya.
@holdenk, I happened to find another issue and tried to fix both here
together.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615#discussion_r127627470
--- Diff: python/pyspark/sql/functions.py ---
@@ -2087,10 +2087,22 @@ def _wrapped(self):
"""
Wrap this udf with a function and
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18615
**[Test build #79653 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79653/testReport)**
for PR 18615 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18612
**[Test build #79652 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79652/testReport)**
for PR 18612 at commit
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18641#discussion_r127626187
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -273,12 +274,31 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18641#discussion_r127626045
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18641#discussion_r127625999
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -72,11 +72,11 @@ case class
Github user viirya commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18641#discussion_r127625968
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/conditionalExpressions.scala
---
@@ -273,12 +274,31 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18580#discussion_r127625865
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/rules.scala
---
@@ -409,6 +409,42 @@ object HiveOnlyCheck extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18580
**[Test build #79651 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79651/testReport)**
for PR 18580 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79649/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #79649 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79649/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79650 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79650/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18646
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18646
thanks, merging to master!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18580#discussion_r127621186
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/CheckAnalysis.scala
---
@@ -74,6 +74,15 @@ trait CheckAnalysis extends
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13599
**[Test build #79649 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79649/testReport)**
for PR 13599 at commit
Github user debugger87 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
@cloud-fan Could you please help me to review this PR? Thanks a lot!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user debugger87 opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18649
[SPARK-21395][SQL] Spark SQL hive-thriftserver doesn't register operation
log before execute sql statement
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
- Add a private method
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r127614336
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/MathUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r127614328
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/MathUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user skonto commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18630
@jerryshao
>
Are you trying to support --packages in standalone cluster?
Yes that is my intention as stated in the description. I will proceed with
the changes thnx for
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18630#discussion_r127614213
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverWrapper.scala ---
@@ -66,4 +75,50 @@ object DriverWrapper {
System.exit(-1)
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18630#discussion_r127614182
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/worker/DriverWrapper.scala ---
@@ -66,4 +75,50 @@ object DriverWrapper {
System.exit(-1)
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r127614121
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1186,3 +1186,51 @@ case class
Github user skonto commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18630#discussion_r127613972
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/SparkSubmit.scala ---
@@ -473,6 +474,12 @@ object SparkSubmit extends CommandLineUtils {
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r127613839
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/MathExpressionsSuite.scala
---
@@ -644,4 +645,37 @@ class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r127613829
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/MathUtils.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,57 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r127613753
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1186,3 +1186,51 @@ case class
Github user gatorsmile commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18323#discussion_r127613668
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/expressions/mathExpressions.scala
---
@@ -1186,3 +1186,51 @@ case class
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18637
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18637
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79646/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18637
**[Test build #79646 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79646/testReport)**
for PR 18637 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79648/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79648 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79648/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user a10y commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18424#discussion_r127611976
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/parquet/ParquetFilters.scala
---
@@ -238,6 +238,14 @@ private[parquet] object
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18646
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79644/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18646
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18646
**[Test build #79644 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79644/testReport)**
for PR 18646 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645#discussion_r127611350
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/FutureAction.scala ---
@@ -89,6 +89,14 @@ trait FutureAction[T] extends Future[T] {
*/
override
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645#discussion_r127611390
--- Diff: sql/catalyst/pom.xml ---
@@ -39,6 +39,10 @@
org.scala-lang
scala-reflect
+
--- End diff --
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645#discussion_r127611412
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/Dataset.scala ---
@@ -2537,8 +2537,9 @@ class Dataset[T] private[sql](
* @group action
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645#discussion_r127611421
--- Diff: sql/hive/pom.xml ---
@@ -59,13 +59,6 @@
org.apache.spark
- spark-sql_${scala.binary.version}
--- End
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645#discussion_r127611376
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/TaskContextSuite.scala ---
@@ -54,7 +54,10 @@ class TaskContextSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645#discussion_r127611395
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/ScalaReflectionSuite.scala
---
@@ -339,39 +335,4 @@ class ScalaReflectionSuite extends
Github user gatorsmile closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18643
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature
Github user gatorsmile commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18643
Thanks! Merging to 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18648
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
GitHub user yaooqinn opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18648
[SPARK-21428] Set IsolatedClientLoader off while using builtin Hive jars
for reusing CliSessionState
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Set isolated to false while using
Github user jiangxb1987 commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18631
Please update the title to:
```
[SPARK-21410][CORE] Create less partitions for RangePartitioner if
RDD.count() is less than `partitions`
```
---
If your project is set up for it,
Github user cloud-fan commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18631
Ok to test
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18555
**[Test build #79648 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79648/testReport)**
for PR 18555 at commit
Github user HyukjinKwon commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18647
cc @davies and @joshrosen, I was looking at the first place that introduced
this -
https://github.com/apache/spark/commit/880eabec37c69ce4e9594d7babfac291b0f93f50.
Could you take a look and
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18647
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18647
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79647/
Test PASSed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18647
**[Test build #79647 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79647/testReport)**
for PR 18647 at commit
Github user piyushknoldus closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18644
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18647
**[Test build #79647 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79647/testReport)**
for PR 18647 at commit
GitHub user HyukjinKwon opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18647
[MINOR][PYTHON] Remove obsolete codes for parsing abstract schema strings
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR proposes to remove private functions that look not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79645/
Test FAILed.
---
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645
**[Test build #79645 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79645/testReport)**
for PR 18645 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18637
**[Test build #79646 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79646/testReport)**
for PR 18637 at commit
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18637#discussion_r127608414
--- Diff: pom.xml ---
@@ -2511,8 +2523,8 @@
Github user SparkQA commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/18645
**[Test build #79645 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/79645/testReport)**
for PR 18645 at commit
1 - 100 of 134 matches
Mail list logo
