Github user davies commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#discussion_r63562738
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/util/package.scala ---
@@ -162,7 +162,18 @@ package object util {
def
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219785529
LGTM,
Merging this into master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#discussion_r63562728
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -1207,15 +1209,18 @@ private[python] class PythonMLLibAPI
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#discussion_r63563251
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -967,4 +968,122 @@ object LogisticRegressionSuite {
Github user tedyu commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#discussion_r63563275
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/CommandBuilderUtils.java ---
@@ -334,6 +334,18 @@ static void addPermGenSizeOpt(List cmd) {
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12939#issuecomment-219786749
@sarutak Could you send another PR for 1.6 branch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user yhuai commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13144#issuecomment-219787089
LGTM. Merging to master and branch 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#discussion_r63563726
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/NaiveBayesSuite.scala
---
@@ -206,4 +210,48 @@ object NaiveBayesSuite {
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13144
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#discussion_r63564073
--- Diff: python/pyspark/ml/feature.py ---
@@ -59,6 +60,36 @@
'Word2Vec', 'Word2VecModel']
+class LabeledPoint(object):
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#discussion_r63565228
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConf.scala ---
@@ -62,7 +62,8 @@ class SparkConf(loadDefaults: Boolean) extends Cloneable
with
Github user BryanCutler commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#discussion_r63565781
--- Diff: core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkConfSuite.scala ---
@@ -281,6 +285,7 @@ class SparkConfSuite extends SparkFunSuite with
Github user mengxr commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#discussion_r63566248
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/mllib/api/python/PythonMLLibAPI.scala ---
@@ -1207,15 +1209,18 @@ private[python] class PythonMLLibAPI
Github user BryanCutler commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13146#issuecomment-219792598
@zjffdu I made some comments, however I sort of feel that the Python
executable is an environment setting and not really a Spark property, so it
would be better to
Github user srowen commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#discussion_r63567123
--- Diff:
launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/launcher/CommandBuilderUtils.java ---
@@ -334,6 +334,18 @@ static void addPermGenSizeOpt(List cmd) {
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13150#issuecomment-219793393
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
GitHub user Parth-Brahmbhatt opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13150
[SPARK-15365] [SQL]: When table size statistics are not available from
metastore, we should fallback to HDFS
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Currently if a table
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#discussion_r63567867
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/ExperimentalMethods.scala ---
@@ -42,7 +43,7 @@ class ExperimentalMethods private[sql]() {
*
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13147#discussion_r63567938
--- Diff:
sql/catalyst/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/catalyst/planning/QueryPlanner.scala
---
@@ -27,6 +27,16 @@ import
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219795494
**[Test build #58704 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58704/consoleFull)**
for PR 8559 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219795817
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219795822
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219796446
**[Test build #58707 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58707/consoleFull)**
for PR 13057 at commit
Github user dbtsai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#discussion_r63569421
--- Diff:
mllib/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/classification/LogisticRegressionSuite.scala
---
@@ -967,4 +968,122 @@ object LogisticRegressionSuite {
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13042#issuecomment-219797583
**[Test build #58701 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58701/consoleFull)**
for PR 13042 at commit
Github user marmbrus commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12855#issuecomment-219797464
Thanks, merging to master and 2.0.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13042#issuecomment-219797991
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user yhuai commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13079#discussion_r63570204
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/command/tables.scala ---
@@ -626,40 +626,149 @@ case class ShowCreateTableCommand(table:
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13042#issuecomment-219797992
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219798061
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219798051
**[Test build #58707 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58707/consoleFull)**
for PR 13057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219798065
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-219799454
**[Test build #58708 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58708/consoleFull)**
for PR 12627 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219801108
**[Test build #58709 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58709/consoleFull)**
for PR 13057 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219801978
**[Test build #58703 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58703/consoleFull)**
for PR 13057 at commit
Github user techaddict commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13101#issuecomment-219801934
ping @andrewor14 @mengxr
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#issuecomment-219802080
**[Test build #58705 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58705/consoleFull)**
for PR 13065 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219802301
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219802293
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#issuecomment-219802388
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13065#issuecomment-219802386
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#issuecomment-219803276
**[Test build #58706 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58706/consoleFull)**
for PR 12952 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#issuecomment-219803514
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12952#issuecomment-219803506
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219805888
**[Test build #58709 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58709/consoleFull)**
for PR 13057 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219806015
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13057#issuecomment-219806016
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
GitHub user davies opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151
[SPARK-15357] Cooperative spilling should check consumer memory mode
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
Since we support forced spilling for Spillable, which only works in
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219807401
cc @andrewor14
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8411
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12855
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13094#issuecomment-219807927
@rxin updated.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219808342
**[Test build #58710 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58710/consoleFull)**
for PR 13151 at commit
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13082#issuecomment-219808144
@andrewor14 Could you review this since @JoshRosen is on vocation.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13094#issuecomment-219808343
**[Test build #58711 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58711/consoleFull)**
for PR 13094 at commit
GitHub user shubhamchopra opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13152
[SPARK-15353] [CORE] Making peer selection for block replication pluggable
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR makes block replication strategies pluggable.
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13152#issuecomment-219809650
Can one of the admins verify this patch?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/8559#issuecomment-219809827
**[Test build #58712 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58712/consoleFull)**
for PR 8559 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13135#issuecomment-219809983
This looks ok - though the Scala example doesn't throw the exception - why
is that (since it is also setting `thresholds`)?
---
If your project is set up for it, you
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153
[SPARK-15317][Core]Don't store accumulators for every task in listeners
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
In general, the Web UI doesn't need to store the
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219810982
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219810987
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219810948
**[Test build #58710 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58710/consoleFull)**
for PR 13151 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219811230
**[Test build #58713 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58713/consoleFull)**
for PR 13153 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13151#issuecomment-219814116
**[Test build #58714 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58714/consoleFull)**
for PR 13151 at commit
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12957#issuecomment-219814882
@hhbyyh ok sounds good. LGTM, merged to master/branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12957
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user MLnick commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13125#issuecomment-219816541
Merged to master/branch-2.0. Thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13125
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/7075#issuecomment-219818786
[Test build #58715 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58715/consoleFull)
for PR 7075 at commit
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13125#issuecomment-219820760
Thank you, @MLnick !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13104#discussion_r63584448
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/text/TextSuite.scala
---
@@ -65,6 +65,14 @@ class TextSuite extends QueryTest
Github user marmbrus commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13104#discussion_r63584539
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/datasources/text/TextSuite.scala
---
@@ -65,6 +65,14 @@ class TextSuite extends QueryTest
GitHub user zsxwing opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154
[WIP]Check SparkContext not stop
## What changes were proposed in this pull request?
(Please fill in changes proposed in this fix)
## How was this patch tested?
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219823142
**[Test build #58716 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58716/consoleFull)**
for PR 13153 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219824421
**[Test build #58717 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58717/consoleFull)**
for PR 13154 at commit
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219827362
**[Test build #58717 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58717/consoleFull)**
for PR 13154 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219827397
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219827393
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13154#issuecomment-219828129
**[Test build #2988 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/NewSparkPullRequestBuilder/2988/consoleFull)**
for PR 13154 at commit
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#discussion_r63588818
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/LinearRegression.scala ---
@@ -252,7 +250,7 @@ class LinearRegression @Since("1.3.0")
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#discussion_r63588786
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/AFTSurvivalRegression.scala
---
@@ -88,8 +88,8 @@ private[regression] trait
Github user jkbradley commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13129#discussion_r63588807
--- Diff:
mllib/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/ml/regression/IsotonicRegression.scala ---
@@ -69,8 +69,8 @@ private[regression] trait
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-219832229
**[Test build #58708 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58708/consoleFull)**
for PR 12627 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-219832497
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-219832495
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13094#issuecomment-219833544
**[Test build #58711 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58711/consoleFull)**
for PR 13094 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13094#issuecomment-219833831
Test PASSed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13094#issuecomment-219833828
Merged build finished. Test PASSed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user mengxr commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/12627#issuecomment-219834198
LGTM. Merged into master and branch-2.0. This should complete the major
MLlib API changes in 2.0. Thanks!
On retrospective, I think we under-estimated the
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13097#issuecomment-219835499
Hi, @davies .
Could you merge this PR?
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219835800
**[Test build #58713 has
finished](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58713/consoleFull)**
for PR 13153 at commit
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219836046
Merged build finished. Test FAILed.
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your
Github user AmplabJenkins commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219836052
Test FAILed.
Refer to this link for build results (access rights to CI server needed):
Github user davies commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13097#issuecomment-219836640
LGTM,
Merging this into master and 2.0, thanks!
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If
Github user asfgit closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13097
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not have this feature
enabled and wishes so, or if the feature is
Github user dongjoon-hyun commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13097#issuecomment-219837638
Thank you, @davies !
---
If your project is set up for it, you can reply to this email and have your
reply appear on GitHub as well. If your project does not
Github user SparkQA commented on the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/13153#issuecomment-219838971
**[Test build #58718 has
started](https://amplab.cs.berkeley.edu/jenkins/job/SparkPullRequestBuilder/58718/consoleFull)**
for PR 13153 at commit
301 - 400 of 586 matches
Mail list logo
