Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-221153219
Build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-221153222
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-221153068
**[Test build #59168 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59168/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`004b19d`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-221133792
**[Test build #59168 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/59168/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`004b19d`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197818877
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197898733
**[Test build #53426 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53426/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`004b19d`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#discussion_r56599894
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1450,7 +1450,9 @@ object CleanupAliases extends Rule[L
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197792870
hi @marmbrus , yes your idea makes sense, we should use `Alias` to produce
new attributes if we can. Except leaf nodes, there are some special cases we
still need to
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197899144
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197899147
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197818629
**[Test build #53415 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53415/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`cae7b52`](https://g
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#discussion_r56599961
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1450,7 +1450,9 @@ object CleanupAliases extends Rule[L
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197788236
**[Test build #53415 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53415/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`cae7b52`](https://gi
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197860828
**[Test build #53426 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53426/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`004b19d`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-197818879
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#discussion_r56538531
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/analysis/Analyzer.scala
---
@@ -1450,7 +1450,9 @@ object CleanupAliases extends Rule[Lo
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196436520
After thinking about it more, I wonder if `missingInput` was really the
right way to handle this problem.
Another option (that is used in every other operator
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196234027
cc @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featu
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196230191
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196230190
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196229872
**[Test build #53057 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53057/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`af6a0bf`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196190295
**[Test build #53057 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/53057/consoleFull)**
for PR 11673 at commit
[`af6a0bf`](https://gi
Github user cloud-fan commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/11673#issuecomment-196188463
retest this please
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
23 matches
Mail list logo
