Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is ena
Github user andrewor14 commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216713219
LGTM merging into master 2.0
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216395832
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216395836
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216395684
**[Test build #57565 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57565/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`40f280a`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216389301
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216389298
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216389178
**[Test build #57562 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57562/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`5a25075`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216382976
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216382973
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216382775
**[Test build #57558 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57558/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`5f75242`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216382062
**[Test build #57565 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57565/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`40f280a`](https://gi
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216382056
Fixed ð
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this featur
Github user vanzin commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216380720
Just a minor thing, otherwise looks ok to me.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your pro
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61813606
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -717,12 +717,11 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216376049
@vanzin how's it looking now ?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does n
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216375370
**[Test build #57562 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57562/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`5a25075`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61809842
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -726,6 +726,14 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
C
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61808094
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -726,6 +726,14 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable wit
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61806604
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -726,6 +726,14 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable wit
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61804511
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -726,6 +726,14 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
C
Github user techaddict commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61803861
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -726,6 +726,14 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable wit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216362685
**[Test build #57558 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57558/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`5f75242`](https://gi
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61800418
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/internal/SQLConf.scala ---
@@ -726,6 +726,14 @@ private[sql] class SQLConf extends Serializable with
C
Github user vanzin commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#discussion_r61800231
--- Diff: sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/RuntimeConfig.scala
---
@@ -86,6 +86,10 @@ class RuntimeConfig private[sql](sqlConf: SQLConf = new
SQL
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216352860
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216352861
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216352688
**[Test build #57548 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57548/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`7d9506a`](https://g
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216335225
**[Test build #57548 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57548/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`7d9506a`](https://gi
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216334279
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your projec
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216334270
**[Test build #57546 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57546/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`08cea82`](https://g
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216334280
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins//job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216333989
**[Test build #57546 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/57546/consoleFull)**
for PR 12846 at commit
[`08cea82`](https://gi
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846#issuecomment-216333816
cc: @vanzin @marmbrus
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have
GitHub user techaddict opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12846
[SPARK-14422][SQL] Improve handling of optional configs in SQLConf
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Create a new API for handling Optional Configs in SQLConf.
Right now
35 matches
Mail list logo
