Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21165
Ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21165#discussion_r184404291
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -287,6 +287,33 @@ private[spark] class Executor(
notifyAll
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r184575258
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/cluster/CoarseGrainedSchedulerBackend.scala
---
@@ -170,8 +170,7 @@ class
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21041
@dongjoon-hyun thanks for reporting this. I think this is the same as
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SPARK-23894 . I am nearly certain its
not directly caused by this change, but some
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
[SPARK-23894][CORE][SQL] Defensively clear ActiveSession in Executors
Because SparkSession.getActiveSession uses an InheritableThreadLocal,
the ThreadPool in executors might end up inheriting
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21041
I submitted a PR for SPARK-23894,
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185, please take a look.
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
@cloud-fan
> I think SparkSession is driver only, how do we access it in executor?
that's the whole problem. Its only meant to be available on the driver,
but it ends up gettin
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185#discussion_r184993529
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -299,6 +316,9 @@ private[spark] class Executor
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20604#discussion_r185005638
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/SparkContext.scala ---
@@ -1643,7 +1646,10 @@ class SparkContext(config: SparkConf) extends
Logging
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
Jenkins, retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
I don't understand the comments about "leaked threads". the executor
thread pool is allowed to create threads whenever it wants. You can play
around with this example if y
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
> Yea I think this is the root cause. I'm making a PR to ban SQLConf.get at
executor side, shall we do the same thing for SparkSession? And fixes all the
places that mistakenly access Spar
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21212
This makes sense to me. You should update the comment on
`MapOutputTracker.getMapSizesByExecutorId` to mention that it excludes the
zero-sized blocks, and also remove the filter in
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185532512
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,145
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185543919
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,145
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185545685
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185533750
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala
---
@@ -102,18 +102,14 @@ private[yarn] class
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185534467
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorSuite.scala
---
@@ -354,7 +358,7 @@ class YarnAllocatorSuite
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185528716
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/BlacklistTracker.scala ---
@@ -273,7 +273,7 @@ private[scheduler] class BlacklistTracker
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185556534
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185529548
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/FailureTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185556226
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185539768
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocator.scala
---
@@ -602,8 +569,7 @@ private[yarn] class YarnAllocator
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185549149
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185558661
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185543512
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,145
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r18979
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/YarnAllocatorBlacklistTrackerSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,144
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068#discussion_r185570861
--- Diff:
resource-managers/yarn/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/deploy/yarn/config.scala
---
@@ -328,4 +328,19 @@ package object config
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
@jkbradley still seeing flakiness in R tests, in other PRs too. I'm not
even sure how to interpret the failure. is it safe to ignore those? I can't
see how this would be effecti
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20940
@edwinalu the diff is really weird in github now -- can you merge in the
latest master? Or if github is just confused, maybe close this and open a new
PR. thanks
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Jenkins, ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20940
thanks, can you close this pull request now?
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21212
If you have a heap dump, there are tools that can check for wasted space in
ArrayBuffer. Eg. [jxray](http://www.jxray.com/) or [YourKit Memory
Inspections](https://www.yourkit.com/docs/java/help
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21212
can you add a test in MapOutputTrackerSuite and update the pr description
to include all the changes? but overall looks good
Github user squito closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21131
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21131
merged to master / 2.3 / 2.2
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
I'm closing this in favor of https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21190
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-uns
Github user squito closed the pull request at:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h...@spark.apache.org
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21185#discussion_r186772234
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -229,6 +229,23 @@ private[spark] class Executor
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21212
@jinxing64
> I guess your concern is ArrayBuffer will do lots of copy as size of
elements grows, and we don't need fast random access in
ShuffleBlockFetcherIterator
my concer
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21280
Jenkins, add to whitelist
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221
Jenkins, retest this please
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21341
sure this is fine, but we'll see the flakiness back in the builds till
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21299 is merged,
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21299#discussion_r188650358
--- Diff:
sql/core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/sql/execution/SQLExecution.scala ---
@@ -90,13 +92,42 @@ object SQLExecution {
* thread from the
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346
[SPARK-6237][NETWORK] Network-layer changes to allow stream upload.
These changes allow an RPCHandler to receive an upload as a stream of
data, without having to buffer the entire message in the
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346
All good questions and stuff I had wondered about too -- I should actually
be sure to comment on these on the jira as well:
> I recall that the problem with large shuffle blocks was that
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346
btw I may have made the pull-based approach sound more complex than I meant
to, I'm happy to take that approach if you think its better. The fact the
replication is synchronous doesn
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356
[SPARK-24309][CORE] AsyncEventQueue should stop on interrupt.
EventListeners can interrupt the event queue thread. In particular,
when the EventLoggingListener writes to hdfs, hdfs can
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356#discussion_r189152423
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/AsyncEventQueue.scala ---
@@ -97,6 +98,11 @@ private class AsyncEventQueue(val name: String, conf
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356
> does this mean a problematic listener can kill the queue and crash other
listeners in the same queue? Shall we do some isolation?
yeah I think marcelo was asking about this above
ht
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356
I pushed an update which only removes the listener which was active at the
interrupt. Note that is not the same thing as the listener which *caused* the
interrupt, necessarily -- we have no idea
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356
> As an alternative design option, PoisonPill could be handled differently,
since some msgs should have higher priority and can be considered them as part
of your "control plane".
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356#discussion_r189384006
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -80,6 +89,11 @@ private[spark] trait ListenerBus[L <: AnyRef, E] exte
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356
the problem was not actually an interrupted exception from the listener, it
was that the Thread's state was getting set to interrupted, and then there
would be a failure later in `queue
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356#discussion_r189483397
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -80,6 +89,11 @@ private[spark] trait ListenerBus[L <: AnyRef, E] exte
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356#discussion_r189604443
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/ListenerBus.scala ---
@@ -80,7 +89,16 @@ private[spark] trait ListenerBus[L <: AnyRef, E] exte
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
ping @tgravescs . honestly I still don't love the blacklist limit,
especially since it makes reporting back to the driver pretty confusing, and I
don't think it buys us much. But I can
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/20640
thats fine with me, but as I'm neither a user of mesos nor am I in touch w/
many mesos users, I'd like wait a bit for more opinions, given the
ramifications of this change. (that shoul
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21356#discussion_r189702478
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/AsyncEventQueue.scala ---
@@ -130,7 +129,11 @@ private class AsyncEventQueue(val name: String, conf
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
I totally understand your motivation for wanting the limit. But I'm trying
to balance that against behavior which might not really achieve the desired
effect and be even more confusing in
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
I mean when `YarnAllocatorBlacklistTracker` decides to blacklist because of
allocation failures, it doesn't send any message back to the driver -- so the
driver doesn't have a msg in the
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190346995
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -93,6 +96,10 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190353891
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/DAGScheduler.scala
---
@@ -209,6 +210,16 @@ class DAGScheduler(
private[scheduler] val
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190346570
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -81,7 +84,7 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190363619
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +261,233 @@ class EventLoggingListenerSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190351033
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListener.scala ---
@@ -169,6 +183,35 @@ private[spark] class EventLoggingListener
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190345745
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/executor/Executor.scala ---
@@ -800,26 +812,50 @@ private[spark] class Executor
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190359417
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +261,233 @@ class EventLoggingListenerSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190363971
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +261,233 @@ class EventLoggingListenerSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190364971
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/EventLoggingListenerSuite.scala
---
@@ -251,6 +261,233 @@ class EventLoggingListenerSuite extends
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r190405223
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PeakExecutorMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346
Last failures are known flakies.
A few updates here from my last set of comments. I've posted an overall
design doc, and shared the tests I'm running on a cluster. I think the te
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r191059478
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/test/java/org/apache/spark/network/StreamTestHelper.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,101 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440
[SPARK-24307][CORE] Support reading remote cached partitions > 2gb
(1) Netty's ByteBuf cannot support data > 2gb. So to transfer data from a
ChunkedByteBuffer over the network, we u
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440#discussion_r191471289
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/util/io/ChunkedByteBufferFileRegion.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,105 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440#discussion_r191472540
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/io/ChunkedByteBufferFileRegionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440#discussion_r191472949
--- Diff:
core/src/test/scala/org/apache/spark/io/ChunkedByteBufferFileRegionSuite.scala
---
@@ -0,0 +1,154 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440#discussion_r191476566
--- Diff: core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/storage/BlockManager.scala
---
@@ -659,6 +659,11 @@ private[spark] class BlockManager(
* Get block
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440
thanks for the reviews @markhamstra @Ngone51 , I've updated the pr
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-uns
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21221#discussion_r191489062
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/scheduler/PeakExecutorMetrics.scala ---
@@ -0,0 +1,127 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache Software
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
[SPARK-24296][CORE][WIP] Replicate large blocks as a stream.
When replicating large cached RDD blocks, it can be helpful to replicate
them as a stream, to avoid using large amounts of memory
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
This is the change for SPARK-24296, on top of
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346 and
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21440
Posting here for testing. Review are welcome on this
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21456
Ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346
yeah I see what you're saying about better error handling, but I'd really
rather not take that on here. I think some prior attempts at solving the 2gb
limit have tried to take on too muc
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r191976952
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/StreamData.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the Apache
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r191978140
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/StreamInterceptor.java
---
@@ -50,16 +52,22 @@
@Override
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r191978545
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/client/TransportClient.java
---
@@ -141,26 +141,14 @@ public void fetchChunk
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r191979019
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/protocol/UploadStream.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r191979425
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/protocol/UploadStream.java
---
@@ -0,0 +1,107 @@
+/*
+ * Licensed to the
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346#discussion_r191981552
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/RpcHandler.java
---
@@ -38,15 +38,24 @@
*
* This method will
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21346
> is this effectively dead code at this point?
yes, thats right. this PR by itself is not useful. Its a step towards
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451
This is a g
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21456
From my understanding, that option is only available with G1GC, which is
not really a good fit for spark (forget the exact details but something about
humongous allocations which are common with all
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21451#discussion_r192136490
--- Diff:
common/network-common/src/main/java/org/apache/spark/network/server/RpcHandler.java
---
@@ -38,15 +38,24 @@
*
* This method will
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21456
Re: normalization -- if I understand correctly, its not that you know that
the normalization definitely *does* change the strings for the heap dump you
have. Its just to make sure that your change
GitHub user squito opened a pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474
[SPARK-24297][CORE] Fetch-to-disk by default for > 2gb
Fetch-to-mem is guaranteed to fail if the message is bigger than 2 GB,
so we might as well use fetch-to-disk in that case. The mess
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21068
hey sorry I have been meaning to respond to this but keep getting
sidetracked. As Tom and I are going to meet in person next week anyway, I
figure at this point it makes sense to just wait till we
Github user squito commented on a diff in the pull request:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21474#discussion_r192487033
--- Diff:
core/src/main/scala/org/apache/spark/internal/config/package.scala ---
@@ -429,7 +429,11 @@ package object config {
"external sh
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21376
I'm still seeing a lot of build failures which seem to be related to this
(accessing a conf in a task in turn accesses the LiveListenerBus). Is this
something new? Or related to this change
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21482
Jenkins, ok to test
---
-
To unsubscribe, e-mail: reviews-unsubscr...@spark.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: reviews-h
Github user squito commented on the issue:
https://github.com/apache/spark/pull/21475
what about "... when they are blacklisted for the entire application, as
controlled by spark.blacklist.applic
601 - 700 of 3535 matches
Mail list logo
