Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200#discussion_r160391487
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -1345,13 +1346,12 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
if (buf.isEmpty)
Github user cloud-fan commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200#discussion_r160391233
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
def subtract(
Github user hvanhovell commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200#discussion_r160390893
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/rdd/RDD.scala ---
@@ -985,7 +985,7 @@ abstract class RDD[T: ClassTag](
def subtract(
GitHub user gengliangwang opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20200
[SPARK-23005][Core] Improve RDD.take on small number of partitions
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In current implementation of RDD.take, we overestimate the number of
